ABSTRACT Several studies have been using quantified consensus within climate science as an argument to foster climate policy. Recent efforts to communicate such scientific consensus attained a high public profile but it is doubtful if they can be regarded successful. We argue that repeated efforts to shore up the scientific consensus on minimalist claims such as “humans cause global warming” are distractions from more urgent matters of knowledge, values, policy framing and public engagement. Such efforts to force policy progress through communicating scientific consensus misunderstand the relationship between scientific knowledge, publics and policymakers. More important is to focus on genuinely controversial issues within climate policy debates where expertise might play a facilitating role. Mobilizing expertise in policy debates calls for judgment, context and attention to diversity, rather than deferring to formal quantifications of narrowly scientific claims.
Beyond Counting Climate Consensus
W. Pearce,R. Grundmann,M. Hulme,S. Raman,Eleanor Hadley Kershaw,Judith Tsouvalis
Published 2017 in Environmental Communication
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2017
- Venue
Environmental Communication
- Publication date
2017-07-23
- Fields of study
Political Science, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-67 of 67 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-96 of 96 citing papers · Page 1 of 1