Risk perception, emotion and policy: the case of nuclear technology

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2003

• Venue

  Europaeum review

• Publication date

  2003-02-01

• Fields of study

  Political Science, Environmental Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1017/S1062798703000127
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Local Acceptance of a High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository

  2004influential reference
• Attitudes and Risk Perceptions of Stakeholders in a Nuclear Waste Siting Issue

  2003cited by this paper
• The Social Amplification of Risk: Contents

  2003cited by this paper
• The Different Dynamics of Personal and General Risk

  2003cited by this paper
• Risk Perception and New Age Beliefs

  2002cited by this paper
• The Allegedly Simple Structure of Experts’ Risk Perception: An Urban Legend in Risk Research

  2002cited by this paper
• Attitudes toward technology and risk: Going beyond what is immediately given

  2002cited by this paper
• Differences in Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk: Myth or Reality?

  2001cited by this paper
• Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository

  2001cited by this paper
• Political decisions and public risk perception

  2001influential reference
• Author's reply: whose risk perception should influence decisions?

  2001influential reference
• Consequences matter, ‘risk’ is marginal

  2000cited by this paper
• Consequences of perceived risk: Demand for mitigation

  1999cited by this paper
• Risk Perception: Experts and the Public

  1998cited by this paper
• Testing the Cultural Theory of Risk in France

  1998cited by this paper
• Worry and Risk Perception

  1998cited by this paper
• Explaining risk perception: an empirical evaluation of cultural theory

  1997cited by this paper
• Toxic Sludge Is Good for You! Lies, Damn Lies, and the Public Relations Industry

  1997cited by this paper
• The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1

  1996cited by this paper
• One Hundred Centuries of Solitude

  1995cited by this paper
• Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy.

  1993cited by this paper
• Risk Perception, Trust, and Nuclear Waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain

  1991cited by this paper
• Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada.

  1991cited by this paper
• Psychological reactions to cancer risks after the Chernobyl accident

  1987cited by this paper
• Risk, moral value of actions, and mood

  1986influential reference
• Technology assessment

  1984cited by this paper
• Risk and Culture

  1983cited by this paper
• Risk and Benefit Perceptions, Acceptability Judgments, and Self-Reported Actions toward Nuclear Power

  1982cited by this paper
• Volitional problems in carrying through a difficult decision

  1980cited by this paper
• Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences

  1980cited by this paper
• Strength of belief and risk

  1979cited by this paper
• How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits

  1978influential reference
• Social benefit versus technological risk.

  1969cited by this paper
• The Policy Sciences

  1953cited by this paper
• The psychology of learning

  1952cited by this paper

• Trust, Justice, and Expertise in Nuclear Waste Management: A Q-Method Analysis of Environmental Discourses in the United Kingdom

  2024cites this paper
• Blame avoidance of street-level bureaucrats in 5G NIMBY crisis decision making: Evidence from a list experiment

  2022cites this paper
• Framing climate change mitigation technology: The impact of risk versus benefit messaging on support for carbon capture and storage

  2022cites this paper
• Technical assistance in the field of risk communication

  2021cites this paper
• Nuclear Power Risk Perception in Serbia: Fear of Exposure to Radiation vs. Social Benefits

  2021cites this paper
• Understanding public support for carbon capture and storage policy: The roles of social capital, stakeholder perceptions, and perceived risk/benefit of technology

  2020cites this paper
• Knowledge about the Final Disposal of Nuclear Fuel in Sweden: Surveys to Members of Parliament and Citizens

  2020cites this paper
• Searching for the Next New Energy in Energy Transition: Comparing the Impacts of Economic Incentives on Local Acceptance of Fossil Fuels, Renewable, and Nuclear Energies

  2019cites this paper
• Influence of Emotions on the Acceptance of an Oil Drilling Project

  2018cites this paper
• Are farmers empowered? The role of empowerment in farmer decision making about weed and invertebrate management

  2017cites this paper
• Support, opposition, emotion and contentious issue risk perception

  2016cites this paper
• Exploring Attitude Change in Acceptance of Nuclear Power - The Use of the Conditional Stimuli Questions -

  2015cites this paper
• Judging Dread: A Quantitative Investigation of Affect, Psychometric Dread and Risk Consequence

  2015cites this paper
• Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste - Submission of Response to Joint Review Panel's Clarification Comments on Relative Risk Analysis of Community Acceptance in Information Request

  2014cites this paper
• A Comparative Study on Hyperlink Networks of Nuclear Energy in Korea, Japan, U.S.A. and France

  2013cites this paper
• Welcome waste – interpreting narratives of radioactive waste disposal in two small towns in Ontario, Canada

  2011cites this paper
• Proposta de um questionário destinado a avaliar a percepção de risco relativa a um repositório de rejeitos radioativos

  2011cites this paper
• Terrorism in Australia: Myth or reality? A psychometric study into the Western Australian public's perception of terrorism

  2010cites this paper
• Emotions Involved in Risk Perception: From Sociological and Psychological Risk Studies Towards a Neosentimentalist Meta-Ethics

  2010cites this paper
• The Perception of Risks of Technology

  2010cites this paper
• Actitudes públicas sobre los riesgos tecnológicos

  2009cites this paper
• Should we follow the experts' advice? Epistemic uncertainty, consequence dominance and the knowledge asymmetry of safety

  2009cites this paper
• G ENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD IN THE E YES O F THE P UBLIC AND E XPER T S

  2008cites this paper
• Risk Perception by Politicians and the Public

  2008cites this paper
• Attitudes as an Expression of Knowledge and “Political Anchoring”: The Case of Nuclear Power in the United Kingdom

  2008cites this paper
• Genetically Modified Food in The Eyes of the Public and Experts

  2008cites this paper
• Emotions and Risk Perception

  2007cites this paper
• Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions

  2007cites this paper
• Will the Real Meaning of Affect Please Stand Up?

  2006cites this paper
• Safety and Decision-making

  2006cites this paper
• MYTHS OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC PARADIGM AND HOW THEY CAN MISINFORM RISK COMMUNICATION

  2006cites this paper
• Lifestyles, and Risk Perception Consumer Behavior

  2005cites this paper
• The People and the Plan: Intended Reactions to a Nuclear Emergency in New York State

  2005cites this paper
• Local Acceptance of a High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository

  2004cites this paper
• Explaining Individual Risk Perception: The Case of Nuclear Waste

  2004cites this paper
• The evolution of the system of radiological protection: the justification for new ICRP recommendations.

  2003cites this paper
• Risk perception is not what it seems: The psychometric paradigm revisited

  2003cites this paper