Decentralized Erasure Coding for Efficient Data Archival in Distributed Storage Systems

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  International Conference of Distributed Computing and Networking

• Publication date

  2013-01-03

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Engineering

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-35668-1_4
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Erasure Coding in Windows Azure Storage

  2012cited by this paper
• RapidRAID: Pipelined erasure codes for fast data archival in distributed storage systems

  2012cited by this paper
• Peer-to-peer systems

  2010cited by this paper
• Availability in Globally Distributed Storage Systems

  2010cited by this paper
• Data warehousing and analytics infrastructure at facebook

  2010cited by this paper
• DiskReduce: RAID for data-intensive scalable computing

  2009cited by this paper
• Decentralized erasure codes for distributed networked storage

  2006cited by this paper
• Growth codes: maximizing sensor network data persistence

  2006cited by this paper
• High Availability in DHTs: Erasure Coding vs. Replication

  2005cited by this paper
• How good is random linear coding based distributed networked storage

  2005cited by this paper
• Peer-to-Peer Systems IV, 4th International Workshop, IPTPS 2005, Ithaca, NY, USA, February 24-25, 2005, Revised Selected Papers

  2005cited by this paper
• The Google file system

  2003cited by this paper
• Erasure Coding Vs. Replication: A Quantitative Comparison

  2002cited by this paper
• Polynomial Codes Over Certain Finite Fields

  1960cited by this paper

• Tree-structured data placement scheme with cluster-aided top-down transmission in erasure-coded distributed storage systems

  2022cites this paper
• RAIDP

  2020cites this paper
• RAIDP: replication with intra-disk parity

  2020cites this paper
• A Distributed Storage System Based on Blockchain and Pipelined Code

  2019cites this paper
• Incremental encoding for erasure-coded cross-datacenters cloud storage

  2018cites this paper
• Content Delivery Networks: Interactions between storage/delay/cost

  2018cites this paper
• A decentralized redundancy generation scheme for codes with locality in distributed storage systems

  2017cites this paper
• aHDFS: An Erasure-Coded Data Archival System for Hadoop Clusters

  2017cites this paper
• Online Encoding for Erasure-Coded Distributed Storage Systems

  2017influential citation
• Video Streaming in Distributed Erasure-Coded Storage Systems: Stall Duration Analysis

  2017cites this paper
• Efficient in-place update with grouped and pipelined data transmission in erasure-coded storage systems

  2017cites this paper
• Efficiently Coding Replicas to Erasure Coded Blocks in Distributed Storage Systems

  2017cites this paper
• Pipelined Online Data Insertion for Erasure Codes in Distributed Storage Systems

  2016influential citation
• Flexible replica placement for optimized P2P backup on heterogeneous, unreliable machines

  2016cites this paper
• Dynamic erasure coding decision for modern block-oriented distributed storage systems

  2016influential citation
• Thermal Management and Data Archiving in Data Centers

  2016cites this paper
• Exploiting Pipelined Encoding Process to Boost Erasure-Coded Data Archival

  2015cites this paper
• An Integrated Distributed Storage Design Offering Data Retrievability and Recoverability Using Soft Decision Decoding of Block Codes

  2015cites this paper
• Analysis of the fault tolerance of the distributed data storage with controlled redundancy

  2015cites this paper
• Locally Repairable RapidRAID Systematic Codes — One simple convoluted way to get it all

  2014cites this paper
• Storage codes: Managing big data with small overheads

  2013cites this paper
• Data Insertion and Archiving in Erasure-Coding Based Large-Scale Storage Systems

  2013cites this paper
• Exploring heterogeneity of unreliable machines for P2P backup

  2012cites this paper