{"public_id":"co_e35a0c9ecfcfc1a65e0a734f15186b6f","status":"active","merged_into_public_id":null,"resolved_public_id":"co_e35a0c9ecfcfc1a65e0a734f15186b6f","name":"empirical testing","description":"The use of observed data to test hypotheses or proposed relationships.","aliases":[],"types":["research method"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"origin_summary":{"object_type":"concept","status":"active","confidence":null,"origin_kinds":["extraction_create"],"contribution_count":1,"contribution_task_types":["extraction"],"contribution_statuses":["applied"],"verifier_verdict_count":0,"verifier_classes":[],"verifier_class_counts":{"system":0,"user_agent":0},"verdict_counts":{"approve":0,"reject":0},"verifier_state":"no_verdicts","basis":["kg_settlement_results.decision_payload.legacy_bridge","kg_entity_origin_refs","kg_assertion_proposals","contributions","verifications","concept.status"],"limits":["ledger provenance is aggregated; raw contribution and verifier audit rows are not expanded","entity matching uses settlement bridge refs and edge commands"]},"papers":[{"corpus_id":167939087,"title":"Logistics innovation: a literature‐based conceptual framework","citation_count":228,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/167939087"}],"claims":[{"public_id":"cl_36e7d164af4d8e8c8e8170f8b2b575ea","text":"Antecedents and outcomes of logistics innovation have been identified in the reviewed logistics literature, but very little empirical testing has been done.","corpus_id":167939087,"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_36e7d164af4d8e8c8e8170f8b2b575ea"}],"related_concepts":[],"resolved_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_e35a0c9ecfcfc1a65e0a734f15186b6f","url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_e35a0c9ecfcfc1a65e0a734f15186b6f"}