The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty

Communication by scientists with policy makers and attentive publics raises ethical issues. Scientists need to decide how to communicate knowledge effectively in a way that nonscientists can understand and use, while remaining honest scientists and presenting estimates of the uncertainty of their inferences. They need to understand their own ethical choices in using scientific information to communicate to audiences. These issues were salient in the Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change with respect to possible sea level rise from disintegration of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets. Due to uncertainty, the reported values of projected sea level rise were incomplete, potentially leading some relevant audiences to underestimate future risk. Such judgments should be made in a principled rather than an ad hoc manner. Five principles for scientific communication under such conditions are important: honesty, precision, audience relevance, process transparency, and specification of uncertainty about conclusions. Some of these principles are of intrinsic importance while others are merely instrumental and subject to trade-offs among them. Scientists engaged in assessments under uncertainty should understand these principles and which trade-offs are acceptable.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Politics, Philosophy & Economics

• Publication date

  2014-06-27

• Fields of study

  Political Science, Philosophy, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/1470594X14538570
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The signal and the noise

  2016cited by this paper
• Finding your place on the science – advocacy continuum: an editorial essay

  2014cited by this paper
• WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAIN: SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ETHICS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGMENT

  2013cited by this paper
• Summary for policymakers

  2013cited by this paper
• The Morality of Spin: Virtue and Vice in Political Rhetoric and the Christian Right

  2013cited by this paper
• Deliberative Systems: Rational deliberation among experts and citizens

  2012cited by this paper
• Communicating probabilistic information from climate model ensembles—lessons from numerical weather prediction

  2012cited by this paper
• Do probabilistic expert elicitations capture scientists’ uncertainty about climate change?

  2012cited by this paper
• Climate change and moral judgement

  2012cited by this paper
• Communicating science: Professional, popular, literary

  2012cited by this paper
• Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony1

  2011cited by this paper
• Science in a Democratic Society

  2011cited by this paper
• Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions

  2010cited by this paper
• Dynamics of uncertainty in geological interpretation

  2010cited by this paper
• Climate change 2007: the physical science basis

  2010cited by this paper
• Fixing the communications failure

  2010cited by this paper
• Keep it complex

  2010cited by this paper
• Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save Earth's Climate

  2009influential reference
• A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science: Using Practice to Inform Theory

  2009cited by this paper
• Practical Intelligence and the Virtues

  2009cited by this paper
• :The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics

  2008cited by this paper
• Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  2007cited by this paper
• The Limits of Consensus

  2007cited by this paper
• The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics

  2007cited by this paper
• Nature's “Crisis Disciplines”: Does Environmental Communication Have an Ethical Duty?

  2007cited by this paper
• Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics

  2007influential reference
• Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency

  2007cited by this paper
• Countering the Loading-Dock Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making

  2006cited by this paper
• Transparency: the Key to Better Governance?

  2006cited by this paper
• Varieties of transparency

  2006cited by this paper
• Transparency and the Ethics of Communication

  2006cited by this paper
• Transparency as an instrumental value

  2006cited by this paper
• Book Review: Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy

  2005cited by this paper
• Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View

  2003cited by this paper
• Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics: Bibliography

  2002cited by this paper
• Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics

  2002cited by this paper
• Probability elicitation for belief networks: issues to consider

  2001cited by this paper
• Virtue Ethics and Professional Roles

  2001cited by this paper
• Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge.

  1998cited by this paper
• Practical Reason and Incompletely Theorized Agreements

  1998cited by this paper
• Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms

  1988cited by this paper
• Policy Indicators: Links between Social Science and Public Debate.

  1986cited by this paper
• The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

  1981cited by this paper

• The Rule of Love

  2026cites this paper
• Metaphors and values in the communication of climate tipping points

  2026cites this paper
• Democratic Falsehoods

  2026cites this paper
• Educational Falsehoods

  2025cites this paper
• Unpacking the Risk of Misinformation: A Communication‐Based Critique

  2025cites this paper
• Communicating natural hazards science advice: Understanding scientists’, decision-makers’, and the public’s perceptions of the scientific process.

  2025cites this paper
• Staying hooked: effective science engagement and communication in recreational fisheries

  2025cites this paper
• The effect of uncertainty communication on public trust depends on belief–evidence consistency

  2025cites this paper
• A Meta-Analysis Synthesizing the Effects of Three Uncertainty Types in Science Communication

  2025cites this paper
• A temperature check on climate communication: where are we?

  2025cites this paper
• Effective Strategies for Environmental Health Risk Communication

  2025cites this paper
• The principle of stewardship truthful communication for the restoration of trust in public health officials

  2025cites this paper
• Confidence in Covid-19 models

  2024cites this paper
• Editorial: The shadowlands of (geo)science communication in academia – definitions, problems, and possible solutions

  2024cites this paper
• Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension

  2024cites this paper
• Communication under Uncertainty and the Role of Founders’ Information Advantage: Evidence from SPAC IPOs

  2024cites this paper
• Heading in Football: insights from stakeholders in amateur football

  2023cites this paper
• Assessing Large Language Models on Climate Information

  2023cites this paper
• Where does scientific uncertainty come from, and from whom? Mapping perspectives of natural hazards science advice

  2023cites this paper
• Trustworthy Science Advice: The Case of Policy Recommendations

  2023cites this paper
• Motivating COVID-19 Vaccination through Persuasive Communication: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

  2023cites this paper
• Quran, name, and scientific communication

  2022cites this paper
• Scientists in Power in Science and Techno‑Utopias (“Flight of the Earth” and “The Transhumanist Wager”)

  2022cites this paper
• “I need to have a plan in place”: Accessing medications and health treatments during a disaster for people with long-term health conditions

  2022cites this paper
• Scientific Testimony

  2022cites this paper
• The IPCC and the challenge of ex post policy evaluation

  2022cites this paper
• An Ethical Framework for Presenting Scientific Results to Policy-Makers

  2022cites this paper
• NSF AI Institute for Research on Trustworthy AI in Weather, Climate, and Coastal Oceanography (AI2ES)

  2022cites this paper
• Categorizing Professionals’ Perspectives on Environmental Communication with Implications for Graduate Education

  2021cites this paper
• The Limits of Transparency: Expert Knowledge and Meaningful Accountability in Central Banking

  2021cites this paper
• Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms

  2021cites this paper
• Climate Change, Uncertainty and Policy

  2021cites this paper
• The Water Science Communication Problem: Water Knowledge and the Acceptance or Rejection of Water Science

  2021cites this paper
• Why we need to focus on developing ethical, responsible, and trustworthy artificial intelligence approaches for environmental science

  2021cites this paper
• A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship

  2020cites this paper
• Accurate science requires that we base our work on accurate publications.

  2020cites this paper
• Expertise and communicating about infectious disease: a case study of uncertainty and rejection of local knowledge in discourse of experts and decision makers

  2020cites this paper
• Forecasting for a Fractured Land: A Case Study of the Communication and Use of Aftershock Forecasts from the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake in Aotearoa New Zealand

  2020cites this paper
• A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science

  2020cites this paper
• The Evolving Field of Risk Communication

  2020cites this paper
• Science, Values, and Science Communication: Competencies for Pushing Beyond the Deficit Model

  2019cites this paper
• Communicating model uncertainty for natural hazards: A qualitative systematic thematic review

  2019influential citation
• The Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics

  2019cites this paper
• What Are the Guiding Ethical Principles of Science Communication?

  2019cites this paper
• Scientists as experts: A distinct role?

  2018cites this paper
• Epistemic trust and the ethics of science communication: against transparency, openness, sincerity and honesty

  2018cites this paper
• What do people know about climate change ― and how confident are they? On measurements and analyses of science related knowledge

  2018cites this paper
• Transparency in risk regulation : the case of the European Medicines Agency

  2017cites this paper
• Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: making experts accountable

  2017cites this paper
• Attributing extreme weather events in Africa to climate change : science, policy and practice

  2017cites this paper
• Using Democratic Values in Science: An Objection and (Partial) Response

  2017cites this paper
• Evidence-based uncertainty analysis: What should we now do in Europe? A view point

  2017cites this paper
• Decision-Making: Preventing Miscommunication and Creating Shared Meaning Between Stakeholders

  2017cites this paper
• Servitizing climate science—Institutional analysis of climate services discourse and its implications

  2017cites this paper
• THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

  2017cites this paper
• Environmental data visualisation for non-scientific contexts: Literature review and design framework

  2016cites this paper
• Aristotle on the Ethics of Communicating Climate Change

  2016cites this paper
• Political Theory on Climate Change

  2016cites this paper
• Medicines transparency at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the new information age: the perspectives of patients

  2016cites this paper
• Green Allies: Speculative Realism, Evangelical Christianity, and Political Pluralism

  2016cites this paper
• Climatology in support of climate risk management

  2015cites this paper
• Ensuring climate information guides long-term development

  2015cites this paper
• Promoting the Use of Climate Information to Achieve Long-Term Development Objectives In Sub-Saharan Africa

  2015cites this paper
• Advancing the interdisciplinary dialogue on climate justice

  2015influential citation
• WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAIN: SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ETHICS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGMENT

  2013cites this paper
• Precise Semantics for Uncertainty Modeling (PSUM)

  year unknowncites this paper
• The transformation of religious communication Knowledge among Buddhist religious instructors: A case study on the implementation of Buddhist communication science

  year unknowncites this paper