Performance of small general practices under the UK's Quality and Outcomes Framework.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

• Publication date

  2010-09-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.3399/bjgp10X515340PMID 20849683PMCID PMC2930243
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework.

  2008cited by this paper
• The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

  2007cited by this paper
• Achievement of metabolic targets for diabetes by English primary care practices under a new system of incentives

  2007cited by this paper
• Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.

  2006cited by this paper
• Determinants of primary medical care quality measured under the new UK contract: cross sectional study

  2006cited by this paper
• Workload and reward in the Quality and Outcomes Framework of the 2004 general practice contract.

  2006cited by this paper
• Practice size and quality attainment under the new GMS contract: a cross-sectional analysis.

  2006cited by this paper
• Saying 'goodbye' to single-handed practices; what do patients and staff lose or gain?

  2004cited by this paper
• Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom.

  2004cited by this paper
• Association between practice size and quality of care of patients with ischaemic heart disease: cross sectional study

  2003cited by this paper
• Do single handed practices offer poorer care? Cross sectional survey of processes and outcomes

  2001cited by this paper
• Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study

  2001cited by this paper
• Practice size: impact on consultation length, workload, and patient assessment of care.

  2001cited by this paper

• Effects of pay-for-performance for primary care physicians on type 2 diabetes outcomes: Evidence from rural China.

  2025cites this paper
• The impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: results from a rapid scoping review

  2025cites this paper
• General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review

  2024cites this paper
• The impact of collaborative organisational models and general practice size on patient safety and quality of care in the English National Health Service: A systematic review.

  2023cites this paper
• The entrepreneurial orientation of general practitioners-Current theory and practice in the Czech Republic.

  2023cites this paper
• Small practice participation and performance in Medicare accountable care organizations.

  2022cites this paper
• Using quality indicators to predict inspection ratings: cross-sectional study of general practices in England

  2019cites this paper
• Chronic morbidity, deprivation and primary medical care spending in England in 2015-16: a cross-sectional spatial analysis

  2018cites this paper
• Understanding variation in the clinical quality of primary care: a typology of general practice organisations

  2017cites this paper
• Author’s response to reviews Title: Chronic morbidity, deprivation and primary medical care spending in England in 2015-16: a cross-sectional spatial analysis Authors:

  2017cites this paper
• Impact of pay for performance on behavior of primary care physicians and patient outcomes

  2016influential citation
• Is the distribution of care quality provided under pay-for-performance equitable? Evidence from the Advancing Quality programme in England

  2016cites this paper
• What did we learn from 12 years of QOF ?

  2016cites this paper
• On the economic value of preventive care : a life-cycle model perspective *

  2016cites this paper
• Physician Response to Target-Based Performance Payment

  2016cites this paper
• Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review

  2016cites this paper
• Essays on the economics of health

  2016cites this paper
• [Pay-for-performance in health care services: a review of the best evidence available].

  2015cites this paper
• Understanding the Intervention and Implementation Factors Associated with Benefits and Harms of Pay for Performance Programs in Healthcare

  2015cites this paper
• Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review

  2015cites this paper
• Examining the effectiveness of Quality Outcomes Framework targets using individual level data : an econometric analysis

  2014cites this paper
• Withdrawing performance indicators: retrospective analysis of general practice performance under UK Quality and Outcomes Framework

  2014cites this paper
• Withdrawing performance indicators: retrospective analysis of general practice performance under UK Quality and Outcomes Framework

  2014cites this paper
• Patient safety in English general practice : the role of routinely collected data in detecting adverse events

  2013cites this paper
• The Relationship between Quality of Care and Choice of Clinical Computing System: Retrospective Analysis of Family Practice Performance under the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework

  2013cites this paper
• Pay-for-Performance: Impact on Diabetes

  2013cites this paper
• Impact of pay‐for‐performance on management of diabetes: a systematic review

  2013cites this paper
• Strengthening weak primary care systems: steps towards stronger primary care in selected Western and Eastern European countries.

  2013cites this paper
• Pay-for-performance schemes explicitly link provider remuneration to the quality of care provided, with the aims of modifying provider behavior and improving patient outcomes. If successful, pay-for-performance schemes could drive improvements in quality and efficiency of care. However, financial in

  2013cites this paper
• Healthcare Reform: The Need for a Complex Adaptive Systems Approach

  2013cites this paper
• Pay for performance in general practice - quality to what price?

  2013influential citation
• Relationship between quality of care and choice of clinical computing system: retrospective analysis of family practice performance under the UK's quality and outcomes framework

  2013cites this paper
• Family doctor responses to changes in incentives for influenza immunization under the U.K. Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme.

  2012cites this paper
• Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice

  2012cites this paper
• Exploring the Organisational Impact of the NHS Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in GP Practices

  2011cites this paper
• Contractual Change and UK General Practitioners: Still a Case of Street-Level Bureaucrats?

  2011cites this paper
• Quality and Outcomes Framework: time to take stock.

  2010cites this paper
• Health inequalities affect the health of all.

  2010cites this paper