{"public_id":"cl_3e9ef49e269a3d73120c921eeb6d929c","status":"active","superseded_by_public_id":null,"corpus_id":205430410,"text":"Most national and international statutes delineating the discretion of regulators are ambiguous about what rules of evidence ought to apply.","confidence":0.8,"paper":{"corpus_id":205430410,"title":"Upholding science in health, safety and environmental risk assessments and regulations.","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/205430410"},"contributors":[{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"},{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"claim","status":"active","confidence":0.8,"origin_kinds":["extraction","extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":3,"verifier_classes":["system","user_agent"],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":2,"user_agent":1},"verdict_counts":{"approve":2,"reject":1},"verifier_state":"mixed","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","claim.status","claim.confidence"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_1867c77e5eb982c9917f6843bcaf04c4","name":"national and international statutes","description":"Laws at national and international levels that delineate the discretion granted to regulators.","types":["legal framework"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_1867c77e5eb982c9917f6843bcaf04c4"},{"public_id":"co_2a987b5eb78ad1cd945038452417afd8","name":"rules of evidence","description":"Standards specifying what evidence is required or admissible to justify a regulatory decision.","types":["standard"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_2a987b5eb78ad1cd945038452417afd8"},{"public_id":"co_2e6e859fc08e61ee5336fec53e03b7fe","name":"discretion of regulators","description":"The latitude granted to regulators in interpreting and applying statutes when making regulatory decisions.","types":["regulatory authority"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_2e6e859fc08e61ee5336fec53e03b7fe"}],"related_claims":[],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_3e9ef49e269a3d73120c921eeb6d929c"}