The right to argue: teaching and assessing everyday argumentation skills

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2019

• Venue

  Journal of Further and Higher Education

• Publication date

  2019-09-14

• Fields of study

  Linguistics, Education, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/0309877X.2018.1450967
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Validation

  2019cited by this paper
• The Argumentative Turn Revisited

  2019cited by this paper
• Reasoning as a lie detection device (Commentary on Mercier and Sperber:’Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory’)

  2019cited by this paper
• Metacognitive monitoring

  2016cited by this paper
• Measurement Advances and Challenges in Competency Assessment in Higher Education

  2016cited by this paper
• Competency Research in Higher Education: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges and Perspectives for Future Interdisciplinary Research

  2015cited by this paper
• A Disciplined Approach to Critical Thinking

  2015cited by this paper
• Critical Thinking and/or Argumentation in Higher Education

  2015cited by this paper
• Teaching critical thinking

  2015cited by this paper
• Unraveling the effects of critical thinking instructions, practice, and self-explanation on students’ reasoning performance

  2015cited by this paper
• Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically

  2015cited by this paper
• Proposition testing: a strategy to develop critical thinking for essay writing

  2015cited by this paper
• Teaching Critical Thinking: An Operational Framework

  2015cited by this paper
• Deliberative Cultures

  2014cited by this paper
• Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs

  2013cited by this paper
• The Common Core State Standards and Evidence-Based Educational Practices: The Case of Writing

  2013cited by this paper
• The Added Value of Argumentation

  2013cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies

  2013cited by this paper
• Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives

  2013cited by this paper
• Do instructional interventions influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis

  2013cited by this paper
• The impact of high stakes testing: the Australian story

  2012cited by this paper
• Which test? Whose scores? Comparing standardized critical thinking tests

  2011cited by this paper
• A Workbook for Arguments: A Complete Course in Critical Thinking

  2011cited by this paper
• Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses

  2011cited by this paper
• Crosswalk Analysis of Deeper Learning Skills to Common Core State Standards.

  2011cited by this paper
• Teaching and Learning Argumentative Reading and Writing: A Review of Research

  2011cited by this paper
• Teaching Argument for Critical Thinking and Writing: An Introduction.

  2010cited by this paper
• Principles and Practices of Test Score Equating

  2010cited by this paper
• Strategies to read and learn: overcoming learning by consumption

  2010cited by this paper
• Developing generic skills through university study: a study of arts, science and engineering in Australia

  2010cited by this paper
• Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking

  2010influential reference
• Improving Students' Evaluation of Informal Arguments

  2009cited by this paper
• Assessment of Competencies in Educational Contexts

  2008cited by this paper
• Making Sense of “Informal Logic”

  2008cited by this paper
• Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis

  2008cited by this paper
• Reaching agreement: The structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses’ informal argument

  2008cited by this paper
• Teaching and Learning Argumentation

  2007cited by this paper
• Implications of Evidence‐Centered Design for Educational Testing

  2007cited by this paper
• Redefining College Readiness.

  2007cited by this paper
• The Collegiate Learning Assessment

  2007cited by this paper
• Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society's Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy

  2006cited by this paper
• Measuring Instructional Responses to Standards-Based Accountability

  2006cited by this paper
• Teaching and Assessing Deductive Reasoning Skills

  2006influential reference
• The state of critical thinking today

  2005cited by this paper
• Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons From Cognitive Science

  2005cited by this paper
• The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations

  2005cited by this paper
• There ought to be a law.

  2005cited by this paper
• Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic

  2004cited by this paper
• The Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction in Critical Thinking

  2004cited by this paper
• Measurement Theory in Action: Case Studies and Exercises

  2004cited by this paper
• Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students

  2004cited by this paper
• Cultivating expertise in informal reasoning.

  2004cited by this paper
• Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking

  2004cited by this paper
• Critical Thinking as a Citizenship Competence: Teaching Strategies.

  2004cited by this paper
• DISFLUENCIES IN COMPREHENDING ARGUMENTATIVE TEXTS

  2004cited by this paper
• Testing and Student Engagement with Literature in Urban Classrooms: A Multi-layered Perspective

  2003cited by this paper
• Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, by William R. Shadish, Thomas D. Cook, and Donald T. Campbell. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001, 623 pp., $65.56.

  2003cited by this paper
• Focus Article: On the Structure of Educational Assessments

  2003cited by this paper
• Critical thinking in nursing education: literature review.

  2002cited by this paper
• Assessing University Students' General and Specific Critical Thinking

  2002cited by this paper
• Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm.

  2002influential reference
• Critical thinking in nursing education: literature review.

  2002cited by this paper
• Teaching and Assessing Critical Thinking Abilities as Outcomes in an Informal Logic Course

  2001cited by this paper
• Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference

  2001cited by this paper
• Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide

  2001influential reference
• Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms

  2000cited by this paper
• Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

  1999influential reference
• Evaluating the outcomes of intensive critical thinking instruction for social work students

  1999cited by this paper
• Higher Order Thinking Skills • Definition • Teaching Strategies • Assessment

  1998cited by this paper
• Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring.

  1998cited by this paper
• Public Goods, Private Goods: The American Struggle Over Educational Goals

  1997cited by this paper
• Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Brief Edition of Thought & Knowledge

  1997cited by this paper
• Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels

  1996cited by this paper
• A schema-based theory of transfer.

  1996cited by this paper
• The Cognitive Processes in Informal Reasoning

  1996influential reference
• Why Should Educators Care about Argumentation

  1995cited by this paper
• Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45.

  1994cited by this paper
• Democracy and the Teaching of Argument

  1994cited by this paper
• Strategies for teaching.

  1994cited by this paper
• Reason and Argument

  1993cited by this paper
• Critical thinking assessment

  1993cited by this paper
• Critical Thinking: An Introduction to the Basic Skills

  1992influential reference
• Immediate and delayed transfer of training effects in statistical reasoning.

  1991cited by this paper
• Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception

  1991cited by this paper
• Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation.

  1991cited by this paper
• Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning.

  1989cited by this paper
• The rationality of science, critical thinking, and science education

  1989cited by this paper
• A Rulebook for Arguments

  1987cited by this paper
• The Goal of Critical Thinking: from Educational Ideal to Educational Reality.

  1986cited by this paper
• Informal Reasoning and Subject Matter Knowledge in the Solving of Economics Problems By Naive and Novice Individuals

  1986cited by this paper
• A practical study of argument

  1985cited by this paper
• Postprimary Education Has Little Impact on Informal Reasoning.

  1985cited by this paper
• Critical Thinking and Education

  1982cited by this paper
• The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

  1977influential reference
• Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence".

  1973influential reference
• A concise introduction to logic

  1972cited by this paper
• The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction.

  1970cited by this paper
• Reasoning about a Rule

  1968cited by this paper
• The Government Printing Office

  1968cited by this paper
• Construct validity in psychological tests.

  1955cited by this paper

• Promoting Argumentation Skills Among University Students: A Scoping Review

  2025cites this paper
• Argument refutation training as explanation for the mechanism of resistance in inoculation theory

  2025cites this paper
• Argumentation and Knowledge Construction in Higher Education: A Vygotskian Perspective

  2024cites this paper
• Can Video Lectures on Enthymemes Improve Adult Learner’s Critical Thinking and Clickbait Detection Skills?

  2024cites this paper
• Unraveling University EFL Teachers’ Feedback Beliefs in Teaching English Argumentative Writing

  2024cites this paper
• Think How to Think: Studying the Relationship between Critical Thinking Skills and Academic Achievement of Learners at Higher Education

  2023cites this paper
• The impact of integrated technology on students' logical thought in mathematics: A case study of Kazakhstan

  2023cites this paper
• International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)

  2023cites this paper
• Online Verbal Argumentative Interaction (OVAI) in an Online Science Class During the Covid-19 Pandemic

  2022cites this paper
• Students’ use of formalisations for improved logical reasoning

  2022cites this paper
• THE EFFECTS OF INDEXING PROMPTS ON PROBLEM-SOLVING IN CASE LIBRARY LEARNING

  2020cites this paper
• Comprensión y producción de argumentación escrita en estudiantes de educación primaria

  2020cites this paper
• Inglés con propósitos específicos: escenario para el desarrollo de la competencia argumentativa

  2020cites this paper