Privacy and Modern Advertising: Most US Internet Users Want 'Do Not Track' to Stop Collection of Data about their Online Activities

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2012-10-08

• Fields of study

  Business

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.31235/osf.io/xgpke
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Mobile Phones and Privacy

  2012cited by this paper
• Token attempt: the misrepresentation of website privacy policies through the misuse of p3p compact policy tokens

  2010cited by this paper
• What Californians Understand about Privacy Online

  2008cited by this paper
• Americans Online Privacy: The System Is Broken

  2003cited by this paper

• Third-Party Privacy Data Leak Analysis on Ontario Hospital Websites

  2025cites this paper
• Management of Enterprises in the Greek Economy

  2025cites this paper
• Why You've Got Mail: Evaluating Inbox Privacy Implications of Email Marketing Practices in Online Apps and Services

  2024cites this paper
• Tracking on the Web, Mobile and the Internet-of-Things

  2022cites this paper
• JOURNALISM IN NEW MEDIA AGE: EXPLORING JOURNALISTS’ PERCEIVED EASE AND IMPACT OF TWITTER ON JOB PERFORMANCE IN PAKISTAN

  2022cites this paper
• An extensive review of data security infrastructure and legislature

  2021cites this paper
• Online Tracking: When Does it Become Stalking?

  2021cites this paper
• AFFINITY PROFILING AND DISCRIMINATION BY ASSOCIATION IN ONLINE BEHAVIORAL ADVERTISING

  2021cites this paper
• Intelligent Information and Database Systems: 12th Asian Conference, ACIIDS 2020, Phuket, Thailand, March 23–26, 2020, Proceedings

  2020cites this paper
• Stuffing, Sniffing, Squatting, and Stalking: Sham Activities in Affiliate Marketing

  2020cites this paper
• Quantifying Information Exposure by Web Browsers

  2020cites this paper
• Improving the Robustness of the Cross-Domain Tracking Process

  2020cites this paper
• Losing Control to Data-Hungry Apps: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Mobile App Privacy

  2018influential citation
• The Price of Privacy

  2018cites this paper
• Irrelevant Advertising: How More Consumer Tracking Can Make Ads Less Effective

  2017cites this paper
• Digitale Souveränität: Technikutopien und Gestaltungsansprüche demokratischer Politik

  2017cites this paper
• 4 Years of EU Cookie Law: Results and Lessons Learned

  2017cites this paper
• Social Advertising: How Advertising that Explicitly Promotes Social Influence Can Backfire

  2016cites this paper
• Conflicting Administrative and Critical Paradigms in Data Tracking Policy: A Lazarsfeldian Analysis

  2016cites this paper
• Web 2.0 - The past and the future

  2016cites this paper
• What is a Cookie Worth?

  2015cites this paper
• Exposing the Hidden Web: An Analysis of Third-Party HTTP Requests on 1 Million Websites

  2015cites this paper
• An Empirical Evaluation of Web-Based Fingerprinting

  2015cites this paper
• FPGuard: Detection and Prevention of Browser Fingerprinting

  2015cites this paper
• Improving Privacy Protection in the area of Behavioural Targeting

  2015cites this paper
• Reputational Privacy and the Internet: A Matter for Law?

  2015cites this paper
• What web browsing reveals about your health

  2015cites this paper
• Doing It All: An Exploratory Study of Predictors of Media Multitasking

  2014cites this paper
• Browser Fingerprinting: Analysis, Detection, and Prevention at Runtime

  2014cites this paper
• Privacy implications of health information seeking on the web

  2014cites this paper
• Same Issues, New Devices: Is Smartphone App Privacy Groundhog Day for Regulators?

  2013cites this paper
• Free Fall: The Online Market's Consumer Preference Disconnect

  2013cites this paper
• Advertising Democracy: Audience Segmentation and Targeted Emails in the 2012 US Presidential Election Major Research Paper

  2013cites this paper
• A relational approach to the moral value of privacy

  2013cites this paper