A New Procedure for Computing Equivalence Bands in Personnel Selection

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1998

• Venue

  Human Performance

• Publication date

  1998-12-01

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Business

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1207/S15327043HUP1104_4
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Statistical Power Computations for Detecting Dichotomous Moderator Variables with Moderated Multiple Regression

  1998cited by this paper
• Heterogeneity of Error Variance and the Assessment of Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables: A Conceptual Review

  1998cited by this paper
• Sampling variance in the correlation coefficient under indirect range restriction : Implications for validity generalization

  1997cited by this paper
• Methodological Artifacts in Moderated Multiple Regression and Their Effects on Statistical Power

  1997cited by this paper
• Sliding bands: An alternative to top-down selection.

  1996cited by this paper
• MODELING THE EFFECTS OF BANDING IN PERSONNEL SELECTION

  1995cited by this paper
• The Fatal Internal Contradiction in Banding: Its Statistical Rationale is Logically Inconsistent With Its Operational Procedures

  1995cited by this paper
• Evaluating the Logical Critique of Banding

  1995cited by this paper
• Twenty issues and Answers About sliding Bands

  1995influential reference
• Relation Between Performance and Banding

  1995cited by this paper
• Selective science or selective interpretation

  1995cited by this paper
• POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF BANDING AS A FUNCTION OF TEST RELIABILITY

  1994cited by this paper
• Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing.

  1994cited by this paper
• Estimating the Power to Detect Dichotomous Moderators with Moderated Multiple Regression

  1994cited by this paper
• Statistical Implications of Six Methods of Test Score Use in Personnel Selection

  1991cited by this paper
• Why All Banding Procedures in Personnel Selection Are Logically Flawed

  1991cited by this paper
• Why Do 'Testing Experts' Have Such Limited Vision?

  1991cited by this paper
• Structured Interviewing: Raising the Psychometric Properties of the Employment Interview.

  1988influential reference
• Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).

  1979cited by this paper
• Construct validity in psychological tests.

  1955cited by this paper

• Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe: Hire Him and Let Her Go? Using Science to Reduce Hiring Bias

  2021cites this paper
• High-Stakes Testing Case Study: A Latent Variable Approach for Assessing Measurement and Prediction Invariance

  2019cites this paper
• Creating Test Score Bands for Assessments Involving Ratings using a Generalizability Theory Approach to Reliability Estimation

  2018cites this paper
• A Statistical Correction to 20 Years of Banding

  2013cites this paper
• 7 Personnel Selection and Employee Performance

  2012cites this paper
• Corrections to Twenty Years of Banding : The Necessity of Precision

  2010influential citation
• Strong Rebuttal for Weak Criticisms: Reply to Blanton et al. (2009)

  2009cites this paper
• Human Resources Strategies for Fair and Legal Employee Selection

  2009cites this paper
• Weak Criticisms and Selective Evidence: Reply to Blanton et al. (2009)

  2009cites this paper
• Personnel Selection with Top-Score-Referenced Banding: On the Inappropriateness of Current Procedures

  2004cites this paper
• The Effects of Rejected Job Offers on the Costs and Benefits Associated with the Use of Banding Strategies for Employee Selection

  2004cites this paper
• The big five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages.

  2004cites this paper
• A Practical Procedure to Estimate the Quality and the Adverse Impact of Single-Stage Selection Decisions

  2003cites this paper
• Personnel Selection and Employee Performance

  2003cites this paper
• Virtual Reality Technology: A New Tool for Personnel Selection

  2001cites this paper
• PRIOR SELECTION CAUSES BIASED ESTIMATES OF STANDARDIZED ETHNIC GROUP DIFFERENCES: SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS

  2001cites this paper
• THE CONTROVERSY OVER SCORE BANDING IN PERSONNEL SELECTION: ANSWERS TO 10 KEY QUESTIONS

  2001cites this paper
• Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons Learned

  2001cites this paper
• Personnel selection: looking toward the future--remembering the past.

  2000cites this paper
• A Clarifying Note on Differences Between the W. F. Cascio, J. Outtz, S. Zedeck, and I. L. Goldstein (1991) and H. Aguinis, J. M. Cortina, and E. Goldberg (1998) Banding Procedures

  2000cites this paper
• Bounding the Concept of Test Banding: Reaffirming the Traditional Approach

  2000influential citation
• Industrial and Organizational Psychology Programme at the University of Colorado at Denver

  1997cites this paper
• Methodological Artifacts in Moderated Multiple Regression and Their Effects on Statistical Power

  1997cites this paper
• Personnel Assessment and Personnel Assessment and Decisions Decisions

  year unknowncites this paper