{"public_id":"co_db54a87350f994e914001a203ce0e7f2","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_db54a87350f994e914001a203ce0e7f2","name":"longitudinal follow-up","description":"Repeated observation of the case over time.","aliases":[],"types":["method"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":0,"verifier_classes":[],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":0},"verdict_counts":{"approve":0,"reject":0},"verifier_state":"no_verdicts","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":142459828,"title":"Interpretative Process – From Utilization of Predominant to Psychotic Decompensation","citation_count":8,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/142459828"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_99ced8c64f138ab29adbf36312d67d00","text":"Psychiatric assessment, longitudinal follow-up, and family dynamic study were used to examine the case.","corpus_id":142459828,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_99ced8c64f138ab29adbf36312d67d00"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_db54a87350f994e914001a203ce0e7f2","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_db54a87350f994e914001a203ce0e7f2"}