The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Acta Psychologica

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.004PMID 23261421
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.

  2011cited by this paper
• The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.

  2011influential reference
• Contingency learning and unlearning in the blink of an eye: a resource dependent process.

  2010cited by this paper
• Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Why It Is too Early to Lose Control in Accounts of Item-Specific Proportion Congruency Effects

  2010influential reference
• The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.

  2008influential reference
• Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task

  2008cited by this paper
• Hebbian learning of cognitive control: dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation.

  2008cited by this paper
• Contingency learning without awareness: evidence for implicit control.

  2007cited by this paper
• Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: a computational model.

  2007cited by this paper
• The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue

  2006cited by this paper
• Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations

  2003influential reference
• Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions

  2001influential reference
• Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

  2001cited by this paper
• 18. Selective attention and internal constraints: there is more to the flanker effect than biased contingencies

  1996cited by this paper
• Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events

  1996cited by this paper
• Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.

  1994cited by this paper
• Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.

  1992cited by this paper
• Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

  1991influential reference
• Similarity , Frequency , and Category Representations

  1988cited by this paper
• Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.

  1988cited by this paper
• Toward an instance theory of automatization.

  1988cited by this paper
• Exemplar-Based Accounts of Relations Between Classification, Recognition, and Typicality

  1988cited by this paper
• Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters

  1987cited by this paper
• "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model

  1986cited by this paper
• Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.

  1986cited by this paper
• Array models for category learning.

  1986cited by this paper
• MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory

  1984cited by this paper
• Selective and divided Attention in a Stroop task.

  1982cited by this paper
• Context theory of classification learning.

  1978influential reference
• A Theory of Memory Retrieval.

  1978cited by this paper

• Editorial for the special issue entitled: Mechanisms of control in selective attention tasks

  2025cites this paper
• The Effect of Attentional Locus on Multisensory Congruence: An ERP Study

  2025cites this paper
• No pupillometric evidence for effortful proactive control in the proportion-congruent Stroop paradigm

  2024influential citation
• DİKKAT, BİLİŞSEL KONTROL VE UYUMLULUK ORANI ETKİLERİ

  2024cites this paper
• Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning

  2024influential citation
• A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes

  2024influential citation
• Is conflict adaptation adaptive? An introduction to conflict monitoring theory and the ecological problems it faces

  2023influential citation
• Target–distractor correlation does not imply causation of the Stroop effect

  2023influential citation
• On the relationship between emotions and cognitive control: Evidence from an observational study on emotional priming Stroop task

  2023cites this paper
• Contingency learning and episodic contributions to the item-specific proportion congruent effect

  2023influential citation
• Dissociating selectivity adjustments from temporal learning–introducing the context-dependent proportion congruency effect

  2022cites this paper
• Accounting for Proportion Congruency Effects in the Stroop Task in a Confounded Setup: Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Episodes Explains it All

  2022cites this paper
• Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking

  2022cites this paper
• Being in the Know: The Role of Awareness and Retrieval of Transient Stimulus-Response Bindings in Selective Contingency Learning

  2022cites this paper
• Fluid Intelligence Emerges from Representing Relations

  2022cites this paper
• . (2022). Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.

  2022cites this paper
• . (2022). Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.

  2022cites this paper
• Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming

  2022cites this paper
• When Data Transformations are Appropriate or Even Necessary: A Response to Cohen-Shikora, Suh and Bugg (2019)

  2021influential citation
• Proportion of conflict, contingency learning, and recency effects in a Stroop task

  2021cites this paper
• The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task

  2021cites this paper
• No evidence for the reduction of task competition and attentional adjustment during task-switching practice.

  2020cites this paper
• Reinforcement learning of irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulates cognitive control.

  2020cites this paper
• Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory

  2020cites this paper
• An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory

  2020cites this paper
• Has “Erasing” Made Things Clearer? Commentary on Schmidt, Liefooghe & De Houwer (): “An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory”

  2020cites this paper
• Delta Phase Reset Predicts Conflict-Related Changes in P3 Amplitude and Behavior.

  2020cites this paper
• Does conflict resolution rely on working memory?

  2020cites this paper
• Adaptation to conflict frequency without contingency and temporal learning: Evidence from the picture-word interference task.

  2019influential citation
• Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches

  2019cites this paper
• Learning simple associations.

  2019influential citation
• Additive Effects of Item-Specific and Congruency Sequence Effects in the Vocal Stroop Task

  2019cites this paper
• Execution-based and verbal code-based stimulus–response associations: proportion manipulations reveal conflict adaptation processes in item-specific priming

  2019cites this paper
• Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect

  2019influential citation
• Inspired by the past and looking to the future of the Stroop effect.

  2018cites this paper
• Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review

  2018influential citation
• Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise

  2018influential citation
• Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying inhibitory control in 5- to 10-year-olds and adults.

  2018cites this paper
• Contingency proportion systematically influences contingency learning

  2018cites this paper
• Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect

  2018cites this paper
• The Acquisition of Simple Associations as Observed in Color–Word Contingency Learning

  2018cites this paper
• Time-Out for Conflict Monitoring Theory: Preventing Rhythmic Biases Eliminates the List-Level Proportion Congruent Effect

  2017cites this paper
• Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries

  2017cites this paper
• The Role of RT Carry-Over for Congruence Sequence Effects in Masked Priming

  2017cites this paper
• ERP evidence for conflict in contingency learning.

  2017cites this paper
• Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific

  2017cites this paper
• Relative speed of processing determines color–word contingency learning

  2017cites this paper
• Psychological engineering: A functional-cognitive perspective on applied psychology.

  2017cites this paper
• Context, Conflict, and Control

  2017cites this paper
• Different mechanisms can account for the instruction induced proportion congruency effect.

  2017cites this paper
• Temporal and spectral dynamics underlying cognitive control modulated by task-irrelevant stimulus-response learning

  2017cites this paper
• Properties of context-driven control revealed through the analysis of sequential congruency effects.

  2017influential citation
• Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects

  2016cites this paper
• Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying cognitive control.

  2016cites this paper
• Temporal Learning and Rhythmic Responding: No Reduction in the Proportion Easy Effect with Variable Response-Stimulus Intervals

  2016influential citation
• Time course of colour-word contingency learning: Practice curves, pre-exposure benefits, unlearning, and relearning

  2016cites this paper
• An integrated utility-based model of conflict evaluation and resolution in the Stroop task.

  2016cites this paper
• The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model 2.0: A single computational model of stimulus-response binding, contingency learning, power curves, and mixing costs.

  2016influential citation
• Context-Specific Proportion Congruency Effects: An Episodic Learning Account and Computational Model

  2016influential citation
• ERP correlates of the conflict level in the multi-response Stroop task.

  2016cites this paper
• Contingency learning is reduced for high conflict stimuli.

  2016influential citation
• Implicitly strengthened task‐irrelevant stimulus‐response associations modulate cognitive control: Evidence from an fMRI study

  2016cites this paper
• Proportion congruency and practice: A contingency learning account of asymmetric list shifting effects.

  2016influential citation
• Contingency learning is not affected by conflict experience: Evidence from a task conflict-free, item-specific Stroop paradigm.

  2016cites this paper
• Contingency Learning Tracks With Stimulus-Response Proportion.

  2016cites this paper
• Temporal and spectral dynamics underlying cognitive control modulated by task-irrelevant stimulus-response learning

  2016cites this paper
• Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific

  2016cites this paper
• Grounding cognitive control in associative learning.

  2016cites this paper
• Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect

  2016cites this paper
• Interactive effects of working memory and trial history on Stroop interference in cognitively healthy aging.

  2015cites this paper
• Is conflict adaptation an illusion?

  2015cites this paper
• The relative attractiveness of distractors and targets affects the coming and going of item-specific control: Evidence from flanker tasks

  2015cites this paper
• Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: conflict adaptation or temporal learning?

  2015cites this paper
• Practice and colour-word integration in Stroop interference

  2015influential citation
• Running head : CONTINGENCY LEARNING 1 Contingency Learning Tracks with Stimulus-Response Proportion : No Evidence of Misprediction Costs

  2015cites this paper
• Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task

  2014cites this paper
• Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Unconscious Conflicts in Unconscious Contexts: The Role of Awareness and Timing in Flexible Conflict Adaptation

  2014cites this paper
• List-level transfer effects in temporal learning: Further complications for the list-level proportion congruent effect

  2014influential citation
• Contextual influences on the sequential congruency effect

  2014cites this paper
• ISPC effect is not observed when the word comes too late: a time course analysis

  2014cites this paper
• Resolved but not forgotten: Stroop conflict dredges up the past

  2014cites this paper
• The role of visual awareness for conflict adaptation in the masked priming task: comparing block-wise adaptation with trial-by-trial adaptation

  2014influential citation
• Context-specific temporal learning with non-conflict stimuli: proof-of-principle for a learning account of context-specific proportion congruent effects

  2014influential citation
• Contingencies and attentional capture: the importance of matching stimulus informativeness in the item-specific proportion congruent task

  2014cites this paper
• Proportion congruency effects: instructions may be enough

  2014cites this paper
• Conflict components of the Stroop effect and their “control”

  2014cites this paper
• Conflict adjustment devoid of perceptual selection.

  2013cites this paper
• Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered

  2013influential citation
• Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect.

  2013cites this paper
• Contextual influences on the sequential congruency effect

  2013cites this paper
• Temporal Learning and List-Level Proportion Congruency: Conflict Adaptation or Learning When to Respond?

  2013influential citation
• Non-perceptual conflict adjustment Conflict adjustment devoid of perceptual selection

  2013cites this paper
• Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered

  2013cites this paper