{"public_id":"co_c74a65751f6870bd33a7110c714350e8","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_c74a65751f6870bd33a7110c714350e8","name":"modes of history making","description":"Different ways of producing and interpreting historical accounts.","aliases":[],"types":["methodological approach"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":0,"verifier_classes":[],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":0},"verdict_counts":{"approve":0,"reject":0},"verifier_state":"no_verdicts","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":143248330,"title":"Critical and interpretive histories: insights into accounting’s present and future through its past","citation_count":519,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/143248330"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_fa901e391cc2534b240299256d3ca09d","text":"Open debate among different modes of history making is beneficial for the development of accounting history and for accountants' self-understanding of their organizational and social impact.","corpus_id":143248330,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_fa901e391cc2534b240299256d3ca09d"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_c74a65751f6870bd33a7110c714350e8","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_c74a65751f6870bd33a7110c714350e8"}