{"public_id":"co_0678a11bbdd35ae847e5be3b702c4136","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_0678a11bbdd35ae847e5be3b702c4136","name":"intent-to-treat analysis","description":"An analysis that evaluates participants according to their originally assigned treatment groups regardless of treatment received.","aliases":["ITT analysis","ITT"],"types":["analysis method"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":0,"verifier_classes":[],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":0},"verdict_counts":{"approve":0,"reject":0},"verifier_state":"no_verdicts","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":229421730,"title":"The Reality of Randomized Controlled Trials for Assessing the Benefit of Proton Therapy: Critically Examining the Intent-to-Treat Principle in the Presence of Insurance Denial","citation_count":8,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/229421730"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_22e876fa38a35ff5fef2b6a13336b8bc","text":"Increasing rates of insurance denial produce bias and loss of statistical power across intent-to-treat, per-protocol, and as-treated analyses in the simulated proton therapy trial.","corpus_id":229421730,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_22e876fa38a35ff5fef2b6a13336b8bc"},{"public_id":"cl_38558e7850197213921d48b7defbb11c","text":"Insurance denial induces misclassification bias in intent-to-treat analysis, missing data problems in per-protocol analysis, and covariate imbalance in as-treated analysis.","corpus_id":229421730,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_38558e7850197213921d48b7defbb11c"},{"public_id":"cl_ede4dc9a82657351241c675ce2454972","text":"When clinical success depends on age, per-protocol and intent-to-treat analyses show similar bias and power trends and both outperform as-treated analysis.","corpus_id":229421730,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_ede4dc9a82657351241c675ce2454972"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0678a11bbdd35ae847e5be3b702c4136","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0678a11bbdd35ae847e5be3b702c4136"}