Scholarly Merit in a Global Context: The Nation Gap in Psychological Science

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Perspectives on Psychological Science

• Publication date

  2017-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/1745691617708233PMID 29149576
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Some Evidence for a Gender Gap in Personality and Social Psychology

  2016influential reference
• “Am I Famous Yet?” Judging Scholarly Merit in Psychological Science

  2016cited by this paper
• Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige.

  2016cited by this paper
• Guidelines for Tinnitus-Reply.

  2016cited by this paper
• Scientific Eminence

  2016cited by this paper
• The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis

  2015cited by this paper
• Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers

  2015cited by this paper
• An incomplete list of eminent psychologists of the modern era.

  2014cited by this paper
• World trends in psychological research output and impact.

  2012cited by this paper
• Internationalization of psychological research: Publications and collaborations of the United States and other leading countries.

  2012cited by this paper
• Weird people, yes, but also weird experiments

  2010cited by this paper
• WEIRD languages have misled us, too

  2010cited by this paper
• American psychology is becoming more international.

  2009cited by this paper
• The neglected 95%: why American psychology needs to become less American.

  2008influential reference
• Everything old is new again.

  2007cited by this paper
• The (scientific) wealth of nations

  2004cited by this paper
• National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals.

  1990cited by this paper
• The Matthew Effect in Science

  1988cited by this paper

• Diversity in research on the psychology of language: A large-scale examination of sampling bias.

  2025cites this paper
• Why Research From Lower- and Middle-Income Countries Matters to Evidence-Based Intervention: A State of the Science Review of ACT Research as an Example.

  2024cites this paper
• Empathy moderates the relationship between cognitive load and prosocial behaviour

  2023cites this paper
• Linguistic and geographic diversity in research on second language acquisition and multilingualism: An analysis of selected journals

  2023cites this paper
• Responding to the Association for Psychological Science Strategic Plan, 2022–2027

  2022cites this paper
• Thinking Styles in Arab Research: An Analysis of the Studies in the Arab Educational Information Network (Shamaa)

  2022cites this paper
• The Next Chapter at PSPR

  2022cites this paper
• On the Association between Grants and Scholarly Achievement among the World’s Most Eminent Psychologists

  2022cites this paper
• Choice Deprivation, Choice Overload, and Satisfaction with Choices Across Six Nations

  2021cites this paper
• A qualitative study of perception of a dishonesty experiment

  2021cites this paper
• How diverse are the samples used to study intimate relationships? A systematic review

  2021cites this paper
• Mentioning the Sample’s Country in the Article’s Title Leads to Bias in Research Evaluation

  2021cites this paper
• Free Trade or Trade Wars: Controversies, Political Interests, and Narratives

  2021cites this paper
• Balancing the Freedom–Security Trade-Off During Crises and Disasters

  2021cites this paper
• Selection Effects on Dishonest Behavior

  2020cites this paper
• How USA-Centric Is Psychology? An Archival Study of Implicit Assumptions of Generalizability of Findings to Human Nature Based on Origins of Study Samples

  2020cites this paper
• Personality science: United in diversity. Inaugural editorial for the new journal "Personality Science"

  2020cites this paper
• Expanding the Reach of Psychological Science

  2019cites this paper
• What might get published in management and applied psychology? Experimentally manipulating implicit expectations of reviewers regarding hedges

  2019cites this paper
• Evaluating Merit Among Scientists

  2018cites this paper
• Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population

  2018cites this paper
• Afterword: In the Matter of Judging Scientific Merit

  2017cites this paper