Verb omission errors: Evidence of rational processing of noisy language inputs

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Linguistics, Computer Science

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Integrating surprisal and uncertain-input models in online sentence comprehension: formal techniques and empirical results

  2011cited by this paper
• Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: evidence from eye movements.

  2009cited by this paper
• Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input

  2009cited by this paper
• Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints.

  2004cited by this paper
• The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity

  1993cited by this paper
• Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

  1987cited by this paper
• Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences☆

  1987cited by this paper
• Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process

  1975cited by this paper

• Syntactic ambiguity and ambiguity avoidance in language comprehension and production

  2026cites this paper
• The effect of context on noisy-channel sentence comprehension.

  2023cites this paper
• Rational Sentence Interpretation in Mandarin Chinese

  2023cites this paper
• Word position coding in reading is noisy

  2019cites this paper
• You That Read Wrong Again! A Transposed-Word Effect in Grammaticality Judgments

  2018cites this paper
• Comprehenders Model the Nature of Noise in the Environment

  2018cites this paper
• Referential and lexical forces in number agreement

  2017cites this paper
• Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binomial expressions.

  2016cites this paper
• Structure-sensitive Noise Inference: Comprehenders Expect Exchange Errors

  2016cites this paper