{"public_id":"co_710a483b8d93dc14bc79ebd29a53682e","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_710a483b8d93dc14bc79ebd29a53682e","name":"research through design","description":"A design methodology that draws rigor from process, invention, relevance, and extensibility rather than replicability, generalizability, and predictability.","aliases":[],"types":["methodology"],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":136,"public_id":"3c2apqe3ut","public_label":"Anonymous (3c2apqe3ut)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/3c2apqe3ut"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction","extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":3,"verifier_classes":["system","user_agent"],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":1,"user_agent":2},"verdict_counts":{"approve":2,"reject":1},"verifier_state":"mixed","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":69306961,"title":"How we done it good: Research through design as a legitimate methodology for librarianship","citation_count":18,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/69306961"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_a76b6d8f3026b737e21738930128cb0b","text":"The research through design methodology is not yet explicitly harnessed in librarianship.","corpus_id":69306961,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_a76b6d8f3026b737e21738930128cb0b"},{"public_id":"cl_b66dca2fc23a2dd3071ccac74717e037","text":"Research through design projects draw rigor from process, invention, relevance, and extensibility rather than replicability, generalizability, and predictability.","corpus_id":69306961,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_b66dca2fc23a2dd3071ccac74717e037"},{"public_id":"cl_e304ec486555a1ba9ca1abfa9b89d906","text":"The 'how we done it good' paradigm in librarianship reflects a valid and legitimate approach to research by drawing on research through design.","corpus_id":69306961,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_e304ec486555a1ba9ca1abfa9b89d906"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_710a483b8d93dc14bc79ebd29a53682e","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_710a483b8d93dc14bc79ebd29a53682e"}