{"public_id":"co_848fa40dfd13e0bdbc42ad9b5077feae","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_848fa40dfd13e0bdbc42ad9b5077feae","name":"robustness and accuracy","description":"The reliability and correctness of a classification scheme when used for bibliometric analysis.","aliases":[],"types":["evaluation criteria"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":0,"verifier_classes":[],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":0},"verdict_counts":{"approve":0,"reject":0},"verifier_state":"no_verdicts","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":59287570,"title":"Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science","citation_count":89,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/59287570"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_ebc4eaf77ed3c1d0b7ae596b1d3938af","text":"Journal and paper disciplinary classifications deserve greater attention to robustness and accuracy in bibliometric indicator construction and analysis.","corpus_id":59287570,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_ebc4eaf77ed3c1d0b7ae596b1d3938af"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_848fa40dfd13e0bdbc42ad9b5077feae","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_848fa40dfd13e0bdbc42ad9b5077feae"}