Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: Fairness Perceptions of Group vs. Individual Decision Makers

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Organ. Sci.

• Publication date

  2015-10-01

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1287/orsc.2015.0992
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The Cost of Collaboration

  2012cited by this paper
• 17 Work Groups and Teams in Organizations

  2012cited by this paper
• Just Feelings? The Role of Affect in the Formation of Organizational Fairness Judgments

  2011cited by this paper
• Group Behavior and Performance

  2010cited by this paper
• A Contemporary Look at Organizational Justice: Multiplying Insult Times Injury

  2010cited by this paper
• 4 Towards a “Fairer” Conception of Process Fairness: Why, When and How More may not Always be Better than Less

  2009cited by this paper
• Multiple Mechanisms of Prime‐to‐Behavior Effects

  2009cited by this paper
• Event justice perceptions and employees' reactions: perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator.

  2008cited by this paper
• A Multi-Level Analysis of Organizational Justice Climate, Structure, and Employee Mental Health†

  2007cited by this paper
• Understanding the complexities of group perception: broadening the domain

  2007cited by this paper
• Handbook of Organizational Justice

  2005cited by this paper
• Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation.

  2005cited by this paper
• Priming a new identity: self-monitoring moderates the effects of nonself primes on self-judgments and behavior.

  2005cited by this paper
• The perception of outgroup threat: content and activation of the outgroup schema

  2004cited by this paper
• The Influence of Accuracy as a Function of Leader’s Bias: The Role of Trustworthiness in the Psychology of Procedural Justice

  2004cited by this paper
• The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books.

  2004cited by this paper
• The Psychology of Group Perception

  2004cited by this paper
• SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models

  2004cited by this paper
• Group performance and decision making.

  2004cited by this paper
• A Meta-Analysis of Priming Effects on Impression Formation Supporting a General Model of Informational Biases

  2004cited by this paper
• The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations

  2004cited by this paper
• On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments

  2003cited by this paper
• Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics

  2003cited by this paper
• Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.

  2002cited by this paper
• Disentangling the effects of voice: the incremental roles of opportunity, behavior, and instrumentality in predicting procedural fairness.

  2002cited by this paper
• When groups are more competitive than individuals: the domain of the discontinuity effect.

  2001cited by this paper
• Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction.

  2001cited by this paper
• Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.

  2001cited by this paper
• The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory

  2001cited by this paper
• Why a Board? Group Decisionmaking in Corporate Governance

  2001cited by this paper
• Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.

  2001cited by this paper
• Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of

  2000cited by this paper
• Procedures: do we really want to know them? An examination of the effects of procedural justice on self-esteem.

  2000cited by this paper
• Differential distrust of groups and individuals.

  1998cited by this paper
• When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority.

  1998cited by this paper
• Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next.

  1997cited by this paper
• Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments

  1997cited by this paper
• RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE

  1997cited by this paper
• An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.

  1996cited by this paper
• Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups.

  1996cited by this paper
• Intergroup Negotiations

  1996cited by this paper
• The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves

  1996cited by this paper
• Memory for and experience of differential competitive behavior of individuals and groups.

  1996cited by this paper
• Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams

  1993cited by this paper
• Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes.

  1992cited by this paper
• Relational schemas and the processing of social information.

  1992cited by this paper
• Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors : do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship ?

  1991cited by this paper
• The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims' layoff reactions.

  1991cited by this paper
• Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations.

  1991cited by this paper
• Judgment in Managerial Decision Making

  1990cited by this paper
• Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments

  1989cited by this paper
• Perceptions of Social Behavior

  1989cited by this paper
• The basis of citizens' perceptions of the criminal jury: Procedural fairness, accuracy, and efficiency.

  1988cited by this paper
• The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage.

  1987cited by this paper
• An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.

  1985cited by this paper
• Why We Are Fairer Than Others

  1985cited by this paper
• Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers

  1984cited by this paper
• The recall of information about persons and groups

  1982cited by this paper
• Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing.

  1981cited by this paper
• Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effect of prior knowledge.

  1981cited by this paper
• What does the Schema Concept Buy us?

  1980cited by this paper
• What Should Be Done with Equity Theory

  1980cited by this paper
• Racial and Behavioral Cues in Black and White Children's Perceptions of Ambiguously Aggressive Acts

  1980cited by this paper
• Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping.

  1978cited by this paper
• Inequity In Social Exchange

  1965cited by this paper
• Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments

  1951cited by this paper
• A study of some social factors in perception.

  1935cited by this paper

• Fusion of probabilistic linguistic term sets for enhanced group decision-making: Foundations, survey and challenges

  2025cites this paper
• Enabling or burdening: the double-edged sword effect of supply chain decentralization on supply chain efficiency

  2025cites this paper
• More generosity, less inequity aversion? Neural correlates of fairness perception under social distance and of its relation to generosity.

  2025cites this paper
• How organisational rejection affects innovators’ continued contribution – evidence from an Open Innovation Community

  2025cites this paper
• Identification breeds equity: the regulation effect of group decision-making on beauty premium

  2025cites this paper
• The plurality effect: People are more dishonest toward group than individual targets

  2025cites this paper
• Adopting Underdogs' Ideas Triggers Fairness? When and How Underachievers' Voice Endorsement Promotes Team Voice

  2024cites this paper
• Modeling Individual Fairness Beliefs and Its Applications

  2024cites this paper
• For Me or Against Me? Reactions to AI (vs. Human) Decisions That Are Favorable or Unfavorable to the Self and the Role of Fairness Perception

  2024cites this paper
• Channel coordination under retailer's (sub)conscious preferences of loss aversion and fairness

  2023cites this paper
• An Examination of Mind Perception and Moral Reasoning in Ethical Decision-Making: A Mixed-Methods Approach

  2022cites this paper
• Is That Decision Fair? A Formal Model to Assess an Individual's Belief on the Fairness of a Decision

  2021cites this paper
• Beyond averages : fairness in an economy that works for people

  2020cites this paper
• On the current state of combining human and artificial intelligence for strategic organizational decision making

  2020cites this paper
• Group Buying of Competing Retailers with Fairness Concerns

  2020cites this paper
• Organizational justice enactment: An agent-focused review and path forward

  2020cites this paper
• Watching Others Receive Unearned Superior Treatment: Examining the Effects on Tourists Who Receive Less Than Their Peers

  2018influential citation
• A Long-Term Perspective on Integration: The Case of a Serial Acquirer and Fundamental Human Values

  2018cites this paper