Capital Theory Up to Date

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1970

• Venue

  Canadian Journal of Economics

• Publication date

  1970-05-01

• Fields of study

  Economics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-590550-3.50014-8
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• No references are available for this paper.

• THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION: A CONSIDERATION OF SOME EXISTENTIAL PROBLEMS

  2025cites this paper
• Solow's attempt to revive the concept of ‘social rate of return’ and Pasinetti's critique

  2024cites this paper
• On the Notion of ‘Factor of Production’ in Economic Theory

  2024cites this paper
• Rethinking productivity: the crucial role of demand

  2023cites this paper
• Institutional Aspects of Capital in Joan Robinson’s ’Rules of the Game’: Rentier versus Entrepreneurs in Managerial Capitalism

  2023cites this paper
• Joan Robinson: early endogenous growth theorist

  2023cites this paper
• A new empirical contribution to an old theoretical puzzle: what input–output matrix properties tells us about equilibrium prices and quantities

  2022cites this paper
• Marx, Sraffa and Classical Price Theory

  2022cites this paper
• Measurement of Natural Capital in academic journals

  2021cites this paper
• Capital in the history of economic thought: charting the ontological underworld

  2020cites this paper
• The Illusions of Calculating Total Factor Productivity and Testing Growth Models: From Cobb-Douglas to Solow and to Romer

  2019cites this paper
• Reading Capital in the Twenty-First Century: Thomas Piketty and political economy

  2019cites this paper
• The illusions of calculating total factor productivity and testing growth models: from Cobb-Douglas to Solow and Romer

  2019cites this paper
• TRINITY COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER 17-05 Capital as a Social Process: A Marxian Perspective.

  2017cites this paper
• Logical Gaps: Path A—Theory to the Real World

  2015cites this paper
• The CasP Project: Past, Present, Future

  2015cites this paper
• Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy

  2015cites this paper
• Paradigms and Framing in Applied Economics: Methodological Issues

  2015cites this paper
• The existence of well-behaved aggregate production functions in a classical model with heterogeneous capital and a finite technology

  2014cites this paper
• L'économie dans l'impasse climatique

  2014cites this paper
• Paper for the International Initiative for Promoting Political Economy Fifth Annual Conference in Political Economy “The Crisis: Scholarship, Policies, Conflicts and Alternatives” September 16-18, 2014, Naples, Italy Are paradigms the answer?

  2014cites this paper
• Aggregate Production Functions and the Accounting Identity Critique: Criticisms and Misunderstandings with Special Reference to Temple

  2014cites this paper
• Rethinking Economics: From Analogies to the Real World

  2014cites this paper
• Ontological Commitments of Ethics and Economics

  2013cites this paper
• Towards a revision of the theory of capital

  2013cites this paper
• HOW SOUND ARE THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION

  2013cites this paper
• No Ethical Issues in Economics

  2012cites this paper
• Conferences, 2012 Economics and Society. The Ethical Dimension n. CI, Feb-March 2012

  2012cites this paper
• An empirical estimation of total factor productivity growth for Australia from 1960 to 2010

  2012cites this paper
• On the Present State of the Capital Controversy

  2012cites this paper
• An economic perspective on the law : Is there "legal failure"? : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Economics at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

  2011cites this paper
• C.E. Ferguson and the Neoclassical Theory of Capital: A Matter of Faith

  2011cites this paper
• C.E. FERGUSON’S LOST REPLY TO JOAN ROBINSON ON THE THEORY OF CAPITAL

  2011cites this paper
• Economic Theory: Consistency and Rhetoric?

  2011cites this paper
• Capital in the neoclassical theory: some notes

  2011cites this paper
• Revisiting the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies: A Historical and Analytical Study

  2011cites this paper
• Memorializing Paul A. Samuelson: A Review of His Major Works, 1915–2009

  2010cites this paper
• Macroeconomics: An Introduction To Advanced Methods

  2010cites this paper
• THE CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL CONTROVERSY IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND SOME UNSETTLED ANALYTICAL ISSUES

  2010cites this paper
• Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? (With comments by L. Pasinetti, F. Fisher, J. Felipe and J. McCombie, R. Greenfield and reply by the authors)

  2009cites this paper
• Why John Stuart Mill should not be enlisted among neoclassical economists

  2009cites this paper
• Investissement, progrès technique et croissance économique

  2009cites this paper
• Fisherian analysis, the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, and the new Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence of 2000

  2009cites this paper
• Theory, Consistency and Rhetoric

  2009influential citation
• A NOTE INTRODUCING GAREGNANI'S PAPER

  2008cites this paper
• The Life and Works of C.E. Ferguson 1

  2007cites this paper
• CE Ferguson : Life and Works 0 The Life and Works of

  2007influential citation
• La función de producción agregada en retrospectiva

  2005influential citation
• The reswitching debate

  2003cites this paper
• To Measure or Not To Measure Total Factor Productivity Growth?

  2003cites this paper
• Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know

  2003cites this paper
• The Emphasis on Competitive Markets in Introductory Microeconomics Courses

  2003cites this paper
• Firms' Cost Functions: A Reconstruction

  2001cites this paper
• The Solow Residual, Technical Change, and Aggregate Production Functions

  2000cites this paper
• Ten Cheaper Spades: Production Theory and Cost Curves in the Short Run

  2000cites this paper
• Total factor productivity growth in East Asia : a critical survey

  1999cites this paper
• ‘Are There Laws of Production’: an assessment of the early criticisms of the

  1998cites this paper
• On the Choice of Technique: A Comment

  1994cites this paper
• Neo-classical Economics and Neo-Darwinism: Clearing the Way for Historical Thinking

  1993cites this paper
• Principles and Instruments of the Islamic Political Economy

  1992cites this paper
• The Theory of Income Distribution

  1992cites this paper
• ‘Riba’, Financial Interest

  1992cites this paper
• Serie Research Memoranda Classical General Equilibrium Models

  1991cites this paper
• Quantity of capital

  1990cites this paper
• Mr. Sraffa on joint production and other essays

  1989influential citation
• VALUE AND DISTRIBUTION IN THE CLASSICAL ECONOMISTS AND MARX

  1984cites this paper
• Methodological Morality in the Cambridge Controversies

  1980cites this paper
• Some Observations on Economic Theory and Technical Change

  1980cites this paper
• Capital Stock, Capital Services and the Use of Fuel Consumption Proxies: An Appraisal

  1979cites this paper
• Energy, the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem, and U. S. international trade

  1978cites this paper
• Reswitching, Wicksell Effects, and the Neoclassical Production Function

  1977cites this paper
• La croissance économique, phénomène de déséquilibres harmonisés. Essai d'analyse sociologique des processus de développement

  1976cites this paper
• The Neoclassical Production Function

  1974cites this paper
• THE NEOCLASSICAL AND THE NEO‐MARXIST‐KEYNESIAN THEORIES OF INCOME DISTRIBUTION: A NON‐CAMBRIDGE CONTRIBUTION TO THE CAMBRIDGE CONTROVERSY IN CAPITAL THEORY*

  1974cites this paper
• Paradise Reswitched

  1973cites this paper
• Human capital approach to road safety

  1972cites this paper
• Aggregate Production Functions with Micro Foundations

  year unknowninfluential citation
• World Economics Association (wea)

  year unknowncites this paper
• I. Capital in the Neoclassical Theory. and Ii. a Reply to Professor Bliss's Comment Some Notes

  year unknowncites this paper