Comparing BMD results between two similar DXA systems using the generalized least significant change.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2008

• Venue

  Journal of clinical densitometry

• Publication date

  2008-04-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.02.001PMID 18455677
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems.

  2007cited by this paper
• Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.

  2006cited by this paper
• Long-Term Precision of DXA Scanning Assessed over Seven Years in Forty Postmenopausal Women

  2000cited by this paper
• Monitoring Skeletal Changes by Radiological Techniques

  1999cited by this paper
• Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

  1986cited by this paper

• 163. Post-injury Local Controlled Cooling Significantly Improves Functional Recovery After Volumetric Muscle Loss in Rats

  2025cites this paper
• Proposed practice parameters for the performance of radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) evaluations

  2025cites this paper
• Are muscle and fat loss predictive of clinical events in pancreatic cancer? The importance of precision metrics.

  2024cites this paper
• Short-Term Precision and Repeatability of Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) on Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur: An In Vivo Study

  2023cites this paper
• Measuring body fat—How accurate is the extrapolation of predictive models in epidemiology?

  2022cites this paper
• Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner mismatch in follow-up bone mineral density testing

  2022influential citation
• Cross-calibration of GE Lunar iDXA and Prodigy Densitometer for measurement of bone mineral density in young adults

  2020cites this paper
• Quantitative ultrasound for monitoring bone status in institutionalized adults with refractory epilepsy and intellectual disability: A 7-year follow-up study.

  2019cites this paper
• The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: Cross Calibration, Least Significant Change, and Quality Assurance in Multiple Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanner Environments.

  2019cites this paper
• Cross-calibration, Least Significant Change and Quality Assurance in Multiple Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanner Environments: 2019 ISCD Official Position

  2019cites this paper
• Legacy Biomarker Qualification Project Status Update

  2018cites this paper
• Bone Mineral Density Adult Age Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: A Test of the DXAGE Application

  2018cites this paper
• Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance.

  2016cites this paper
• Cross-Calibration of GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-Ray Densitometers for Bone Mineral Measurements

  2016cites this paper
• Effect of arteriovenous fistula and usage of arm with fistula on bone mineral density in hemodialysis patients

  2016cites this paper
• Cross-calibration of a GE iDXA and Prodigy for total and regional body bone parameters: the importance of using cross-calibration equations for longitudinal monitoring after a system upgrade.

  2014cites this paper
• Quality Assurance and Control in Dual‐energy X‐ray Absorptiometry

  2013cites this paper
• Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA

  2013cites this paper
• Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Osteoporosis

  2012cites this paper
• The effect of weight and weight change on the long-term precision of spine and hip DXA measurements

  2011cites this paper
• Cross-calibration and comparison of variability in 2 bone densitometers in a research setting: the framingham experience.

  2010cites this paper
• Posições oficiais 2008 da Sociedade Brasileira de Densitometria Clínica (SBDens)

  2009cites this paper
• [2008 official positions of the Brazilian Society for Clinical Densitometry--SBDens].

  2009cites this paper
• Comparing BMD results between 2 similar DXA systems using the generalized least significant change.

  2009cites this paper
• Bone turnover markers: understanding their value in clinical trials and clinical practice

  2009cites this paper