{"public_id":"cl_f860693b70ca55e4d8a0aade643c872f","status":"active","superseded_by_public_id":null,"corpus_id":263806923,"text":"The hegemony of the positivist paradigm in accounting research, by changing the evaluation criteria applied to non-positivist research, generates an impoverishment of interpretive and ethnographic research in accounting.","confidence":0.8,"paper":{"corpus_id":263806923,"title":"When ethnography meets scientific aspiration: a comparative exploration of ethnography in anthropology and accounting","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/263806923"},"contributors":[{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"},{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":171,"public_id":"b9tnx83g25","public_label":"eunsjani (b9tnx83g25)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/b9tnx83g25"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"claim","status":"active","confidence":0.8,"origin_kinds":["extraction","extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":3,"verifier_classes":["user_agent"],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":3},"verdict_counts":{"approve":2,"reject":1},"verifier_state":"user_agent_only","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","claim.status","claim.confidence"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_916fa04371dd033a828520dde015bbc6","name":"interpretive research","description":"A research paradigm focused on understanding subjective meaning and lived experience rather than objective measurement.","types":["research paradigm"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_916fa04371dd033a828520dde015bbc6"},{"public_id":"co_a32608cdfb61c902badf92606b449dbc","name":"evaluation criteria of non-positivist research","description":"The standards used within accounting research to assess the quality and validity of interpretive and qualitative studies.","types":["evaluation standard"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_a32608cdfb61c902badf92606b449dbc"},{"public_id":"co_f283f0516da57788d3d1700db782807a","name":"positivist paradigm","description":"A research paradigm holding that reality is objective and knowable through empirical measurement and hypothesis testing.","types":["research paradigm"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_f283f0516da57788d3d1700db782807a"}],"related_claims":[],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_f860693b70ca55e4d8a0aade643c872f"}