Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Geophysical Research Letters

• Publication date

  2018-01-28

• Fields of study

  Physics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/2017GL076472
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Radiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areas

  2017cited by this paper
• Shortwave radiative forcing, rapid adjustment, and feedback to the surface by sulfate geoengineering: analysis of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario

  2017influential reference
• First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives

  2017influential reference
• The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations

  2017cited by this paper
• Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015

  2017cited by this paper
• An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering

  2016cited by this paper
• Improved aerosol radiative properties as a foundation for solar geoengineering risk assessment

  2016cited by this paper
• Early growth dynamical implications for the steerability of stratospheric solar radiation management via sulfur aerosol particles

  2016cited by this paper
• Forty years of improvements in European air quality: regional policy-industry interactions with global impacts

  2016cited by this paper
• Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering

  2015cited by this paper
• A temporary, moderate and responsive scenario for solar geoengineering

  2015cited by this paper
• Geoengineering as a design problem

  2015influential reference
• What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO 2

  2015cited by this paper
• Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool the Earth - Report from the National Research Council

  2014cited by this paper
• Can regional climate engineering save the summer Arctic sea ice?

  2014cited by this paper
• Dynamics of the coupled human–climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineering

  2014cited by this paper
• Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

  2014cited by this paper
• Management of trade-offs in geoengineering through optimal choice of non-uniform radiative forcing

  2013cited by this paper
• Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall

  2013cited by this paper
• Climate response to imposed solar radiation reductions in high latitudes

  2012cited by this paper
• Microphysical simulations of sulfur burdens from stratospheric sulfur geoengineering

  2012cited by this paper
• Could aerosol emissions be used for regional heat wave mitigation

  2012cited by this paper
• The dependency of geoengineered sulfate aerosol on the emission strategy

  2011cited by this paper
• Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft

  2010cited by this paper
• Geoengineering as an optimization problem

  2010cited by this paper
• The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone

  2009cited by this paper
• Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections

  2008cited by this paper
• Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies

  2008cited by this paper
• © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Global 2-D intercomparison of sectional and modal aerosol modules

  2007cited by this paper
• Separating chemistry and transport effects in two-dimensional models

  2004cited by this paper
• Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate climate change from a quadrupling of CO2

  2003cited by this paper
• Geoengineering the Climate: History and Prospect 1

  2000cited by this paper
• Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2‐induced climate change

  2000cited by this paper
• Simulation of stratospheric tracers using an improved empirically based two-dimensional model transport

  1999cited by this paper
• A two‐dimensional model of sulfur species and aerosols

  1997cited by this paper
• A “tropical pipe” model of stratospheric transport

  1996cited by this paper
• Perturbation of the northern hemisphere radiative balance by backscattering from anthropogenic sulfate aerosols

  1991cited by this paper
• Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Sensitivity of Aerosol Distribution and Climate Response to Stratospheric SO 2 Injection Locations

  year unknowncited by this paper

• A Climate Intervention Dynamical Emulator (CIDER) for scenario space exploration

  2026cites this paper
• Climate action in space: A sustainable development framework for sunshades at Sun-Earth Lagrange Point 1

  2025cites this paper
• Smoke-charged vortex doubles hemispheric aerosol in the middle stratosphere and buffers ozone depletion

  2024cites this paper
• Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis

  2024cites this paper
• Change in Wind Renewable Energy Potential Under Stratospheric Aerosol Injections

  2024cites this paper
• Strategic logic of unilateral climate intervention

  2023cites this paper
• Optimizing Injection Locations Relaxes Altitude‐Lifetime Trade‐Off for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

  2023cites this paper
• Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review

  2023cites this paper
• Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future

  2023cites this paper
• Particle number concentrations and size distributions in the stratosphere: implications of nucleation mechanisms and particle microphysics

  2023cites this paper
• The value of information about solar geoengineering and the two-sided cost of bias

  2023cites this paper
• Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Can Reduce Risks to Antarctic Ice Loss Depending on Injection Location and Amount

  2023cites this paper
• Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity

  2023influential citation
• An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide

  2022cites this paper
• The Future Is the Termination Shock: On the Antinomies and Psychopathologies of Geoengineering. Part One

  2022cites this paper
• 18 Politically relevant solar geoengineering scenarios

  2022cites this paper
• Developing a Plume‐in‐Grid Model for Plume Evolution in the Stratosphere

  2022cites this paper
• How large is the design space for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering?

  2021cites this paper
• Updated and outdated reservations about research into stratospheric aerosol injection

  2021cites this paper
• Aerosol Dynamics in the Near Field of the SCoPEx Stratospheric Balloon Experiment

  2021cites this paper
• Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations

  2021cites this paper
• Uncertainties of Simulated Aerosol Direct Radiative Effect Induced by Aerosol Chemical Components: A Measurement‐Based Perspective From Urban‐Forest Transition Region in East China

  2021cites this paper
• High‐Latitude Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be More Effective if Injection Is Limited to Spring

  2021cites this paper
• Global climate disruption and regional climate shelters after the Toba supereruption

  2021cites this paper
• Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations

  2021cites this paper
• An Assessment of Barriers to MSMEs’ Adoption of CSA in Livestock Red Meat Value Chain, Kajiado County, Kenya

  2021cites this paper
• Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols

  2021cites this paper
• Expanding the design space of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering to include precipitation-based objectives and explore trade-offs

  2020cites this paper
• Estimating Impacts and Trade‐offs in Solar Geoengineering Scenarios With a Moist Energy Balance Model

  2020cites this paper
• Uncertainty and the basis for confidence in solar geoengineering research

  2020cites this paper
• Is Turning Down the Sun a Good Proxy for Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering?

  2020cites this paper
• Reduced Poleward Transport Due to Stratospheric Heating Under Stratospheric Aerosols Geoengineering

  2020cites this paper
• The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100

  2020cites this paper
• Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model

  2019cites this paper
• Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards

  2019cites this paper
• Mission-driven research for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering

  2019cites this paper
• Geoengineering and the blockchain: Coordinating Carbon Dioxide Removal and Solar Radiation Management to tackle future emissions

  2019cites this paper
• Holistic Assessment of SO2 Injections Using CESM1(WACCM): Introduction to the Special Issue

  2019influential citation
• Timescale for Detecting the Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering

  2019cites this paper
• Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance

  2019cites this paper
• The Reaction of Sulfur Dioxide Radical Cation with Hydrogen and its Relevance in Solar Geoengineering Models.

  2019cites this paper
• Climate system response to stratospheric sulfate aerosols: sensitivity to altitude of aerosol layer

  2019cites this paper
• Optimal Climate Strategy with Mitigation, Carbon Removal, and Solar Geoengineering

  2019cites this paper
• Soil Moisture and Other Hydrological Changes in a Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble

  2019cites this paper
• Seasonal Injection Strategies for Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering

  2019cites this paper
• Robust and adaptive control strategies for closed-loop climate engineering

  2019cites this paper
• Comparing Surface and Stratospheric Impacts of Geoengineering With Different SO2 Injection Strategies

  2019cites this paper
• Emerging risk governance for stratospheric aerosol injection as a climate management technology

  2019cites this paper
• Brief communication: Understanding solar geoengineering's potential to limit sea level rise requires attention from cryosphere experts

  2018cites this paper
• Understanding solar geoengineering ’ s potential to limit sea level rise requires attention from cryosphere 1 experts 2

  2018cites this paper
• Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment

  2018influential citation
• Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target

  2018cites this paper
• 1 . 5 ◦ C Paris target

  2018cites this paper
• Multiple input control strategies for robust and adaptive climate engineering in a low-order 3-box model

  2018cites this paper
• A continuous latitudinal energy balance model to explore non-uniform climate engineering strategies

  2016cites this paper