{"public_id":"co_0eeca6484874ae2d1cb243535a448338","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_0eeca6484874ae2d1cb243535a448338","name":"theory","description":"Conceptual frameworks used to interpret and organize historical evidence.","aliases":[],"types":["theoretical framework"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":0,"verifier_classes":[],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":0},"verdict_counts":{"approve":0,"reject":0},"verifier_state":"no_verdicts","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":143248330,"title":"Critical and interpretive histories: insights into accounting’s present and future through its past","citation_count":519,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/143248330"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_de8de7cfeabdec6392b0060d2af041bc","text":"A tension exists between historians who prioritize archival evidence and those who rely primarily on theory in historical investigation.","corpus_id":143248330,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_de8de7cfeabdec6392b0060d2af041bc"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0eeca6484874ae2d1cb243535a448338","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0eeca6484874ae2d1cb243535a448338"}