Public Opinion and Political Vulnerability: Why Has the National Endowment for the Arts Been Such an Attractive Target?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1999

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Political Science

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Culture and the Arts

  1999cited by this paper
• Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980-1993

  1998cited by this paper
• Bringing the Public Back In: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy?

  1998cited by this paper
• Individuals, Institutions, and Public Preferences over Public Finance

  1998cited by this paper
• Public Sentiments Towards the Arts: A Critical Reanalysis of 13 Opinion Surveys

  1997cited by this paper
• Congress and the national endowment for the arts: Institutional patterns and arts funding, 1965–1994

  1997cited by this paper
• Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment from 1980 to 1994

  1997cited by this paper
• Resources for Studying Public Participation in the Arts: Inventory and Review of Available Survey Data on North Americans' Participation in and Attitudes Towards the Arts

  1997cited by this paper
• Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?

  1996cited by this paper
• In What Spirit Do Americans Cultivate the Arts? A Review of Survey Questions on the Arts

  1996cited by this paper
• National Assembly of Local Arts Agencies

  1994cited by this paper
• The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences

  1992cited by this paper
• The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Contents

  1992cited by this paper
• Public money and the muse : essays on government funding for the arts

  1991cited by this paper
• The logic of congressional action

  1990cited by this paper
• THE POLLS—A REVIEWSURVEY ORGANIZATION DIFFERENCES IN ESTIMATING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE ARTS

  1989cited by this paper
• Our Government and the Arts: A Perspective from the Inside

  1988cited by this paper
• Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement

  1988cited by this paper
• Effects of Public Opinion on Policy

  1983cited by this paper
• NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER OF THE ARTS

  1974cited by this paper

• “Culture out!” Far right against cultural policy: the case of the Milei government in Argentina and the cultural war against state cultural spending

  2025cites this paper
• The Land of (Almost) No Central Government Arts Spending? Cultural Policy, Protestant Denominations, and the Cultural Policy Singularity of Unites States of America

  2023influential citation
• Attitudes towards the funding of cultural policy in Spain: an examination of the ideological and political factors

  2022cites this paper
• Congress and the Political Economy of the National Endowment for the Arts

  2021cites this paper
• Transformation in three American orchestras: an analysis of labor, agency, and change

  2017cites this paper
• Noise, Sound and Objecthood: The Politics of Representation in the Musical Avant-Garde

  2016cites this paper
• For More Information

  2016cites this paper
• Adding Up the Arts: The Great Recession and the Public-Private Debate in the Funding of America's Art and Art Museums

  2016cites this paper
• Efficiency in the Provision of Public Municipal Cultural Facilities

  2014cites this paper
• Municipal elections and cultural expenditure

  2013cites this paper
• Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding

  2013cites this paper
• Seçilmiş OECD ülkelerinde kültürel kamu harcamalarının sosyo-ekonomik belirleyenleri üzerine bir analiz

  2013cites this paper
• Who benefits from public funding of the performing arts? Comparing the art provision and the hegemony–distinction approaches

  2012cites this paper
• Municipal elections and cultural expenditure

  2012cites this paper
• House Poor: How a Drive for Stability Led to a Strategic Rethinking of Cultural Institutions’ Relationship to Their Space

  2012cites this paper
• A Seismic Shift in U.S. Federal Arts Policy: A Tale of Organizational Challenge and Controversy in the 1990s

  2009cites this paper
• Ethnic boundaries in American, Dutch, and German national literary policies, 1965–2005

  2009cites this paper
• The Double-Edged Sword of Public-Resource Dependence: The Impact of Public Resources on Autonomy and Legitimacy in Korean Cultural Nonprofit Organizations

  2007cites this paper
• Beyond Women, Children, and Families: Gender, Representation, and Public Funding for the Arts

  2007cites this paper
• Supporting the need: a comparative investigation of public and private arts endowments supporting state arts agencies

  2007cites this paper
• Understanding State Government Appropriations for the Arts: 1976-1999

  2006influential citation
• The arts and state governments

  2006cites this paper
• Public Spending on the Arts as Morality Policy: The Structure of Public Attitudes

  2006cites this paper
• Limited Electronic Distribution Rights

  2005cites this paper
• SEXUAL POLITICS IN THE DEFENSE OF ART: CULTURE WARS, MAPPLETHORPE, AND THE ROAD FROM FORMALISM TO IDENTITY POLITICS

  2004cites this paper
• State Arts Agencies 1965-2003: Whose Interests to Serve

  2004cites this paper
• Classification into the literary Mainstream? Ethnic Boundaries in the Literary Fields of the United States, the Netherlands and Germany, 1955-2005

  2004cites this paper
• Whose Interests to Serve

  2003cites this paper
• Transaction cost politics and the National Endowment for the Arts

  2003cites this paper
• Political oversight of arts councils: A comparison of Canada and the United States

  2002cites this paper
• Culture, Conflict and Community: Rituals of Protest or Flairs of Competition

  2002cites this paper
• Resources for studying public participation in and attitudes towards the arts

  2000cites this paper