An examination of the influence of surprise on judges and jurors’ outcome effects

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2008

• Venue

  Critical Perspectives on Accounting

• Publication date

  2008-11-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/J.CPA.2007.06.005
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Judging Audit Quality in Light of Adverse Outcomes: Evidence of Outcome Bias and Reverse Outcome Bias

  2008cited by this paper
• Maintaining the Value and Viability of Independent Auditors as Gatekeepers Under SOX: An Auditing Master Proposal

  2005cited by this paper
• Hindsight Bias and Outcome-Consistent Thoughts when Observing and Making Service Provider Decisions.

  2005cited by this paper
• A Research Note on the Influence of Outcome Knowledge on Audit Partners' Judgments

  2002cited by this paper
• Debiasing the Outcome Effect: The Role of Instructions in an Audit Litigation Setting

  2002cited by this paper
• Outcome information and the evaluation of auditor performance: The role of evidence recall, interpretation and weighting

  2002cited by this paper
• A preliminary framework in examining the influence of outcome information on evaluations of auditor decisions

  2002cited by this paper
• Improving Jurors' Evaluations of Auditors in Negligence Cases*

  2001cited by this paper
• Modern federal jury instructions

  2001cited by this paper
• Perceptions of Auditor Responsibility: Views of the Judiciary and the Profession

  1998cited by this paper
• A Positive Psychological Theory of Judging in Hindsight

  1998cited by this paper
• Decomposing Hindsight Bias

  1998cited by this paper
• Causality as an influence on hindsight bias: An empirical examination of judges' evaluation of professional audit judgment

  1998cited by this paper
• Audit litigation research: Do the merits matter? An assessment and directions for future research

  1997cited by this paper
• Does a surprising outcome reinforce or reverse the hindsight bias

  1997cited by this paper
• Outcome effects: The impact of decision process and outcome controllability

  1997cited by this paper
• The Mitigation of Hindsight Bias in Judges' Evaluation of Auditor Decisions

  1997cited by this paper
• Motivating factors in lawsuits against independent auditors: Experimental evidence on the importance of causality

  1996cited by this paper
• Determinations of negligence and the hindsight bias

  1996cited by this paper
• “I Knew It All Along” Under All Conditions? or Possibly “I Could Not Have Expected It to Happen” Under Some Conditions?: Comments on Mark and Mellor (1994)

  1996cited by this paper
• Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment

  1995cited by this paper
• "We Don't Expect It Happened": On Mazursky and Ofir's (1990) Purported Reversal of the Hindsight Bias

  1994cited by this paper
• Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients

  1994cited by this paper
• The Effects of Hindsight Bias on Jurors' Evaluations of Auditor Decisions*

  1994cited by this paper
• Evaluation of auditor decisions: Hindsight bias effects and the expectation gap

  1993cited by this paper
• Inside the juror: Models of juror decision making

  1993cited by this paper
• Inside the juror: The influence of outcome information and attitudes on juror decision making in search and seizure cases

  1993cited by this paper
• The effect of outcome knowledge on auditors' judgmental evaluations

  1992cited by this paper
• Effect of self-relevance of an event on hindsight bias: The foreseeability of a layoff.

  1991cited by this paper
• Hindsight and Causality

  1991cited by this paper
• Trials Of Legal Disputes Involving Independent Auditors - Some Empirical-Evidence

  1991cited by this paper
• NEGLIGENCE VERSUS STRICT LIABILITY REGIMES IN AUDITING: AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

  1990cited by this paper
• Practical Implications of Psychological Research on Juror and Jury Decision Making

  1990cited by this paper
• “I could never have expected it to happen”: The reversal of the hindsight bias

  1990cited by this paper
• Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known.

  1990cited by this paper
• Second-guessing the jury: Stereotypic and hindsight biases in perceptions of court cases

  1990cited by this paper
• Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior

  1989cited by this paper
• How and when to correct for juror hindsight bias in mental health malpractice litigation: Some preliminary observations

  1989cited by this paper
• Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias

  1989cited by this paper
• Outcome feedback: hindsight and information

  1989cited by this paper
• Outcome bias in decision evaluation.

  1988cited by this paper
• Individual differences in reverse Hindsight bias: I never thought something like chernobyl would happen. Did I?

  1988cited by this paper
• Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment

  1988cited by this paper
• Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.

  1986cited by this paper
• Motivational interpretations of hindsight bias: An individual difference analysis

  1983cited by this paper
• Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses.

  1981cited by this paper
• Duties and Liabilities of Public Accountants

  1979cited by this paper
• On the Psychology of Experimental Surprises.

  1977cited by this paper
• Black's Law Dictionary

  1968cited by this paper
• Federal Jury Practice and Instructions

  1965cited by this paper

• The Role of Incentives, Emotional Connection, and Organizational Justice in Establishing an Effective Whistleblowing System: An Experimental Study

  2020cites this paper
• Hindsight bias and outcome bias in judging directors’ liability and the role of free will beliefs

  2020cites this paper
• Key audit matter and auditor liability: evidence from auditor evaluators in Thailand

  2020cites this paper
• The Role of Key Audit Matters in Assessing Auditor Liability: Evidence from Auditor and Non-auditor Evaluators

  2020cites this paper
• QUESTIONING THE UNCRITICAL APPLICATION OF TRANSLATION AND BACK-TRANSLATION METHODOLOGY IN ACCOUNTING: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

  2015cites this paper
• Judgments in causal chains: The impact of positive and negative motives and outcomes on lay attributions

  2014cites this paper
• Expectation gap on auditor liability to third parties in China

  2013cites this paper
• The Outcome Effect - A Review and Implications for Future Research

  2013cites this paper
• Auditor liability: A comparison of judge and juror verdicts

  2012cites this paper
• The Influence of Information Presentation Order and Evaluation Time Horizon on the Outcome Effect

  2012cites this paper
• A Review of Bias Research in Auditing: Opportunities for Integrating Experimental Psychology and Experimental Economics

  2009cites this paper