Motion direction influences surface segmentation in stereo transparency.

To perceive multiple overlapping surfaces in the same location of the visual field (transparency), the visual system must determine which surface elements belong together, and should be integrated, and which should be kept apart. Spatial relations between surfaces, such as depth order, must also be determined. This article details two experiments examining the interaction of motion direction and disparity cues on the perception of depth order and surface segmentation in transparency. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with random-dot stereograms, where transparent planes were defined by differences in motion direction and disparity. Participants reported the direction of motion of the front surface. Results revealed marked effects of motion direction on perceived depth order. These biases interact with disparity in an additive manner, suggesting that the visual system integrates motion direction with other available cues to surface segmentation. This possibility was tested further in Experiment 2. Participants were presented with two intervals: one containing motion and disparity defined transparent planes, the other containing a volume of moving dots. Interplane disparity was varied to find thresholds for the correct identification of the transparent interval. Thresholds depended on motion direction: Thresholds were lower when disparities and directions in the transparency interval matched participants' preferred depth order, compared to conditions where disparity and direction were in conflict. These results suggest that motion direction influences the judgment of depth order even in the presence of other visual cues, and that the assignment of depth order may play an important role in segmentation.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Journal of Vision

• Publication date

  2016-12-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1167/16.15.17PMID 28006067
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance

  2015cited by this paper
• Interindividual differences in preferred directions of perceptual and motor decisions.

  2014cited by this paper
• Face perception is tuned to horizontal orientation in the N170 time window.

  2014cited by this paper
• A Causal Role for V5/MT Neurons Coding Motion-Disparity Conjunctions in Resolving Perceptual Ambiguity

  2013cited by this paper
• "Non-retinotopic processing" in Ternus motion displays modeled by spatiotemporal filters.

  2012cited by this paper
• There's more behind it: perceived depth order biases perceived numerosity/density.

  2012cited by this paper
• Usefulness influences visual appearance in motion transparency depth rivalry.

  2011cited by this paper
• The horizontal tuning of face perception relies on the processing of intermediate and high spatial frequencies.

  2011cited by this paper
• Sustained directional biases in motion transparency.

  2011cited by this paper
• Motion transparency: depth ordering and smooth pursuit eye movements.

  2011cited by this paper
• A model of neural mechanisms in monocular transparent motion perception.

  2010cited by this paper
• Natural-Scene Statistics Predict How the Figure–Ground Cue of Convexity Affects Human Depth Perception

  2010cited by this paper
• Preexposure disrupts learning of location-contingent perceptual biases for ambiguous stimuli.

  2010cited by this paper
• Uninformative visual experience establishes long term perceptual bias.

  2010cited by this paper
• The Mixture of Bernoulli Experts: a theory to quantify reliance on cues in dichotomous perceptual decisions.

  2009cited by this paper
• Motion transparency from opposing luminance modulated and contrast modulated gratings.

  2009cited by this paper
• Bi-stable depth ordering of superimposed moving gratings.

  2008cited by this paper
• Stereoscopic transparency: constraints on the perception of multiple surfaces.

  2008cited by this paper
• Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance.

  2007cited by this paper
• ECVP '07 Abstracts

  2007cited by this paper
• The visual processing of motion-defined transparency

  2007cited by this paper
• Pushing the limits of transparent-motion detection with binocular disparity.

  2006cited by this paper
• Stereo Motion Transparency Processing Implements an Ecological Smoothness Constraint

  2006cited by this paper
• Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning.

  2006cited by this paper
• Recovering depth-order from orientation-defined junctions

  2006cited by this paper
• An extension of the transparent-motion detection limit using speed-tuned global-motion systems.

  2006cited by this paper
• Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception.

  2005cited by this paper
• Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior

  2004cited by this paper
• Blindness to inconsistent local signals in motion transparency from oscillating dots.

  2004cited by this paper
• Neuronal activity and its links with the perception of multi-stable figures.

  2002cited by this paper
• Depth perception from pairs of overlapping cues in pictorial displays.

  2002cited by this paper
• Motion transparency: making models of motion perception transparent.

  1999cited by this paper
• What motion distributions yield global transparency and spatial segmentation?

  1999cited by this paper
• Does Binocular Disparity Facilitate the Detection of Transparent Motion?

  1999cited by this paper
• Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons

  1998cited by this paper
• The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

  1997cited by this paper
• The Psychophysics Toolbox.

  1997cited by this paper
• Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

  1995cited by this paper
• Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics

  1994cited by this paper
• A model for motion coherence and transparency

  1994cited by this paper
• Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. III. Modeling

  1994cited by this paper
• Dependence of plaid motion coherence on component grating directions.

  1993cited by this paper
• Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness.

  1993cited by this paper
• Motion: the long and short of it.

  1989cited by this paper
• Balanced and unbalanced, complete and partial transparency

  1985cited by this paper
• Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns

  1982cited by this paper
• The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement.

  1975cited by this paper
• A new look at the statistical model identification

  1974cited by this paper

• The role of binocular disparity and attention in the neural representation of multiple moving stimuli in the visual cortex

  2023cites this paper
• Structure of visual biases revealed by individual differences.

  2022cites this paper
• Binocular vision supports the development of scene segmentation capabilities: Evidence from a deep learning model

  2021cites this paper
• Idiosyncratic preferences in transparent motion and binocular rivalry are dissociable

  2020cites this paper
• Multidimensional internal dynamics underlying the perception of motion.

  2018cites this paper
• Complex internal dynamics underlying visual perception of motion

  2017cites this paper