Visigoth fault tolerance

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  European Conference on Computer Systems

• Publication date

  2015-04-17

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Engineering

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1145/2741948.2741979
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Lower Bound and Correctness Proofs for Consensus in the Visigoth Model

  2015influential reference
• Reconciling high server utilization and sub-millisecond quality-of-service

  2014cited by this paper
• DIBS: just-in-time congestion mitigation for data centers

  2014cited by this paper
• In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm

  2014cited by this paper
• Bobtail: Avoiding Long Tails in the Cloud

  2013cited by this paper
• There is more consensus in Egalitarian parliaments

  2013cited by this paper
• Tolerating permanent and transient value faults

  2013cited by this paper
• CheapBFT: resource-efficient byzantine fault tolerance

  2012cited by this paper
• Practical Hardening of Crash-Tolerant Systems

  2012cited by this paper
• Spanner: Google's Globally-Distributed Database

  2012cited by this paper
• Zab: High-performance broadcast for primary-backup systems

  2011cited by this paper
• Jellyfish: Networking Data Centers Randomly

  2011cited by this paper
• Better never than late: meeting deadlines in datacenter networks

  2011cited by this paper
• Introduction to Reliable and Secure Distributed Programming

  2011cited by this paper
• Megastore: Providing Scalable, Highly Available Storage for Interactive Services

  2011cited by this paper
• ZZ and the art of practical BFT execution

  2011cited by this paper
• ZooKeeper: Wait-free Coordination for Internet-scale Systems

  2010cited by this paper
• Upright cluster services

  2009cited by this paper
• Microsoft Research Silicon Valley

  2009cited by this paper
• AN-Encoding Compiler: Building Safety-Critical Systems with Commodity Hardware

  2009cited by this paper
• Improving MapReduce Performance in Heterogeneous Environments

  2008cited by this paper
• Autopilot: automatic data center management

  2007cited by this paper
• Tolerating corrupted communication

  2007cited by this paper
• Beyond One-Third Faulty Replicas in Byzantine Fault Tolerant Systems

  2007cited by this paper
• The Chubby lock service for loosely-coupled distributed systems

  2006cited by this paper
• SWIFT: software implemented fault tolerance

  2005cited by this paper
• How to tolerate half less one Byzantine nodes in practical distributed systems

  2004cited by this paper
• Web Site Delays: How Tolerant are Users?

  2004influential reference
• Uncertainty and Predictability: Can They Be Reconciled?

  2003cited by this paper
• The Timely Computing Base Model and Architecture

  2002cited by this paper
• Practical byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery

  2002influential reference
• Paxos Made Simple

  2001cited by this paper
• Using the Heartbeat Failure Detector for Quiescent Reliable Communication and Consensus in Partitionable Networks

  1999cited by this paper
• The timed asynchronous distributed system model

  1998cited by this paper
• Solving Consensus in a Byzantine Environment Using an Unreliable Fault Detector

  1997cited by this paper
• Unreliable intrusion detection in distributed computations

  1997cited by this paper
• Byzantine quorum systems

  1997cited by this paper
• Interactive services

  1996cited by this paper
• Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems

  1996cited by this paper
• "Gamma-Accurate" Failure Detectors

  1996cited by this paper
• Sharing memory robustly in message-passing systems

  1990cited by this paper
• Implementing fault-tolerant services using the state machine approach: a tutorial

  1990cited by this paper
• Time is Not a Healer

  1989cited by this paper
• Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony

  1988cited by this paper
• Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process

  1985cited by this paper
• The Byzantine Generals Problem

  1982cited by this paper
• Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control

  1974cited by this paper

• Proteus: Append-Only Ledgers for (Mostly) Trusted Execution Environments

  2026cites this paper
• Message Size Matters: AlterBFT’s Approach to Practical Synchronous BFT in Public Clouds

  2025cites this paper
• The case for synchronous distributed protocols in public clouds

  2025cites this paper
• FPS: Flexible Payment System

  2025cites this paper
• Ordered Consensus with Equal Opportunity

  2025cites this paper
• Hard Shell, Reliable Core: Improving Resilience in Replicated Systems with Selective Hybridization

  2025influential citation
• Granular Synchrony

  2024cites this paper
• The Bedrock of Byzantine Fault Tolerance: A Unified Platform for BFT Protocols Analysis, Implementation, and Experimentation

  2024cites this paper
• Chemistry behind Agreement

  2023cites this paper
• Hybrid Block Storage for Efficient Cloud Volume Service

  2023cites this paper
• The Bedrock of BFT: A Unified Platform for BFT Protocol Design and Implementation

  2022cites this paper
• The Bedrock of Byzantine Fault Tolerance: A Unified Platform for BFT Protocol Design and Implementation

  2022cites this paper
• SplitBFT: Improving Byzantine Fault Tolerance Safety Using Trusted Compartments

  2022cites this paper
• Reaching Consensus in the Byzantine Empire: A Comprehensive Review of BFT Consensus Algorithms

  2022cites this paper
• Byzantine Fault-tolerant State-machine Replication from a Systems Perspective

  2021cites this paper
• Avocado: A Secure In-Memory Distributed Storage System

  2021cites this paper
• BigFooT: A robust optimal-latency BFT blockchain consensus protocol with dynamic validator membership

  2021cites this paper
• the Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation

  2020cites this paper
• DORY: An Encrypted Search System with Distributed Trust

  2020cites this paper
• Byzantine Ordered Consensus without Byzantine Oligarchy

  2020cites this paper
• Modern Large-Scale Data Management Systems after 40 Years of Consensus

  2020cites this paper
• Networked Systems

  2020cites this paper
• From Byzantine Consensus to Blockchain Consensus

  2019cites this paper
• SeeMoRe: A Fault-Tolerant Protocol for Hybrid Cloud Environments

  2019cites this paper
• URSA: Hybrid Block Storage for Cloud-Scale Virtual Disks

  2019cites this paper
• Generalized Consensus for Practical Fault Tolerance

  2019cites this paper
• Can 100 Machines Agree?

  2019cites this paper
• SBFT: a Scalable Decentralized Trust Infrastructure for Blockchains

  2018cites this paper
• Byzantine state machine replication for the masses

  2018cites this paper
• The Tortoise and the Hare: Characterizing Synchrony in Distributed Environments (Practical Experience Report)

  2018influential citation
• Dynamic adaptation of byzantine consensus protocols

  2018cites this paper
• SBFT: A Scalable and Decentralized Trust Infrastructure

  2018cites this paper
• Dynamic Adaptation of Byzantine Fault Tolerant Protocols

  2017cites this paper
• Hardware-Assisted Dependable Systems

  2017cites this paper
• Making data center computations fast, but not so furious

  2017influential citation
• HAFT: hardware-assisted fault tolerance

  2016cites this paper
• ClusterOn: Building Highly Configurable and Reusable Clustered Data Services Using Simple Data Nodes

  2016cites this paper
• XFT: Practical Fault Tolerance beyond Crashes

  2015cites this paper
• Resource-Aware System Software for Replicated Services

  year unknowncites this paper
• Tough on the Outside, Reliable on the Inside: Utilizing System Composition for Improved Resilience

  year unknowncites this paper
• This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 2022 USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

  year unknowncites this paper