Into Blue Skies—a Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation Method for Adding Robustness to Visioneering

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  NanoEthics

• Publication date

  2017-02-24

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Economics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s11569-017-0284-7
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Visioneering Socio-Technical Innovations — a Missing Piece of the Puzzle

  2017cited by this paper
• Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement

  2016cited by this paper
• Responsibility and Visioneering—Opening Pandora’s Box

  2016cited by this paper
• Lay knowledge, social movements and the use of medicines: Personal reflections

  2016cited by this paper
• Revisiting “Upstream Public Engagement”: from a Habermasian Perspective

  2016cited by this paper
• The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014)

  2016cited by this paper
• A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey

  2015cited by this paper
• Advances in transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies, methodologies and processes

  2015cited by this paper
• Citizens' Visions on Active Assisted Living

  2015influential reference
• Responsibility and Visions in the New and Emerging Technologies

  2014cited by this paper
• Reassessing expert knowledge and the politics of expertise

  2014cited by this paper
• Why should we promote public engagement with science?

  2014cited by this paper
• From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy

  2014cited by this paper
• The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies and a Limitless Future

  2014influential reference
• Visioneering and the Role of Active Engagement and Assessment

  2014cited by this paper
• Upstream public engagement, downstream policy-making? The Brain Imaging Dialogue as a community of inquiry

  2014cited by this paper
• Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking Back to the Future

  2014cited by this paper
• Methodology of Transdisciplinarity

  2014cited by this paper
• Transleadership for Transdisciplinary Initiatives

  2014cited by this paper
• Modes of orientation provided by futures studies: making sense of diversity and divergence

  2014cited by this paper
• Learning How to Innovate as a Socio-epistemological Process of Co-creation: Towards a Constructivist Teaching Strategy for Innovation

  2014cited by this paper
• Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science

  2014cited by this paper
• Utopia as Method

  2013cited by this paper
• Comparing technological hype cycles: Towards a theory

  2013cited by this paper
• Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society

  2013cited by this paper
• The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: The role of industrial users in semiconductors

  2013cited by this paper
• The tragedy of citizen deliberation – two cases of participatory technology assessment

  2013cited by this paper
• Science in Society: caring for our futures in turbulent times

  2013cited by this paper
• Visions, Hype, and Expectations: A Place for Responsibility

  2013cited by this paper
• Mutual learning for knowledge co-creation about disability inclusive development: experiences with a community of practice

  2013cited by this paper
• Dialogue and science: Innovation in policy-making and the discourse of public engagement in the UK

  2013cited by this paper
• The good, the bad and the perfect: Criticizing engagement practice

  2013cited by this paper
• An examination of factors affecting accuracy in technology forecasts

  2013cited by this paper
• Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies

  2012cited by this paper
• Forward-looking activities: incorporating citizens’ visions

  2012influential reference
• The Paradox of Participation Experiments

  2012cited by this paper
• Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology

  2011cited by this paper
• Future sustainability and images

  2010cited by this paper
• Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement

  2010cited by this paper
• Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea

  2009cited by this paper
• Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability

  2009cited by this paper
• Fast and frugal forecasting

  2009cited by this paper
• The vision phenomenon: Towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning

  2009cited by this paper
• Co-creation and the new landscapes of design

  2008cited by this paper
• Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review

  2008cited by this paper
• Rethinking Expertise

  2008cited by this paper
• Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970–2006): hype-cycles, closed networks and technology-focused learning

  2008cited by this paper
• Deliberative Innovation to Different Effect: Consensus Conferences in Denmark, France, and the United States

  2008cited by this paper
• Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn

  2008cited by this paper
• Democratizing Science Movements

  2007cited by this paper
• Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’?

  2007cited by this paper
• Looking for the blue: The necessity of utopia

  2007cited by this paper
• Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways

  2007cited by this paper
• Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake

  2007cited by this paper
• Lay expertise: why involve the public in biobank governance?

  2007cited by this paper
• Patient organizations and public health.

  2007cited by this paper
• The sociology of expectations in science and technology

  2006cited by this paper
• Negotiating contested visions and place-specific expectations of the hydrogen economy

  2006cited by this paper
• Can vision motivate planning action?

  2006cited by this paper
• Action research cycles for multiple futures perspectives

  2006cited by this paper
• Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe

  2006cited by this paper
• Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics

  2006cited by this paper
• Participatory science governance revisited: normative expectations versus empirical evidence

  2006cited by this paper
• Eliciting Experts' Knowledge: a comparison of two methods

  2006cited by this paper
• From Schism to Continuum? The Problematic Relationship Between Expert and Lay Knowledge—An Exploratory Conceptual Synthesis of Two Qualitative Studies

  2005cited by this paper
• Ideology and utopia

  2004cited by this paper
• Bridges between science, society and policy : technology assessment - methods and impacts

  2004cited by this paper
• May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide.

  2004cited by this paper
• See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream

  2004cited by this paper
• Bridges between Science, Society and Policy

  2004cited by this paper
• Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes.

  2003cited by this paper
• Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science

  2003cited by this paper
• Technology assessment at the German Bundestag: ‘Expertising’ democracy for ‘democratising’ expertise

  2003cited by this paper
• Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology.

  2003cited by this paper
• Visioning in Planning: Is the Practice Based on Sound Theory?

  2002cited by this paper
• Participatory technology assessment: European perspectives

  2002cited by this paper
• The nature of market visioning for technology-based radical innovation

  2001cited by this paper
• Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences

  2001cited by this paper
• Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation

  2000cited by this paper
• Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls

  2000cited by this paper
• Berkes, F., and C. Folke, editors. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press, New York.

  2000cited by this paper
• Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge

  2000cited by this paper
• Visions of Alternative (Unpredictable) Futures and Their Use in Policy Analysis

  2000cited by this paper
• Visions of Technology: Social and Institutional Factors Shaping the Development of New Technologies

  1996cited by this paper
• The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials

  1995cited by this paper
• Rio Declaration on Environment and Development

  1992cited by this paper
• The Principle of Hope.

  1991cited by this paper
• The Principle of Hope

  1988cited by this paper
• The Social Control of Technology

  1982cited by this paper
• The Public Service Production Process: A Framework for Analyzing Police Services

  1978cited by this paper
• Participation and democratic theory

  1970cited by this paper
• Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation

  year unknowncited by this paper

• A System of Care, Not Control: Co-Designing Online Safety and Wellbeing Solutions with Guardians ad Litem for Youth in Child Welfare

  2026cites this paper
• Explaining It Your Way - Findings from a Co-Creative Design Workshop on Designing XAI Applications with AI End-Users from the Public Sector

  2024cites this paper
• Options for making responsive future strategy to foster sustainability transitions in the German agri-food sector: a Delphi-based approach

  2024cites this paper
• Enacting anticipatory heuristics: a tentative methodological proposal for steering responsible innovation

  2023cites this paper
• Exploring knowledge creation, capabilities, and relations in a distributed policy foresight system: Case Finland

  2023cites this paper
• Regionally extended shared socioeconomic pathways for the offshore wind industry in Finland

  2022cites this paper
• Participatory foresight and reflexive innovation: setting policy goals and developing strategies in a bottom-up, mission-oriented, sustainable way

  2021cites this paper
• Rethinking societal engagement under the heading of Responsible Research and Innovation: (novel) requirements and challenges

  2021cites this paper
• Democratising utopian thought in participatory agenda setting

  2021influential citation
• Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation

  2021cites this paper
• Co-creation in support of responsible research and innovation: an analysis of three stakeholder workshops on nanotechnology for health

  2021influential citation
• How Can I Contribute? Citizen Engagement in the Development of Nanotechnology for Health

  2021cites this paper
• Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research

  2020cites this paper
• Considering expert takeovers in citizen involvement processes

  2019cites this paper
• Three myths of neutrality in TA - How different forms of TA imply different understandings of neutrality

  2019cites this paper
• Visions in assemblages: Future-making and governance in FabLabs

  2019cites this paper
• Bridging epistemologies—Identifying uniqueness of lay and expert knowledge for agenda setting

  2019cites this paper
• But do they deliver? Participatory agenda setting on the test bed

  2018cites this paper
• CIVISTI – A forward-looking methodbased on citizens ’ visions transformation are a key factor for

  2017cites this paper
• Futures Perfect and Visioneering: a Re-Assessment

  2017cites this paper
• Futures Perfect and Visioneering: a Re-Assessment

  2017cites this paper
• Technology assessment as a myth buster: deconstructing myths around emerging technologies

  2017cites this paper
• Futures of ageing and technology – comparing different actors’ prospective views

  2017cites this paper
• Imagining socio-technical futures – challenges and opportunities for technology assessment

  2017cites this paper
• Transdisciplinary forward-looking agenda setting for age-friendly, human centered cities

  2017cites this paper
• CIVISTI – A forward-looking method based on citizens’ visions

  2016cites this paper
• AIS Electronic

  year unknowncites this paper