Asilomar moments: formative framings in recombinant DNA and solar climate engineering research

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

• Publication date

  2014-12-28

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Physics, Political Science, Philosophy, Environmental Science, Sociology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1098/rsta.2014.0064PMID 25404678
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• IPCC Working Group III Technical Support Unit

  2016cited by this paper
• Remembering the Future: Science, Law and the Legacy of Asilomar

  2015cited by this paper
• Geoengineering and Climate Change Polarization: Testing a Two-channel Model of Science Communication

  2015cited by this paper
• Earth's future in the Anthropocene: Technological interventions between piecemeal and utopian social engineering

  2014cited by this paper
• Field experiments on solar geoengineering: report of a workshop exploring a representative research portfolio

  2014cited by this paper
• Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  2014cited by this paper
• CHAPTER 9:Solar Radiation Management and the Governance of Hubris

  2014cited by this paper
• Public Engagement with Biotechnologies Offers Lessons for the Governance of Geoengineering Research and Beyond

  2013cited by this paper
• The Truth About Geoengineering

  2013cited by this paper
• Prudence on solar climate engineering

  2013cited by this paper
• Field tests of solar climate engineering

  2013cited by this paper
• The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

  2013cited by this paper
• Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis

  2013cited by this paper
• Climate change 2013 : the physical science basis : Working Group I contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  2013cited by this paper
• A Curious Asymmetry: Social Science Expertise and Geoengineering

  2013cited by this paper
• End the Deadlock on Governance of Geoengineering Research

  2013influential reference
• The Paradox of Climate Engineering

  2013cited by this paper
• Living the global social experiment : an analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance.

  2013cited by this paper
• Why Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering and Democracy Won't Mix

  2013cited by this paper
• International Governance of Climate Engineering

  2013cited by this paper
• The Oxford Principles

  2013cited by this paper
• Public Perception of Geoengineering

  2012cited by this paper
• Geoengineering: re-making climate for profit or humanitarian intervention?

  2012cited by this paper
• Geoengineering and the Science Communication Environment: A Cross-Cultural Experiment

  2012cited by this paper
• Exploring early public responses to geoengineering

  2012cited by this paper
• Perceptions of geoengineering: public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement

  2012cited by this paper
• Reining in Phaëthon's Chariot: Principles for the Governance of Geoengineering

  2012cited by this paper
• Climate Geoengineering: Solar Radiation Management and its Implications for Intergenerational Equity

  2011cited by this paper
• Public understanding of solar radiation management

  2011cited by this paper
• Governing Climate Engineering: Scenarios for Analysis

  2011cited by this paper
• Does Geoengineering Need a Global Response - and of What Kind?

  2011cited by this paper
• Climate Geoengineering: Solar Radiation Management and its Implications for Intergenerational Equity

  2011cited by this paper
• Geoengineering and the Myth of Unilateralism: Pressures and Prospects for International Cooperation

  2011cited by this paper
• The Limitations of Geoengineering Governance In A World of Uncertainty

  2011cited by this paper
• Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control

  2011cited by this paper
• Environmental science: Good governance for geoengineering

  2011cited by this paper
• Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts

  2010cited by this paper
• Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy

  2010cited by this paper
• Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty

  2010cited by this paper
• Personal Reflections on the Origins and Emergence of Recombinant DNA Technology

  2010influential reference
• The Politics of Geoengineering

  2010cited by this paper
• Climate change 2007: the physical science basis

  2010cited by this paper
• Climate studies. 'Asilomar 2' takes small steps toward rules for geoengineering.

  2010cited by this paper
• Interpretation of CBD COP10 decision on geoengineering

  2010cited by this paper
• International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change

  2009cited by this paper
• The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone

  2009cited by this paper
• Whither Geoengineering?

  2008cited by this paper
• :Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States

  2008cited by this paper
• White Paper on Risk Governance: Toward an Integrative Framework

  2008cited by this paper
• Cancer, Viruses, and Mass Migration: Paul Berg’s Venture into Eukaryotic Biology and the Advent of Recombinant DNA Research and Technology, 1967–1980

  2008influential reference
• A Portfolio System of Climate Treaties

  2008cited by this paper
• On the regulation of geoengineering

  2008cited by this paper
• Biotechnology and the Creation of a New Economic Space

  2007cited by this paper
• Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?

  2006cited by this paper
• An Asilomar moment

  2002cited by this paper
• Making Dollars out of DNA: The First Major Patent in Biotechnology and the Commercialization of Molecular Biology, 1974-1980

  2001cited by this paper
• The First Twenty-Five Years after Asilomar

  2001cited by this paper
• Reflections on Asilomar 2 at Asilomar 3: Twenty-Five Years Later

  2001cited by this paper
• Private science : biotechnology and the rise of the molecular sciences

  1998cited by this paper
• Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States

  1998influential reference
• How Does A Policy Mean?: Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions

  1997cited by this paper
• Molecular politics: developing American and British regulatory policy for genetic engineering, 1972–1982

  1996cited by this paper
• The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework

  1988cited by this paper
• Recombinant DNA research: government regulation.

  1977cited by this paper
• Summary statement of the Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA molecules.

  1975cited by this paper
• Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules.

  1974cited by this paper
• Guidelines for DNA hybrid molecules.

  1973cited by this paper
• Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro.

  1973cited by this paper

• Editorial: Surviving the Anthropocene: the 3 E’s under pressing planetary issues

  2025cites this paper
• Eine Kontroverse auf Tape: Oral History, Zeug:innenschaft und Mythenbildung in der US-amerikanischen Gentechnikdebatte (1975–1980)

  2025cites this paper
• A conjunctural analysis of the origins of ‘embedded ELSI’ in U.S. genomic medicine

  2024cites this paper
• Ecology, ethology, and evolution in the Anthropocene

  2024cites this paper
• The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering

  2021cites this paper
• Fifteen Years of Controversy on Solar Geoengineering in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia

  2020cites this paper
• What Is Prudent Governance of Human Genome Editing?

  2019cites this paper
• Solar Geoengineering: Social Science, Legal, Ethical, and Economic Frameworks

  2019cites this paper
• Solar geoengineering to reduce climate change: a review of governance proposals

  2019cites this paper
• Ethics, Values, and Responsibility in Human Genome Editing

  2019cites this paper
• How scientists advising the European Commission on research priorities view climate engineering proposals

  2018cites this paper
• Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals

  2018cites this paper
• Coloring climates:imagining a geoengineered world

  2017cites this paper
• Moratoria for Global Governance and Contested Technology: The Case of Climate Engineering

  2016cites this paper
• The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World by Oliver Morton

  2016cites this paper
• The European Transdisciplinary Assessment of Climate Engineering (EuTRACE): Removing Greenhouse Gases from the Atmosphere and Reflecting Sunlight away from Earth. Final Report of the FP7 CSA project EuTRACE. Funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement 306993.

  2015cites this paper
• The European Transdisciplinary Assessment of Climate Engineering (EuTRACE): Removing Greenhouse Gases from the Atmosphere and Reflecting Sunlight away from Earth

  2015cites this paper
• Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget

  2014cites this paper