A Different Look at the Quality of Modeled Three-Dimensional protein Structures

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2008

• Venue

  J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol.

• Publication date

  2008-04-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Chemistry, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1142/S0219720008003424PMID 18464326
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Monte-Carlo Simulation

  2022cited by this paper
• Improving the quality of protein structure models by selecting from alignment alternatives

  2006cited by this paper
• All are not equal: A benchmark of different homology modeling programs

  2005cited by this paper
• Assessment of CASP6 predictions for new and nearly new fold targets

  2005cited by this paper
• Assessment of fold recognition predictions in CASP6

  2005cited by this paper
• Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP6 comparative modeling category

  2005cited by this paper
• LiveBench‐8: The large‐scale, continuous assessment of automated protein structure prediction

  2005cited by this paper
• Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores

  2005cited by this paper
• Protein structure prediction in CASP6 using CHIMERA and FAMS

  2005cited by this paper
• Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality

  2004cited by this paper
• SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server

  2003cited by this paper
• CAFASP3: The third critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods

  2003cited by this paper
• Automated prediction of CASP‐5 structures using the Robetta server

  2003cited by this paper
• Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling

  2003cited by this paper
• A normalized root‐mean‐spuare distance for comparing protein three‐dimensional structures

  2001cited by this paper
• MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality

  2000cited by this paper
• An automatic homology modeling method consisting of database searches and simulated annealing.

  2000cited by this paper
• Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions

  1999cited by this paper
• Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices.

  1993cited by this paper
• Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints.

  1993cited by this paper
• A new approach to protein fold recognition

  1992cited by this paper
• Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching.

  1992cited by this paper
• A database of protein structure families with common folding motifs

  1992cited by this paper
• Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles

  1992cited by this paper
• A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins.

  1970cited by this paper

• Optimal Pairwise Alignment of Fixed protein Structures in Subquadratic Time

  2011cites this paper
• The Janus-Faced E-Values of Hmmer2: Extreme Value Distribution or logistic Function?

  2011cites this paper
• Recent advances on structural bioinformatics, cell motion simulation, functional module identification, copy number variation, and protease substrate prediction and some critical comments on HMMER2.

  2011cites this paper
• Protein Structure Alignment in Subquadratic Time

  2010cites this paper