Testing Best Practices to Reduce the Overconfidence Bias in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

• Publication date

  2016-01-05

• Fields of study

  Business, Economics, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2016.195
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis

  2015cited by this paper
• Overprecision in Judgment

  2015cited by this paper
• The appeal of vague financial forecasts

  2011cited by this paper
• A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment.

  2010cited by this paper
• Betting on own knowledge: Experimental test of overconfidence

  2009cited by this paper
• An Experimental Test of the Impact of Overconfidence and Gender on Trading Activity

  2009cited by this paper
• The trouble with overconfidence.

  2008cited by this paper
• A Comparison of Two Probability Encoding Methods: Fixed Probability vs. Fixed Variable Values

  2008cited by this paper
• Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxide

  2008cited by this paper
• Interior Additivity and Subjective Probability Assessment of Continuous Variables

  2008cited by this paper
• Overconfidence in interval estimates: What does expertise buy you?

  2008cited by this paper
• Social comparison and confidence: When thinking you’re better than average predicts overconfidence (and when it does not)

  2007cited by this paper
• The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.

  2007cited by this paper
• Aligning confidence with accuracy: revisiting the role of feedback.

  2007cited by this paper
• When 90% confidence intervals are 50% certain: on the credibility of credible intervals

  2005cited by this paper
• Obstetrician-gynecologists' decision making about the diagnosis of major depressive disorder and premenstrual dysphoric disorder

  2005cited by this paper
• Overconfidence in interval estimates.

  2004cited by this paper
• Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation.

  2004cited by this paper
• Improving calibration without training: the role of task information

  2003cited by this paper
• Heuristics and Biases: Assessing Uncertainty in Physical Constants

  2002cited by this paper
• Overconfidence in Judgmental Forecasting

  2001cited by this paper
• Do Investors Trade Too Much ?

  2000cited by this paper
• Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination

  1999cited by this paper
• Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions

  1999cited by this paper
• Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask.

  1999cited by this paper
• Underweighting Alternatives and Overconfidence

  1997cited by this paper
• Precision and Accuracy of Judgmental Estimation

  1997cited by this paper
• Outcome Feedback Effects on Under- and Overconfident Judgments (General Knowledge Tasks)

  1996cited by this paper
• Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments.

  1995cited by this paper
• How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats

  1995cited by this paper
• Chapter 13 Financial decision-making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective

  1995cited by this paper
• Graininess of judgment under uncertainty: An accuracy-informativeness trade-off

  1995cited by this paper
• The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments

  1994cited by this paper
• Financial Decision-Making in Markets and Firms: A Behavioral Perspective

  1994cited by this paper
• Critical IT (information technology) issues: the next ten years.

  1992cited by this paper
• Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

  1984cited by this paper
• The Psychology of Preferences

  1982cited by this paper
• Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980

  1982cited by this paper
• Judgment under uncertainty: A progress report on the training of probability assessors

  1982cited by this paper
• Judgment under uncertainty: Debiasing

  1982cited by this paper
• Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses.

  1981cited by this paper
• Physicians' use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting.

  1981cited by this paper
• Reasons for confidence.

  1980cited by this paper
• Training for calibration.

  1980cited by this paper
• Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47

  1979cited by this paper
• Eliciting subjective probability distributions on continuous variables

  1978cited by this paper
• Scoring Rules for Continuous Probability Distributions

  1976cited by this paper
• OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS.

  1965cited by this paper

• Broad effects of shallow understanding: Explaining an unrelated phenomenon exposes the illusion of explanatory depth

  2023cites this paper
• Practical application of disease risk analysis for reintroducing gray wolves (Canis lupus) to Isle Royale National Park, USA

  2022cites this paper
• Pola Overconfidence Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi SMK Nusaputera 2 Semarang

  2022cites this paper
• Testing the effectiveness of debiasing techniques to reduce overprecision in the elicitation of subjective continuous probability distributions

  2022cites this paper
• Conservation-Compatible Retrofit Solutions in Historic Buildings: An Integrated Approach

  2021cites this paper
• How to Influence the Results of MCDM?—Evidence of the Impact of Cognitive Biases

  2021cites this paper
• What is the Best Action for Children to "Wake Up" and "Put to Sleep" a Conversational Agent?: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach

  2020cites this paper
• Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Conversational Agents for Children with Autism

  2020cites this paper
• Debiasing Overconfidence among Indonesian Undergraduate Students in the Biology Classroom: An Intervention Study of the KAAR Model

  2020cites this paper
• Behavioural Analytics: Exploring judgments and choices in large data sets

  2019cites this paper
• Implications of Non-Tangible Assets and Macroeconomic Parameters on Long-term Stock Performance

  2019cites this paper
• Estimating the cost of regulating genome edited crops: expert judgment and overconfidence.

  2019cites this paper
• More-or-less elicitation (MOLE): reducing bias in range estimation and forecasting

  2018cites this paper
• Individual and Group Biases in Value and Uncertainty Judgments

  2018cites this paper
• IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING COGNITIVE BIASES IN SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY ELICITATION SURVEYS: MODEL BASED APPROACHES

  2016cites this paper