Mobile police community office: a vehicle for reducing crime, crime harm and enhancing police legitimacy?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Journal of Experimental Criminology

• Publication date

  2017-08-22

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Law, Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/S11292-017-9302-6
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Assessing community consequences of implementing hot spots policing in residential areas: findings from a randomized field trial

  2017cited by this paper
• “Soft” policing at hot spots—do police community support officers work? A randomized controlled trial

  2016cited by this paper
• The Cambridge Crime Harm Index: Measuring Total Harm from Crime Based on Sentencing Guidelines

  2016cited by this paper
• The Queensland Mobile Community Office Project: putting wheels in motion for procedurally just community policing

  2016cited by this paper
• Crime Places in Crime Theory

  2015cited by this paper
• Towards an Index for Harm-Focused Policing

  2015cited by this paper
• Targeting Escalation in Reported Domestic Abuse

  2015cited by this paper
• How Much Time Should the Police Spend at Crime Hot Spots? Answers from a Police Agency Directed Randomized Field Trial in Sacramento, California

  2014cited by this paper
• The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  2014cited by this paper
• Hot Spots Policing

  2014cited by this paper
• Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence

  2013cited by this paper
• Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice

  2013cited by this paper
• Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET)

  2012cited by this paper
• The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: an experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy

  2011cited by this paper
• Constructing Hot Spots Policing: Unexamined Consequences for Disadvantaged Populations and for Police Legitimacy:

  2011cited by this paper
• Legitimacy, Fear and Collective Efficacy in Crime Hot Spots: Assessing the Impacts of Broken Windows Policing Strategies on Citizen Attitudes

  2010cited by this paper
• Policing Problem Places: Crime Hot Spots and Effective Prevention

  2010cited by this paper
• TARGETED ENFORCEMENT AND ADVERSE SYSTEM SIDE EFFECTS: THE GENERATION OF FUGITIVES IN PHILADELPHIA*

  2008cited by this paper
• POLICING CRIME AND DISORDER HOT SPOTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL*

  2008cited by this paper
• Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime

  2007cited by this paper
• Public Satisfaction With Police: Using Procedural Justice to Improve Police Legitimacy

  2007cited by this paper
• DOES CRIME JUST MOVE AROUND THE CORNER? A CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT AND DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS*

  2006cited by this paper
• Enhancing Police Legitimacy

  2004cited by this paper
• What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear?

  2004cited by this paper
• The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing

  2003cited by this paper
• Trust in the Law

  2002cited by this paper
• Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment

  1995cited by this paper
• General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial

  1995cited by this paper
• What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures.

  1988cited by this paper

• The adoption of a crime harm index: A scoping literature review

  2021influential citation
• The empirical study of procedural justice policing in Australia

  2020cites this paper
• Community-Oriented Policing, Perceptions of Police Performance and Trust in Local Government

  year unknowncites this paper