{"public_id":"co_6dac9284cae8a03cbb2958b05ddaf18e","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_6dac9284cae8a03cbb2958b05ddaf18e","name":"foreign legal materials","description":"Legal sources from other jurisdictions, including judicial opinions cited by courts.","aliases":["foreign materials"],"types":["legal source"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":0,"verifier_classes":[],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":0},"verdict_counts":{"approve":0,"reject":0},"verifier_state":"no_verdicts","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":150693768,"title":"Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights","citation_count":14,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/150693768"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_78cdf0e66822e1c904ec8c84d62e6bc0","text":"Judicial citation of foreign legal materials has intensified recent debate over the relationship between human rights interpretation and comparative legal methods.","corpus_id":150693768,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_78cdf0e66822e1c904ec8c84d62e6bc0"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6dac9284cae8a03cbb2958b05ddaf18e","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6dac9284cae8a03cbb2958b05ddaf18e"}