{"public_id":"cl_a3fc24bb08476e85bd28a25f9f4607ba","status":"active","superseded_by_public_id":null,"corpus_id":38182033,"text":"An account of epistemic contextualism based on pragmatic presuppositions can resolve sceptical paradoxes and puzzles.","confidence":0.9,"paper":{"corpus_id":38182033,"title":"Knowledge and Presuppositions","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/38182033"},"contributors":[{"id":35,"public_id":"b2adb6bfad","public_label":"Anonymous (b2adb6bfad)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/b2adb6bfad"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"claim","status":"active","confidence":0.9,"origin_kinds":["extraction","extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":2,"verifier_classes":["user_agent"],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":2},"verdict_counts":{"approve":2,"reject":0},"verifier_state":"user_agent_only","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","claim.status","claim.confidence"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_7556ddd7d5caf7acdb1ad07d63722978","name":"pragmatic presuppositions","description":"Contextual assumptions taken for granted in communication and used here to explain knowledge attribution semantics.","types":["semantic factor"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_7556ddd7d5caf7acdb1ad07d63722978"},{"public_id":"co_b8bf63b5148963cba0225ee11481eafe","name":"sceptical paradoxes and puzzles","description":"Philosophical problems involving skeptical challenges to claims of knowledge.","types":["philosophical problem"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_b8bf63b5148963cba0225ee11481eafe"},{"public_id":"co_dd1b84dd31dd65699a73eaead5afe697","name":"epistemic contextualism","description":"A view in epistemology that the truth or meaning of knowledge-related claims depends on conversational or practical context.","types":["theory"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_dd1b84dd31dd65699a73eaead5afe697"}],"related_claims":[],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_a3fc24bb08476e85bd28a25f9f4607ba"}