Mathematization, Not Measurement: A Critique of Stevens’ Scales of Measurement

Stevens redefined measurement as “the assignment of numerals to objects and events according to a rule.” Using this definition, he defined four scales of measurement (nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio) and set out criteria for the appropriate statistical tests to be used with each. Stevens’ paper has been influential in statistics for the social sciences, but it is not grounded in either science or mathematics and confuses measurement with labeling and mathematization. Mathematization using set theory obviates the need for Stevens’ ad hoc framework.

• Publication year

  2019

• Venue

  Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences

• Publication date

  2019-12-31

• Fields of study

  Mathematics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2412765
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Suppes’s outlines of an empirical measurement theory

  2016cited by this paper
• Likert is Pronounced "LICK-urt" not "LIE-kurt" and the Data are Ordinal not Interval.

  2016cited by this paper
• Regret Theory: A Bold Alternative to the Alternatives

  2015cited by this paper
• Transitivity of preferences.

  2011cited by this paper
• Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics

  2010influential reference
• Measurement Theory, Psychology and the Revolution That Cannot Happen

  2009cited by this paper
• The Rasch Model from the Perspective of the Representational Theory of Measurement

  2008cited by this paper
• Resolving the 50‐year debate around using and misusing Likert scales

  2008cited by this paper
• Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes

  2007cited by this paper
• Likert scales: how to (ab)use them

  2004influential reference
• Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept

  2002cited by this paper
• A meaningful justification for the representational theory of measurement

  2002cited by this paper
• Representational Measurement Theory

  2002cited by this paper
• Article Commentary: Abstract Measurement Theory and the Revolution that Never Happened

  1992cited by this paper
• Measurement scales and statistics: What can significance tests tell us about the world?

  1988cited by this paper
• Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms.

  1986influential reference
• Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception.

  1980cited by this paper
• BASIC SET THEORY

  1980cited by this paper
• Consequences of Failure

  1973cited by this paper
• Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance

  1972cited by this paper
• Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement

  1964cited by this paper
• Scales and statistics: parametric and nonparametric.

  1961cited by this paper
• Foundations of science : the philosophy of theory and experiment

  1957cited by this paper
• Additive scales and statistics.

  1953influential reference
• On the Statistical Treatment of Football Numbers.

  1953influential reference
• On the Theory of Scales of Measurement.

  1946influential reference
• Pseudo-Mathematics in the Mental and Social Sciences

  1936influential reference
• Quantitative Estimates of Sensory Events

  1932cited by this paper
• Theory of attitude measurement.

  1929cited by this paper
• Electrical Units of Measurement

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Psychology's Questionable Research Fundamentals (QRFs): Key problems in quantitative psychology and psychological measurement beyond Questionable Research Practices (QRPs)

  2025cites this paper
• Quantification des relations entre variables catégorielles ordinales Application aux métriques suivies par les baromètres de satisfaction

  2025cites this paper
• Stevens’ measurement scales in marketing research – A continuation of discussion on whether researchers can ignore the Likert scale’s limitations as an ordinal scale

  2025cites this paper
• Quantifying relationships between ordinal categorical variables: Application to metrics tracked by satisfaction barometers

  2025cites this paper
• Statistics is not measurement: The inbuilt semantics of psychometric scales and language-based models obscures crucial epistemic differences

  2025cites this paper
• Classification and analysis of quantitative and qualitative variables in fluoride monitoring data collected from animal feed products

  2025cites this paper
• Measurement and Mind: Unveiling the Self-Delusion of Metrification in Psychology

  2024cites this paper
• Good, Bad, or Not-Even-Wrong Science and Mathematics in Transpersonal Psychology: Comment on Rock et al.'s "Is Biological Death Final?"

  2023cites this paper
• Towards Ordinal Data Science

  2023cites this paper
• Composition of Probabilistic Preferences in Multicriteria Problems with Variables Measured in Likert Scales and Fitted by Empirical Distributions

  2023cites this paper
• Are Misunderstandings over “Risk” Contributing to Difficulties in Assessing and Managing Safety in the Public Domain?

  2022cites this paper
• Functions of units, scales and quantitative data: Fundamental differences in numerical traceability between sciences

  2021cites this paper