Fighting pathophobia: how to construct constructive public engagement with biocontrol for nature without augmenting public fears

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  BioControl (Dordrecht)

• Publication date

  2012-04-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Sociology, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10526-011-9419-x
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants

  2020cited by this paper
• Opportunities and Constraints

  2013cited by this paper
• The New Media Environment

  2013cited by this paper
• Manipulating risk communication: Value predispositions shape public understandings of invasive species science in Hawaii

  2013influential reference
• The decline of public interest agricultural science and the dubious future of crop biological control in California

  2011cited by this paper
• Classical biological control for the protection of natural ecosystems

  2010cited by this paper
• The effects of legislation and policy in New Zealand and Australia on biosecurity and arthropod biological control research and development

  2010influential reference
• The New Media Environment: An Introduction

  2010cited by this paper
• Avoiding tears before bedtime : how biological control researchers could undertake better dialogue with their communities

  2010cited by this paper
• Progress in risk assessment for classical biological control

  2010cited by this paper
• Analyzing acceptance politics: Towards an epistemological shift in the public understanding of science and technology

  2010cited by this paper
• Enhancing the Multifunctionality of US Agriculture

  2010cited by this paper
• New Zealand Government and Politics

  2010cited by this paper
• Many Experts, Many Audiences: Public Engagement with Science and Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Executive Summary.

  2009cited by this paper
• The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity

  2009cited by this paper
• Coping with uncertainty: Assessing nanotechnologies in a citizen panel in Switzerland

  2009cited by this paper
• Opportunities and constraints for the biological control of weeds in Europe.

  2008cited by this paper
• What every biocontrol researcher should know about the public

  2008cited by this paper
• Washington DC - USA

  2008cited by this paper
• American Perceptions of Immigrant and Invasive Species: Strangers on the Land

  2007cited by this paper
• A Toolkit for Democratizing Science and Technology Policy: The Practical Mechanics of Organizing a Consensus Conference

  2007cited by this paper
• Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management.

  2006cited by this paper
• A Scientist's Guide To Talking With The Media: Practical Advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists

  2006cited by this paper
• Risk and ethics in biological control

  2005cited by this paper
• Invasive Species as Ecological Threat: Is Restoration an Alternative to Fear-based Resource Management?

  2005cited by this paper
• Environmental safety of biological control: Policy and practice in New Zealand

  2005cited by this paper
• Regulation of the release of biological control agents of arthopods in New Zealand and Australia.

  2005cited by this paper
• The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology

  2005cited by this paper
• A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms

  2005cited by this paper
• Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?

  2005cited by this paper
• Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality

  2004cited by this paper
• How science makes environmental controversies worse

  2004cited by this paper
• The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants

  2004cited by this paper
• How good are we at predicting the field host-range of fungal pathogens used for classical biological control of weeds?

  2004cited by this paper
• Confronting introduced species: a form of xenophobia?

  2003cited by this paper
• Review Article A global review of risk-benefit-cost analysis for the introduction of classical biological control agents against weeds: a crisis in the making?

  2003cited by this paper
• Natural Enemies--Metaphor or Misconception?

  2003cited by this paper
• Bioinvasions, bioterrorism, and biosecurity

  2003cited by this paper
• Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences

  2001cited by this paper
• Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs

  2001influential reference
• Biological Control of Invading Species--Risk and Reform

  2000influential reference
• Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility

  2000cited by this paper
• Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield

  1999influential reference
• The Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996

  1998cited by this paper
• Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology

  1998cited by this paper
• Why Environmental Policy Nightmares Recur

  1997cited by this paper
• How Risky is Biological Control

  1996influential reference
• Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

  1994cited by this paper
• Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.

  1994cited by this paper
• Perceived risk, trust, and democracy

  1993cited by this paper
• Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science

  1992cited by this paper
• The treaty of Waitangi.

  1990cited by this paper
• Perception of risk.

  1987influential reference
• BIOLOGICAL CONTROL of

  1975cited by this paper
• The effects

  year unknowncited by this paper

• The ethics of using biocontrol: understanding public perceptions of, and attitudes towards, biocontrol in principle and dung beetles in particular

  2025influential citation
• Exploring local attitudes towards current and potential future invasive wasp management in Aotearoa New Zealand

  2024cites this paper
• Knowledge and perceptions of invasive plant biocontrol in Europe versus the rest of the world.

  2022cites this paper
• Engagement and social acceptance in genome editing for human benefit: Reflections on research and practice in a global context

  2021cites this paper
• Efforts Towards Engaging Communities to Promote the Benefits of Biological Control Research and Implementation in South Africa

  2021cites this paper
• Aotearoa New Zealand: Participatory science and bicultural knowledge communication

  2020cites this paper
• Metaphor, Trust and Support for Non-native Species Control

  2020cites this paper
• Engagement and social acceptance in genome editing for human benefit: Reflections on research and practice in a global context.

  2020cites this paper
• A multidimensional framework to inform stakeholder engagement in the science and management of invasive and pest animal species

  2020cites this paper
• A multidimensional framework to inform stakeholder engagement in the science and management of invasive and pest animal species

  2020influential citation
• Classical biological control of iMikania micrantha/i: the sustainable solution.

  2017cites this paper
• Biological Control: Ecology and Applications

  2017cites this paper
• Biological control adoption in western U.S. orchard systems: Results from grower surveys

  2016cites this paper
• Some Perspectives on the Risks and Benefits of Biological Control of Invasive Alien Plants in the Management of Natural Ecosystems

  2013cites this paper
• Public Engagement with Biological Control of Invasive Plants: The State of the Question

  2013cites this paper
• 6 Biological Control of Weeds with Fungi

  2013cites this paper