Adapting to a Changing Landscape: How Wisconsin Loggers Persist in an Era of Parcelization

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Forest Products Journal

• Publication date

  2014-08-08

• Fields of study

  Engineering, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00042
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Cost Analysis of Forest Biomass Supply Chain Logistics

  2013cited by this paper
• Innovation Impacts on Biomass Supply in Maine's Logging Industry

  2011cited by this paper
• Midwest Logging Firm Perspectives: Harvesting on Increasingly Parcelized Forestlands

  2011cited by this paper
• Wood-to-energy expansion, forest ownership changes, and mill closure: Consequences for U.S. South's wood supply chain

  2010cited by this paper
• Characteristics of Virginia's Logging Businesses in a Changing Timber Market

  2010cited by this paper
• Parcelization of South Carolina's private forestland: loggers' reactions to a growing threat.

  2009cited by this paper
• Changes in Georgia's Logging Workforce, 1987–2007

  2008cited by this paper
• Productivity and cost of cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting in a mixed-conifer stand

  2007cited by this paper
• Logging firms, nonindustrial private forests, and forest parcelization: evidence of firm specialization and its impact on sustainable timber supply

  2006cited by this paper
• Comparing mechanized and non-mechanized logging firms in Wisconsin : Implications for a dynamic ownership and policy environment

  2005cited by this paper
• Stakeholders' Perceptions of Parcelization in Wisconsin's Northwoods

  2003cited by this paper
• The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia

  1999cited by this paper
• Harvesting Cost Implications of Changes in the Size of Timber Sales in Georgia

  1997cited by this paper
• Decreasing Woodlot Size and the Future of Timber Sales in Massachusetts: When Is an Operation Too Small?

  1996cited by this paper
• Relating Forestry Investment to the Characteristics of Nonindustrial Private Forestland Owners in Northern California

  1987cited by this paper
• Size of Forest Holding and Investment Behavior of Nonindustrial Private Owners

  1984cited by this paper

• Characterizing draft animal logging operations in the southeastern United States

  2025cites this paper
• Logging Business Challenges in the US South and Lake States

  2024cites this paper
• Harvesting fragmented boreal forest: system selection using a simulation-optimization approach

  2024cites this paper
• A Multi-Criterion Evaluation Process for Determining Cost-Effective Harvesting Systems in Fragmented Boreal Forests

  2024cites this paper
• Assessing the wood-basket and characterizing Michigan's logging businesses by their reliance on nonindustrial private forests for stumpage

  2023cites this paper
• Optimization of forest harvest scheduling at the operational level, considering precedence relationship among harvesting activities

  2022cites this paper
• Local policy and landowner attitudes: A case study of forest fragmentation

  2019cites this paper
• The Evolution of Logging Businesses in Georgia 1987–2017 and South Carolina 2012–2017

  2018cites this paper
• A Review of Changes in US Logging Businesses 1980s–Present

  2018cites this paper
• Optimal harvest cluster size with increasing opening costs for harvest sites

  2017cites this paper
• Barriers to logging production and efficiency in Wisconsin

  2017cites this paper
• Foresters' Perceptions of the Frequency, Cost, and Rationale for Seasonal Timber Harvesting Restrictions in Wisconsin

  2017cites this paper
• Is it efficient to single-handedly run a multi-machine harvesting operation? A case study from the Northeast United States

  2016cites this paper
• Case Study of Three High-Performing Contract Loggers with Distinct Harvest Systems: Are They Thriving, Striving, or Just Surviving?

  2016cites this paper