AimTo assess whether the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography (MRM) can distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.Material and method207 MRM investigations were categorised according to BI-RADS. The results were compared to histology. All MRM studies were interpreted by two examiners. Statistical significance for the accuracy of MRM was calculated.ResultsA significant correlation between specific histology and MRM-tumour-morphology could not be reported. Mass (68%) was significant for malignancy. Significance raised with irregular shape (88%), spiculated margin (97%), rim enhancement (98%), fast initial increase (90%), post initial plateau (65%), and intermediate T2 result (82%). Highly significant for benignity was an oval mass (79%), slow initial increase (94%) and a hyperintense T2 result (77%), also an inconspicuous MRM result (77%) was often seen in benign histology. Symmetry (90%) and further post initial increase (90%) were significant, whereas a regional distribution (74%) was lowly significant for benignity.ConclusionOn basis of the BI-RADS classification an objective comparability and statement of diagnosis could be made highly significant. Due to the fact of false-negative and false-positive MRM-results, histology is necessary.
Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors
C. Sohns,M. Scherrer,W. Staab,S. Obenauer
Published 2011 in European Radiology
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2011
- Venue
European Radiology
- Publication date
2011-07-31
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-19 of 19 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-17 of 17 citing papers · Page 1 of 1