Behavioral Experiments for Assessing the Abstract Argumentation Semantics of Reinstatement

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  Cognitive Sciences

• Publication date

  2010-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01123.xPMID 21564255
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Framing human inference by coherence based probability logic

  2009cited by this paper
• Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence

  2009cited by this paper
• A theory of utility conditionals: Paralogical reasoning from decision-theoretic leakage.

  2009cited by this paper
• Logic and Reasoning: do the facts matter?

  2008cited by this paper
• On the Qualitative Comparison of Decisions Having Positive and Negative Features

  2008cited by this paper
• Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science

  2008cited by this paper
• Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent

  2008cited by this paper
• Predicting causality ascriptions from background knowledge: model and experimental validation

  2008cited by this paper
• Elements of Argumentation

  2007cited by this paper
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics

  2007influential reference
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence

  2007cited by this paper
• A study of argumentation in a causal probabilistic humanistic domain: Genetic counseling

  2007cited by this paper
• Portia: A User-Adapted Persuasion System in the Healthy-Eating Domain

  2007cited by this paper
• A human–computer debating system prototype and its dialogue strategies

  2007cited by this paper
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms

  2007cited by this paper
• Modeling Reciprocal Behavior in Human Bilateral Negotiation

  2007cited by this paper
• Logics in Artificial Intelligence: 10th European Conference, JELIA 2006, Liverpool, UK, September 13-15, 2006, Proceedings

  2006cited by this paper
• Two Varieties of Conditionals and Two Kinds of Defeaters Help Reveal Two Fundamental Types of Reasoning

  2006cited by this paper
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation

  2006cited by this paper
• Semi-stable semantics

  2006cited by this paper
• An Overview of Possibilistic Handling of Default Reasoning, with Experimental Studies

  2005cited by this paper
• Coherence and Nonmonotonicity in Human Reasoning

  2005cited by this paper
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics

  2005cited by this paper
• An Argumentation-Based Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision

  2005cited by this paper
• The Case for Psychologism in Default and Inheritance Reasoning

  2005cited by this paper
• System LS: A Three‐Tiered Nonmonotonic Reasoning System

  2004cited by this paper
• Reinstatement, floating conclusions, and the credulity of Mental Model reasoning

  2004cited by this paper
• What do epistemic logic and cognitive science have to do with each other?

  2003cited by this paper
• An Empirical Test of Patterns for Nonmonotonic Inference

  2002cited by this paper
• Skepticism and floating conclusions

  2002cited by this paper
• Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.

  2002cited by this paper
• Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies

  2002cited by this paper
• Rationality.

  2002cited by this paper
• Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition

  2000cited by this paper
• Strategies in Human Nonmonotonic Reasoning

  2000cited by this paper
• Generating arguments in natural language

  1999cited by this paper
• Handboek van de argumentatietheorie. Historische achtergronden en hedendaagse ontwikkelingen [Vertaling van: 'Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Mawhaw N.J.]

  1997cited by this paper
• What Should Default Reasoning be, by Default?

  1997cited by this paper
• Fundamentals Of Argumentation Theory

  1996cited by this paper
• On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games

  1995cited by this paper
• The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

  1981cited by this paper

• An introduction to computational argumentation research from a human argumentation perspective

  2025cites this paper
• Advancing Deliberative Discourse Measurement: The Intersection with Computational Abstract Argumentation in Discourse Quality Evaluations

  2025cites this paper
• Human compliance with computational argumentation principles

  2025cites this paper
• Human Compliance with Normative Principles in Argumentation: Effects of Naturalness Bias and Graphical Representation

  2024cites this paper
• Experimental evaluation of gradual argument acceptability semantics: The case of reinstatement

  2024influential citation
• Related Explanations in Formal Argumentation, an Empirical Study

  2024influential citation
• Syntactic reasoning with conditional probabilities in deductive argumentation

  2023cites this paper
• Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength

  2023influential citation
• An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments

  2023cites this paper
• GraphNLI: A Graph-based Natural Language Inference Model for Polarity Prediction in Online Debates

  2022cites this paper
• Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation

  2022influential citation
• Resilience, reliability, and coordination in autonomous multi-agent systems

  2022cites this paper
• Modelling online debates with argumentation theory

  2022cites this paper
• Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation

  2021cites this paper
• Strategic argumentation dialogues for persuasion: Framework and experiments based on modelling the beliefs and concerns of the persuadee

  2021cites this paper
• Who Has the Last Word? Understanding How to Sample Online Discussions

  2021cites this paper
• Generating Instantiated Argument Graphs from Probabilistic Information

  2020cites this paper
• Logic and Argumentation: Third International Conference, CLAR 2020, Hangzhou, China, April 6–9, 2020, Proceedings

  2020cites this paper
• Knowledge Engineering Tools and Techniques for AI Planning

  2020cites this paper
• Argument-Based Plan Explanation

  2020cites this paper
• Towards Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation using Conditional Logic Semantics

  2020cites this paper
• re-A Replication Study of Semantics in Argumentation

  2020cites this paper
• Logic Programming, Argumentation and Human Reasoning

  2020cites this paper
• A Replication Study of Semantics in Argumentation

  2019cites this paper
• Deb8: A Tool for Collaborative Analysis of Video

  2019cites this paper
• Comfort or safety? Gathering and using the concerns of a participant for better persuasion

  2019cites this paper
• SCF2 - an Argumentation Semantics for Rational Human Judgments on Argument Acceptability

  2019cites this paper
• Technical report of "Empirical Study on Human Evaluation of Complex Argumentation Frameworks"

  2019cites this paper
• Université de Montréal-Thèse et mémoire

  2019cites this paper
• Empirical Study on Human Evaluation of Complex Argumentation Frameworks

  2019cites this paper
• Towards Computational Persuasion via Natural Language Argumentation Dialogues

  2019cites this paper
• Having the Last Word: Understanding How to Sample Discussions Online

  2019cites this paper
• EXPLAINABLE, TRUSTABLE AND EMPHATIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FROM FORMAL ARGUMENTATION THEORY TO ARGUMENTATION FOR HUMANS

  2018cites this paper
• On Scientific Enquiry and Computational Argumentation

  2018influential citation
• Domain Modelling in Computational Persuasion for Behaviour Change in Healthcare

  2018cites this paper
• Epistemic Graphs for Representing and Reasoning with Positive and Negative Influences of Arguments

  2018cites this paper
• Towards a framework for computational persuasion with applications in behaviour change

  2018cites this paper
• On the Graded Acceptability of Arguments in Abstract and Instantiated Argumentation

  2018cites this paper
• Classical logic, argument and dialectic

  2018cites this paper
• Notes on Abstract Argumentation Theory

  2018cites this paper
• Predicting Human Decision-Making: From Prediction to Action

  2018cites this paper
• Abstraction in Argumentation: Necessary but Dangerous

  2018influential citation
• Empirical Cognitive Study on Abstract Argumentation Semantics

  2018influential citation
• Directionality of Attacks in Natural Language Argumentation

  2018cites this paper
• Empirical Methods for Modelling Persuadees in Dialogical Argumentation

  2017cites this paper
• ArgueApply: A Mobile App for Argumentation

  2017cites this paper
• Assessing Convincingness of Arguments in Online Debates with Limited Number of Features

  2017cites this paper
• The Complete Extensions do not form a Complete Semilattice

  2017cites this paper
• Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: Supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches

  2017cites this paper
• From Psychological Persuasion To Abstract Argumentation: A Step Forward

  2017cites this paper
• Emotions and personality traits in argumentation: An empirical evaluation

  2017cites this paper
• Persuasive Argumentation and Emotions: An Empirical Evaluation with Users

  2017cites this paper
• Classical Logic , Argumentation and Dialectic

  2017cites this paper
• Providing Arguments in Discussions on the Basis of the Prediction of Human Argumentative Behavior

  2016cites this paper
• Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Principles in Argumentation-Enabled Collective Intelligence

  2016cites this paper
• Strategical Argumentative Agent for Human Persuasion

  2016cites this paper
• Computationally Viable Handling of Beliefs in Arguments for Persuasion

  2016cites this paper
• Introduction to the Special Issue on Human Interaction with Artificial Advice Givers

  2016cites this paper
• Computational Persuasion with Applications in Behaviour Change

  2016cites this paper
• ABA+: Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferences

  2016cites this paper
• Two Dimensional Uncertainty in Persuadee Modelling in Argumentation

  2016cites this paper
• Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Rules in Argumentation-enabled Collective Intelligence

  2016cites this paper
• Argumentation Theory in the Field : An Empirical Study of Fundamental Notions

  2015cites this paper
• On Explanations for Non-Acceptable Arguments

  2015cites this paper
• On the Graded Acceptability of Arguments

  2015cites this paper
• Modelling the Persuadee in Asymmetric Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion

  2015cites this paper
• Providing Arguments in Discussions Based on the Prediction of Human Argumentative Behavior

  2015cites this paper
• Evaluation of a trust-modulated argumentation-based interactive decision-making tool

  2015cites this paper
• Emotions in Argumentation: an Empirical Evaluation

  2015cites this paper
• Argumentation Mining in Persuasive Essays and Scientific Articles from the Discourse Structure Perspective

  2014cites this paper
• Formal Argumentation: A Human-centric Perspective

  2014cites this paper
• SAsSy - Making Decisions Transparent with Argumentation and Natural Language Generation

  2014cites this paper
• A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making

  2014cites this paper
• Demo: making plans scrutable with argumentation and natural language generation

  2014cites this paper
• Argumentation Theory in the Field: An Empirical Study of Fundamental Notions

  2014cites this paper
• Beyond admissibility: accepting cycles in argumentation with game protocols for cogency criteria

  2014cites this paper
• Formal Arguments, Preferences, and Natural Language Interfaces to Humans: an Empirical Evaluation

  2014cites this paper
• Formal Models of Reasoning in Cognitive Psychology

  2013cites this paper
• A natural language bipolar argumentation approach to support users in online debate interactions†

  2013cites this paper
• SAsSy—scrutable autonomous systems

  2013cites this paper
• Choosing to argue: Towards a theory of argumentative decisions

  2013cites this paper
• Proceedings of the 2 nd IUI Workshop on Interacting with Smart Objects

  2013influential citation
• Argumentation, decision and rationality

  2013cites this paper
• Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentation

  2012cites this paper
• A computational model for the identification and assessment of structural similarities in argumentative discourses

  2012cites this paper
• Argumentation Games for Admissibility and Cogency Criteria

  2012cites this paper
• Utility conditionals as consequential arguments: A random sampling experiment

  2012cites this paper
• Reasoning on the Web with Assumption-Based Argumentation

  2012cites this paper
• Bottom-Up Argumentation

  2011cites this paper
• Changing One's Mind: Erase or Rewind?

  2011cites this paper
• Graded Reinstatement in Belief Revision

  2011cites this paper
• Evaluating dialectical explanations for recommendations Partners

  year unknowncites this paper