If only I wasn't so impulsive: Counterfactual thinking and delay-discounting

Abstract Previous research confirms that people continue to engage in impulsive behavior despite negative consequences. Little is known about what differentiates individuals who learn from past mistakes and those who do not. The theory of functional counterfactual thinking proposes that generating counterfactual (‘if only’) thoughts after a failure or negative event can facilitate learning from past mistakes. We examined the use of counterfactual thinking, based on an individual's levels of impulsivity. Confirming hypotheses, results suggest that highly impulsive individuals are less likely to engage in functional counterfactual thinking (i.e., upward-additive counterfactuals). Interestingly, these results held only for individuals who were high on behavioral, but not self-reported impulsivity. Implications for the role of counterfactual thinking in impulsive individuals are discussed.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Personality and Individual Differences

• Publication date

  2018-12-01

• Fields of study

  Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/J.PAID.2018.07.023
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The functional theory of counterfactual thinking : New evidence, new challenges, new insights

  2017cited by this paper
• Psychopathic individuals exhibit but do not avoid regret during counterfactual decision making

  2016cited by this paper
• Free Will, Counterfactual Reflection, and the Meaningfulness of Life Events

  2015cited by this paper
• Fantasy proneness and counterfactual thinking

  2013cited by this paper
• Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: emerging evidence.

  2012cited by this paper
• When goal pursuit fails: The functions of counterfactual thought in intention formation.

  2011cited by this paper
• “If Only I Had Done Better”: Perfectionism and the Functionality of Counterfactual Thinking

  2010cited by this paper
• The aftermath of rash action: sleep-interfering counterfactual thoughts and emotions.

  2009cited by this paper
• Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review

  2009cited by this paper
• Dimensions of impulsive behavior in adolescents: laboratory behavioral assessments.

  2008cited by this paper
• The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking

  2008cited by this paper
• Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers.

  2007cited by this paper
• Delay discounting in college cigarette chippers

  2006cited by this paper
• Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures

  2006cited by this paper
• Laboratory behavioral measures of impulsivity

  2005cited by this paper
• If Only I Hadn't Smoked: The Impact of Counterfactual Thinking on a Smoking-Related Behavior.

  2003cited by this paper
• Relationships Among Laboratory and Psychometric Measures of Impulsivity: Implications in Substance Abuse and Dependence

  2003cited by this paper
• Area under the curve as a measure of discounting.

  2001cited by this paper
• Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol.

  1999cited by this paper
• Counterfactual thinking.

  1997cited by this paper
• Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale.

  1995cited by this paper
• The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking

  1994cited by this paper
• The Structure of Counterfactual Thought

  1993cited by this paper
• Mental Simulation of Causality

  1989cited by this paper
• Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives

  1986cited by this paper

• Maximizers and Satisficers: Can’t choose and Can’t reject

  2021cites this paper
• Pathways to Recovery among Homeless People with Mental Illness: Is Impulsiveness Getting in the Way?

  2019cites this paper