A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS TO ADJUST WEIGHTS FOR NON-RESPONSE: PROPENSITY MODELING AND WEIGHTING CLASS ADJUSTMENTS

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2001

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Economics

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• No references are available for this paper.

• Child maltreatment and cognitive and academic functioning in two generations.

  2021cites this paper
• Likelihood Approach for Bayesian Logistic Weighted Model

  2020cites this paper
• Effectiveness of protective clothing for motorized 2-wheeler riders

  2019cites this paper
• Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries?

  2019cites this paper
• Adjusting for non-response in the Finnish Drinking Habits Survey

  2019cites this paper
• Evaluating the risk of nonresponse bias in educational large-scale assessments with school nonresponse questionnaires: a theoretical study

  2017cites this paper
• Daily Access to Local Foods for School Meals: Key Drivers

  2017cites this paper
• Painotusmenetelmät survey aineiston muuttujien estimoimiseen

  2017cites this paper
• The Effect of Social Security Information on the Labor Supply and Savings of Older Americans

  2016cites this paper
• Perceived impact of environmental barriers on participation among people living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland.

  2016cites this paper
• Prevalence and determinants of idiopathic scoliosis in primary school children in Beitang district, Wuxi, China.

  2016cites this paper
• Are proxy interviews associated with biased earnings reports? Marital status and gender effects of proxy.

  2013cites this paper
• The adoption of customer relationship management (CRM) technology in SMEs: an empirical study

  2013cites this paper
• Use of inverse probability weighting to adjust for non-participation in estimating brain volumes in schizophrenia patients.

  2011cites this paper
• A profile of social security child beneficiaries and their families: sociodemographic and economic characteristics.

  2011cites this paper
• [A comparison of two methods to adjust for non-response bias: field substitution and weighting non-response adjustments based on response propensity].

  2009cites this paper
• Comparación de dos métodos para corregir el sesgo de no respuesta a una encuesta: sustitución muestral y ajuste según propensión a responder

  2009cites this paper
• Weighting Class versus Propensity Model Approaches to Nonresponse Adjustment: The SDR Experience

  2008cites this paper
• Using Telephone Exchange-Level Data To Adjust For Non-Response : Application In An Establishment Survey

  2006cites this paper
• An Application of Propensity Modeling : Comparing Unweighted and Weighted Logistic Regression Models for Nonresponse Adjustments

  2006cites this paper
• Adjusting for Nonresponse in the Healthcare Survey of DoD Beneficiaries

  2005cites this paper
• Logistic Propensity Models to Adjust for Nonresponse in Physician Surveys. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

  2002cites this paper
• An assessment of the utility of a Bayesian framework to improve response propensity modes in longitudinal data

  year unknowncites this paper