{"public_id":"co_9f3aa7ae10d33d5c26d976cc7b531d10","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_9f3aa7ae10d33d5c26d976cc7b531d10","name":"soil CO2 efflux (Rs)","description":"The total CO2 flux from the soil surface, measured using automated soil chambers in a temperate deciduous oak forest.","aliases":["Rs"],"types":["flux","measurement"],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction","extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":2,"verifier_classes":["system"],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":2,"user_agent":0},"verdict_counts":{"approve":1,"reject":1},"verifier_state":"system_only","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":15727682,"title":"Exploring the \"overflow tap\" theory: linking forest soil CO 2 fluxes and individual mycorrhizosphere components to photosynthesis","citation_count":104,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/15727682"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_03fc83a299705a9727d8bbf1114e1b0f","text":"Annual cumulative soil CO2 efflux (Rs) was very similar between years (740 ± 43 g C m−2 yr−1) with an average flux of 2.0 ± 0.3 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1, but Rs components varied.","corpus_id":15727682,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_03fc83a299705a9727d8bbf1114e1b0f"},{"public_id":"cl_a1b98399726ca9b6c523b16cc6a3f092","text":"Soil temperature largely explained the daily variation of Rs (R² = 0.81), mostly because of strong responses by Rh (R² = 0.65) and less so for Rr (R² = 0.41) and Rm (R² = 0.18).","corpus_id":15727682,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_a1b98399726ca9b6c523b16cc6a3f092"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_9f3aa7ae10d33d5c26d976cc7b531d10","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_9f3aa7ae10d33d5c26d976cc7b531d10"}