Ethics of Dissent: A Plea for Restraint in the Scientific Debate About the Safety of GM Crops

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

• Publication date

  2015-09-14

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Philosophy, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/S10806-015-9564-9
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• No scientific consensus on GMO safety

  2015cited by this paper
• Naturally toxic: natural substances used in personal care products

  2015cited by this paper
• Governance Capabilities for Dealing Wisely With Wicked Problems

  2015cited by this paper
• Governance strategies for responding to alarming studies on the safety of GM crops

  2015cited by this paper
• Institutionalizing Ethical Debates in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: A Comparison of Europe, India and China

  2015cited by this paper
• An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research

  2014cited by this paper
• Contested science : Public controversies about science and policy

  2014cited by this paper
• Who's afraid of peer review?

  2013cited by this paper
• Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study claiming that Roundup™ Ready corn or the herbicide Roundup™ cause cancer in rats

  2013cited by this paper
• Answers to critics: Why there is a long term toxicity due to a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize and to a Roundup herbicide.

  2013cited by this paper
• A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet.

  2013cited by this paper
• What a Hoax: Why people believe in conspiracy theories

  2013cited by this paper
• The Biotechnology Debate

  2012cited by this paper
• The Biotechnology Debate: Democracy in the Face of Intractable Disagreement

  2012cited by this paper
• Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize.

  2012cited by this paper
• Risk and soft impacts

  2011cited by this paper
• Biotechnology and social learning: An empirical analysis of the Dutch Animal Biotechnology Act

  2009cited by this paper
• Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures*

  2009cited by this paper
• Meetings that changed the world: Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured

  2008cited by this paper
• Toxins in transgenic crop byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems

  2007cited by this paper
• Quality and value: The true purpose of peer review

  2006cited by this paper
• How science makes environmental controversies worse

  2004cited by this paper
• Science and public policy: what's proof got to do with it?

  2004cited by this paper
• Publics and counterpublics (abbreviated version)

  2002cited by this paper
• Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths

  2001cited by this paper
• Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine.

  1999cited by this paper
• Conflicts of Interest and commitment in academic science in the United States

  1996cited by this paper
• Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis

  1995cited by this paper
• Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

  1973cited by this paper

• Ethical Decision-Making on Genetically Modified Foods in China from a Dynamic Balance Perspective

  2025cites this paper
• Bioethical issues on farmers’ rights relating to genetically modified crops

  2023cites this paper
• The Deadlock in European Decision-Making on GMOs as a Wicked Problem by Design: A Need for Repoliticization

  2022cites this paper
• Intended and unintended consequences of genetically modified crops – myth, fact and/or manageable outcomes?

  2022cites this paper
• Agricultural biotechnology—opportunities and strengths

  2022cites this paper
• GMO Policies and Practices: A Global Overview with Special Focus on Turkey

  2021cites this paper
• GMO Regulation in Crisis – The Experimental Potential of Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 on Covid-19 in Addressing Both a Crisis and a ­Pandemic

  2021cites this paper
• Knowledge and the News: An Investigation of the Relation Between News Use, News Avoidance, and the Presence of (Mis)beliefs

  2021cites this paper
• Opposition to Genetic Modification in Agriculture: Green Movements Motivations

  2020cites this paper
• Organizations, Risk Translation, and the Ecology of Risks: The Discursive Construction of a Novel Risk

  2020cites this paper
• A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands

  2020cites this paper
• UNDERLYING CONSTRUCTS OF FARMERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND ADOPTION DECISION TOWARDS GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS AMONG SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN NORTHERN GHANA

  2019cites this paper
• Agriculture’s Moral Dilemmas and the Need for Agroecology

  2018influential citation
• Socio-economic Considerations in Regulatory Decision- making on Genetically Modified Crops

  2018cites this paper
• Consumer attitudes toward genetically modified food in the United States: Are Millennials different?

  2018cites this paper
• Genetically Engineered Oil Seed Crops and Novel Terrestrial Nutrients: Ethical Considerations

  2018cites this paper
• Is it only the regulatory status? Broadening the debate on cisgenic plants

  2017cites this paper
• The environmental ethics of the corporatization of agriculture and crop genetic engineering : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Management at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

  2017cites this paper
• Science Policy and Concomitant Research in Synthetic Biology—Some Critical Thoughts

  2016cites this paper
• Science Policy and Concomitant Research in Synthetic Biology—Some Critical Thoughts

  2016cites this paper
• Governance strategies for responding to alarming studies on the safety of GM crops

  2015cites this paper