Report Binocular Advantages in Reading

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill.

  2013cited by this paper
• Individual differences in binocular coordination are uncovered by directly comparing monocular and binocular reading conditions.

  2012cited by this paper
• The effective fusional range for words in a natural viewing situation.

  2010cited by this paper
• The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search

  2009cited by this paper
• Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention

  2009cited by this paper
• Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading.

  2006cited by this paper
• Current advances in SWIFT

  2006cited by this paper
• Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines.

  2006cited by this paper
• Tests of the E-Z Reader model: exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control.

  2006cited by this paper
• Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading.

  2006cited by this paper
• SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

  2005cited by this paper
• The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

  2004cited by this paper
• The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models

  2003cited by this paper
• Reading Disappearing Text

  2003cited by this paper
• Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition

  2002cited by this paper
• Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS

  2002cited by this paper
• A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing.

  2002cited by this paper
• Saccadic eye movements and cognition.

  2000cited by this paper
• Eye Movements in Reading

  1999cited by this paper
• Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

  1998cited by this paper
• On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition

  1997cited by this paper
• Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus.

  1996cited by this paper
• The language instinct : how the mind creates language

  1995cited by this paper
• Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

  1990cited by this paper
• The Interaction of Word Frequency and Stimulus Quality in the Lexical Decision Task: Now you See It, Now you Don't

  1988cited by this paper
• Binocular vs. Monocular Task Performance

  1986cited by this paper
• The neurology of eye movements

  1984cited by this paper
• Vergence eye movements : basic and clinical aspects

  1983cited by this paper
• Further developments in binocular summation

  1981cited by this paper
• Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.

  1977cited by this paper
• The Perceptual Span and Peripheral Cues in Reading.

  1975cited by this paper

• The latent mechanism behind binocular advantage in reading

  2025influential citation
• Improvement of stereopsis following strabismus surgery in adults: a retrospective analysis.

  2025cites this paper
• Are There Binocular Advantages in Chinese Reading? Evidence from Eye Movements

  2023influential citation
• The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes.

  2022cites this paper
• FEM

  2020cites this paper
• Binocular coordination and return-sweep saccades among skilled adult readers.

  2019cites this paper
• Binocular coordination and return sweep saccades amongst skilled adult

  2019cites this paper
• The return-sweep in reading.

  2019cites this paper
• Education and visual neuroscience: A mini-review.

  2019cites this paper
• Okulomotorik – Motorik der Augen

  2019cites this paper
• Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria

  2019cites this paper
• Binocular advantages for parafoveal processing in reading

  2018cites this paper
• The word frequency effect during sentence reading: A linear or nonlinear effect of log frequency?

  2018cites this paper
• Literatur Messungen der Augenbewegungen bei MKH-Kreuztest-Prismen , Teil 1 Was genau messen wir da eigentlich ? Begrifflichkeiten neu interpretiert

  2018cites this paper
• Vertical disconjugacy during reading in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children.

  2018cites this paper
• Neural computation of depth from binocular disparity

  2018cites this paper
• Reading Single Words Aloud With Monocular Presentation: The Effect of Word Frequency

  2018influential citation
• Using a Dichoptic Moving Window Presentation Technique to Investigate Binocular Advantages During Reading

  2017influential citation
• Does Text Contrast Mediate Binocular Advantages in Reading?

  2017cites this paper
• The effect of spectacle treatment in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study

  2017cites this paper
• Simple reaction time and size–distance integration in virtual 3D space

  2017cites this paper
• Simple reaction time and size–distance integration in virtual 3D space

  2016cites this paper
• Investigations of binocularity and reading performance in healthy subjects and patients with mild traumatic brain injury

  2015influential citation
• Fixational eye movements: about a binocular slow control mechanism

  2015cites this paper
• Does Dyslexia Develop from Left-Eye Dominance?

  2015cites this paper
• Comprehension Skill Differences between Proficient and Less Proficient Reader in Word-to-Text Integration Processes: Implications for Interventions for Students with Reading Problem

  2015cites this paper