Who Reaps the Benefits, Who Bears the Risks? Comparative Optimism, Comparative Utility, and Regulatory Preferences for Mobile Phone Technology

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  Risk Analysis

• Publication date

  2007-06-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00881.xPMID 17640220
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Using Surveys in Public Participation Processes for Risk Decision Making: The Case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate

  2005cited by this paper
• Comparative optimism for environmental risks

  2005cited by this paper
• Perception of Mobile Phone and Base Station Risks

  2005influential reference
• Trust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food?

  2005influential reference
• Risk Perceptions of Mobile Phone Use While Driving

  2004cited by this paper
• GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception

  2004cited by this paper
• The Social Amplification of Risk: Understanding amplification of complex risk issues: the risk story model applied to the EMF case

  2003cited by this paper
• Exploring the causes of comparative optimism.

  2002influential reference
• Factors in risk perception.

  2000influential reference
• Factors in Risk Perception

  2000cited by this paper
• Present and Future

  2000cited by this paper
• Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.

  1999cited by this paper
• Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.

  1999cited by this paper
• Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit, and Ethics

  1997cited by this paper
• Unrealistic Optimism: Present and Future

  1996cited by this paper
• Sufficient grounds for optimism? The relationship between perceived controllability and optimistic bias

  1996cited by this paper
• Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect.

  1995cited by this paper
• Perceiving AIDS-related risk: accuracy as a function of differences in actual risk.

  1994cited by this paper
• Perceiving AIDS-related risks: accuracy as a function of differences in actual risk

  1994cited by this paper
• Exploring the limits of optimism: the case of smokers' decision making.

  1993influential reference
• The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework

  1988cited by this paper
• Perception of risk.

  1987cited by this paper
• Unrealistic optimism about future life events

  1980influential reference
• How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits

  1978cited by this paper

• RF‐EMF Risk Perception and Trust in Radiation Protection Authorities: A Comparative Study on Precautionary Information in Germany and Greece

  2026cites this paper
• Distracted on duty: A theory-based exploration of influences leading to mobile phone distracted riding among food delivery workers.

  2024cites this paper
• The determinants of legislation for radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF‐EMFs) with the onset of 5G: An empirical analysis with a worldwide cross‐sectional dataset

  2024cites this paper
• Mobile phone use while driving in Finland

  2022cites this paper
• Understanding child and adolescent cyberbullying

  2021cites this paper
• Mobile phone applications use while driving in Ukraine: Self-reported frequencies and psychosocial factors underpinning this risky behaviour

  2021cites this paper
• Mobile Telephony: The Influencing Factors of Using A Mobile Phone by Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Three Global Countries

  2020cites this paper
• Who uses a mobile phone while driving for food delivery? The role of personality, risk perception, and driving self-efficacy.

  2020cites this paper
• Mobile phone involvement, beliefs, and texting while driving in Ukraine.

  2019cites this paper
• Design characteristics of a workload manager to aid drivers in safety–critical situations

  2018cites this paper
• The Public's Reactions to Precaution - On the Effects of Health Recommendations Regarding Wireless Communication Technologies

  2018cites this paper
• Predicting intentions to text and call while driving using the theory of planned behaviour

  2018cites this paper
• The Belief and Attitude of the Drivers Toward the Usage of Cellphone while Driving; A Population-Based Survey.

  2017cites this paper
• Why drivers use cell phones and support legislation to restrict this practice.

  2016cites this paper
• hy drivers use cell phones and support legislation to restrict this ractice

  2016influential citation
• The Key Role of Experiential Uncertainty when Dealing with Risks: Its Relationships with Demand for Regulation and Institutional Trust

  2016cites this paper
• Understanding Perceived Risk: Perceptions of and responses to mobile phones, base stations, and other sources of electromagnetic fields

  2015influential citation
• Modeling Retrospective Attribution of Responsibility to Hazard‐Managing Institutions: An Example Involving a Food Contamination Incident

  2015cites this paper
• Cell Phone Conversation While Driving

  2015cites this paper
• Adolescents’ Perceptions of Family Violence Risks

  2014cites this paper
• Distracted Driving: The New Alcohol. A Case Study of a Rising Public Health Issue in British Columbia

  2014cites this paper
• Examining strategies for reducing cell phone use while driving: Investigating the potential of targeting non-driving participants of cell phone conversations and testing the utility of techniques for reducing habitual responses to cell phones

  2014influential citation
• Behavioural Real Estate

  2013cites this paper
• Factors affecting drivers willingness to engage with a mobile phone while driving

  2013cites this paper
• People’s responses to risks of electromagnetic fields and trust in government policy: the role of perceived risk, benefits and control

  2013cites this paper
• The prevalence of cell phone use while driving in a Canadian province

  2013cites this paper
• TI 13-088 / IV / DSF 58 Behavioural Real Estate

  2013cites this paper
• [Risk perception of the general public of cell phone towers and cancer: trend and associated factors, 2005-2010].

  2012cites this paper
• The Personality Correlates of Driving While Intexticated

  2012cites this paper
• Fear and anger: antecedents and consequences of emotional responses to mobile communication

  2012cites this paper
• Optimistic bias about dating/relationship violence among teens

  2012cites this paper
• Antennes-relais et cancer : évolution et déterminants du risque perçu par le public, 2005-2010

  2012cites this paper
• Cell Phones and Health Concerns: Impact of Knowledge and Voluntary Precautionary Recommendations

  2011cites this paper
• Protesting Mobile Phone Masts: Risk, Neoliberalism, and Governmentality

  2011cites this paper
• EMF recommendations specific for children?

  2011cites this paper
• Perceptions of health risks and benefits associated with fish consumption among Russian consumers.

  2011cites this paper
• Optimistic bias about intimate partner violence among medical personnel.

  2011cites this paper
• WHO research agenda for radiofrequency fields

  2011cites this paper
• Illustrating Risk: Anaphylaxis Through the Eyes of the Food‐Allergic Child

  2011cites this paper
• Perception of health risks of electromagnetic fields by MRI radiographers and airport security officers compared to the general Dutch working population: a cross sectional analysis

  2011cites this paper
• Risk Perception and Movies: A Study of Availability as a Factor in Risk Perception

  2010cites this paper
• Consumer responses to risk-benefit information about food

  2010cites this paper
• Examining the Relationship Between Affect and Implicit Associations: Implications for Risk Perception

  2010cites this paper
• “SOCIAL COGNITION IN ACTION” BOOK WITH PUBLICATIONS

  2010influential citation
• Perceived risk and benefit for self and others as predictors of smokers' attitudes towards smoking restrictions

  2010cites this paper
• Mobile phone use while driving: An investigation of the beliefs influencing drivers' hands-free and hand-held mobile phone use

  2010cites this paper
• Risk perception of mobile communication: a mental models approach

  2010cites this paper
• The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving.

  2009cites this paper
• “Trust me, I'm a Scientist (Not a Developer)”: Perceived Expertise and Motives as Predictors of Trust in Assessment of Risk from Contaminated Land

  2009influential citation
• Mobile phone use Mobile phone use while driving : An investigation of the beliefs influencing drivers ’ hands-free and hand-held mobile phone use

  2009cites this paper
• The Trust Paradox: The Role of Context Effects in Stated Trust Judgements

  2007cites this paper