The US Clean Water Act and Habitat Replacement: Evaluation of Mitigation Sites in Orange County, California, USA

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2002

• Venue

  Environmental Management

• Publication date

  2002-11-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/S00267-002-2787-3PMID 12375092
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States

  2017cited by this paper
• Impacts of section 404 permits requiring compensatory mitigation on wetlands in California (USA)

  2004cited by this paper
• Validity of Performance Criteria and a Tentative Model for Regulatory Use in Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Permitting

  1999cited by this paper
• Nationwide permit program: Unknown adverse impacts on the commonwealth of the northern Mariana Islands’ Wetlands

  1998cited by this paper
• The Role of Biological Indicators in a State Water Quality Management Process

  1998cited by this paper
• Fixing Compensatory Mitigation: What Will it Take?

  1996cited by this paper
• Improving the Success of Wetland Creation and Restoration with Know‐How, Time, and Self‐Design

  1996cited by this paper
• Coastal Mitigation in Southern California: The Need for a Regional Restoration Strategy

  1996cited by this paper
• Wetland loss and substitution by the Section 404 permit program in southern California, USA

  1996cited by this paper
• Rapid wetland functional assessment: Its role and utility in the regulatory arena

  1994cited by this paper
• Trends and patterns in section 404 permitting requiring compensatory mitigation in Oregon and Washington, USA

  1992cited by this paper
• The ecology of riparian habitats of the southern California coastal region: A community profile

  1989cited by this paper
• Measuring the success of wetlands mitigation

  1986cited by this paper
• Critique of present wetlands mitigation policies in the united states based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay

  1985cited by this paper

• Has a dedicated biodiversity offsets policy improved the environmental and social compensation outcomes of development in Australia?

  2024cites this paper
• On-site and in-kind: Compensatory mitigation of California Coastal Zone habitat impacts between 2010 and 2018.

  2024cites this paper
• Destruction and reconstruction: is freshwater offsetting achieving No Net Loss?

  2022cites this paper
• Voluntary Restoration: Mitigation’s Silent Partner in the Quest to Reverse Coastal Wetland Loss in the USA

  2019cites this paper
• A review of biodiversity offsets implemented in the Australian Capital Territory under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

  2019cites this paper
• The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under “no net loss” policies: A global review

  2019cites this paper
• Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting

  2018cites this paper
• Defining Success Criteria for Spartina alterniflora Restoration Projects in Southwestern Louisiana

  2018cites this paper
• Longitudinal evaluation of vegetation richness and cover at wetland compensation sites: implications for regulatory monitoring under the Clean Water Act

  2018cites this paper
• The anatomy of a failed offset

  2017cites this paper
• Are offsets effective? An evaluation of recent environmental offsets in Western Australia

  2017influential citation
• An Assessment of Long-Term Compliance with Performance Standards in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands

  2017cites this paper
• The anatomy of a failed offset 4 5

  2017cites this paper
• Public policy for biodiversity conservation: evaluating outcomes, opportunities and risks

  2017cites this paper
• Inadequate Monitoring and Inappropriate Project Goals: A Case Study on the Determination of Success for the Forester Creek Improvement Project

  2016cites this paper
• Inefficacy of wetland legislation for conserving Quebec wetlands as revealed by mapping of recent disturbances

  2016cites this paper
• Assessment of Practices and Tool Development to Improve Compensatory Mitigation in Southern California

  2015cites this paper
• Compensatory Mitigation Performance: The State of the Science

  2015cites this paper
• La tourbière relocalisée de l’île Notre-Dame : un exemple de mesure de compensation en avance sur son époque

  2015cites this paper
• Post-evaluation of a water pollution control plan: methodology and case study

  2015cites this paper
• Analysis of coastal wetland geography and policy in Humboldt Bay: adapting wetland policies for a changing climate

  2015influential citation
• Best Practices for Southern California Coastal Wetland Restoration and Management in the Face of Climate Change

  2014cites this paper
• Market-Based Strategies to Offset New Development Impacts on Aquatic Ecosystems

  2014cites this paper
• Towards a National Evaluation of Compensatory Mitigation Sites: A Proposed Study Methodology

  2013cites this paper
• The Integration of Ecological Restoration and ScienceEducation: Opportunities for Progress in Both Practices

  2013cites this paper
• Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation in North Carolina: An Evaluation of Regulatory Success

  2013cites this paper
• Primary succession in man-made wetlands: biodiversity, structure and dynamics of macrofaunal assemblages

  2012cites this paper
• Biodiversity offsets: Lessons from the American experience

  2011cites this paper
• ‘Mitigation banks’ for wetland conservation: a major success or an unmitigated disaster?

  2010cites this paper
• An investigation of a process for environmental banking appropriate to Queensland

  2010cites this paper
• Historical Ecology as a Tool for Assessing Landscape Change and Informing Wetland Restoration Priorities

  2010cites this paper
• From: on behalf of Panel Registry Subject: FW: supplemental submission Attachments: MW Apr 16 Fish Submission.pdf; ATT475169.htm; HADD compensation article.pdf; ATT475170.htm; Field Audit of Compensation Projects.pdf; ATT475171.htm; 20090504 Walker et al re Why Bartering Biodiversity Fails.pdf; ATT4

  2010influential citation
• Evaluating Aggregate Terrestrial Impacts of Road Construction Projects for Advanced Regional Mitigation

  2009cites this paper
• Habitat banking—how it could work in the UK

  2009cites this paper
• Evaluating Restoration Success of Frequently Implemented Compensation Measures: Results and Demands for Control Procedures

  2008cites this paper
• Wetland mitigation banks and the no-net-loss requirement: an evaluation of the Section 404 permit program in southeast Louisiana

  2008cites this paper
• Remote sensing of tidal freshwater marsh elevation, channels, and vegetation structure

  2008cites this paper
• Performance Criteria, Compliance Success, and Vegetation Development in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands

  2008cites this paper
• It’s All in the Numbers: Acreage Tallies and Environmental Program Evaluation

  2007cites this paper
• A spatial analysis of cumulative habitat loss in Southern California under the Clean Water Act Section 404 Program

  2007cites this paper
• Impacts of plant invaders and management techniques on native communities : ecological and social perspectives at regional and global levels

  2006cites this paper
• Effectiveness of Fish Habitat Compensation in Canada in Achieving No Net Loss

  2006influential citation
• No Net Loss of Fish Habitat: A Review and Analysis of Habitat Compensation in Canada

  2005cites this paper
• Ecological compensation of highway impacts; negotiated trade-off or no-net-loss?

  2005cites this paper
• Wetland ecological and compliance assessments in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, USA.

  2005cites this paper
• success of Wetland Mitigation Projects

  year unknowncites this paper