“It’s Not Like Judgment Day”: Public Understanding of and Reactions to Personalized Genomic Risk Information

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Journal of Genetic Counseling

• Publication date

  2012-06-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10897-011-9476-4PMID 22180182PMCID PMC3348376
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The General Public’s Understanding and Perception of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results

  2011influential reference
• Deflating the Genomic Bubble

  2011cited by this paper
• Epigenetic Modification of the FMR1 Gene in Fragile X Syndrome Is Associated with Differential Response to the mGluR5 Antagonist AFQ056

  2011cited by this paper
• Genetic counselling for personalised medicine

  2011cited by this paper
• Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: An assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs

  2011cited by this paper
• Perceiving cancer‐risks and heredity‐likelihood in genetic‐counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA 1/2‐test results

  2011cited by this paper
• Motivations and Perceptions of Early Adopters of Personalized Genomics: Perspectives from Research Participants

  2011influential reference
• Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.

  2011cited by this paper
• Genetic risk estimation in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative

  2011cited by this paper
• How Inclusion of Genetic Counselors on the Research Team Can Benefit Translational Science

  2011cited by this paper
• Users’ motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories

  2011cited by this paper
• Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers

  2010cited by this paper
• Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research.

  2010cited by this paper
• Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users

  2010influential reference
• Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine

  2010influential reference
• The Prospect of Genome-guided Preventive Medicine: A Need and Opportunity for Genetic Counselors

  2010influential reference
• Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative®: a prospective study of the utility of personalized medicine.

  2010influential reference
• Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.

  2010cited by this paper
• Considerations for the Impact of Personal Genome Information: A Study of Genomic Profiling among Genetics and Genomics Professionals

  2010cited by this paper
• Personal genomics: information can be harmful

  2010cited by this paper
• Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: Implications for physician-patient interactions

  2009cited by this paper
• Psychosocial aspects of genetic testing

  2009cited by this paper
• Genomic and personalized medicine: foundations and applications.

  2009cited by this paper
• Genetic risk prediction--are we there yet?

  2009cited by this paper
• Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits

  2009cited by this paper
• Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing

  2009influential reference
• Paving the Way to Personalized Genomic Medicine: Steps to Successful Implementation.

  2009cited by this paper
• Assessing Patient Readiness for the Clinical Adoption of Personalized Medicine

  2009cited by this paper
• The clinical application of genetic testing in type 2 diabetes: a patient and physician survey

  2009cited by this paper
• Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.

  2008cited by this paper
• Putting science over supposition in the arena of personalized genomics

  2008cited by this paper
• A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing

  2008cited by this paper
• An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons.

  2008influential reference
• Will genomics widen or help heal the schism between medicine and public health?

  2007cited by this paper
• Risky Communication: Pitfalls in Counseling About Risk, and How to Avoid Them

  2007cited by this paper
• Recall of disclosed Apolipoprotein E genotype and lifetime risk estimate for Alzheimer's disease: The REVEAL Study

  2006cited by this paper
• How many genes underlie the occurrence of common complex diseases in the population?

  2005cited by this paper
• Predictive Genetic Testing for Alzheimer's Disease: Impact upon Risk Perception

  2005cited by this paper
• Feeling at risk: How women interpret their familial breast cancer risk

  2004cited by this paper
• Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

  2004cited by this paper
• What does “A gene for heart disease” mean? A focus group study of public understandings of genetic risk factors

  2003cited by this paper
• Family and friends with disease: their impact on perceived risk.

  2003cited by this paper
• A vision for the future of genomics research

  2003influential reference
• Prediction and Intervention in Health-Related Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Protection Motivation Theory

  2000cited by this paper
• A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory.

  2000cited by this paper
• Incorporating biomarkers of exposure and genetic susceptibility into smoking cessation treatment: effects on smoking-related cognitions, emotions, and behavior change.

  1997cited by this paper
• Psychological impact of population-based carrier testing for cystic fibrosis: 3-year follow-up. UK Cystic Fibrosis Follow-Up Study Group.

  1996cited by this paper
• What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review.

  1996cited by this paper
• Diffusion of innovations

  1964cited by this paper

• The case for integrating genetic counselors into primary care: A paradigm shift for our profession

  2025cites this paper
• Sharing behavior and health care utilization following direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review

  2025influential citation
• Clinical translation of polygenic scores for prostate cancer screening.

  2025cites this paper
• Evaluating an approach for communicating integrated risk scores for melanoma

  2024cites this paper
• Motivations, perceptions and impacts of direct-to-consumer genetic testing among users in Brazil

  2024cites this paper
• Negative results from DNA-based population screening for adult-onset diseases: the recipients’ experience

  2024cites this paper
• Refining a Multifaceted Model of Perceived Utility of Genomic Sequencing Results

  2023cites this paper
• Perspectives of diverse Spanish- and English-speaking patients on the clinical use of polygenic risk scores

  2022cites this paper
• Influence of lived experience on risk perception among women who received a breast cancer polygenic risk score: ‘Another piece of the pie’

  2021cites this paper
• Physician-guided, hybrid genetic testing exerts promising effects on health-related behavior without compromising quality of life

  2021cites this paper
• Motivating Mexican American adults to share family history with healthcare providers

  2021cites this paper
• Why do people seek out polygenic risk scores for complex disorders, and how do they understand and react to results?

  2021cites this paper
• Does undertaking genome sequencing prompt actual and planned lifestyle-related behavior change in cancer patients and survivors? A qualitative study

  2021cites this paper
• Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Its Marketing: Emergent Ethical and Public Policy Implications

  2020cites this paper
• A scoping review of social and behavioral science research to translate genomic discoveries into population health impact.

  2020cites this paper
• Hmong participants’ reactions to return of individual and community pharmacogenetic research results: “A positive light for our community”

  2020cites this paper
• 'Well, I knew this already' - explaining personal genetic risk information through narrative meaning-making.

  2020cites this paper
• Online Genetics for Health: An Empirical Investigation of How Users Matter

  2020influential citation
• Genetic counseling following direct‐to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives

  2020cites this paper
• Hmong participants’ reactions to return of individual and community pharmacogenetic research results: “A positive light for our community”

  2020cites this paper
• Comprehension and personal value of negative non‐diagnostic genetic panel testing

  2020cites this paper
• Direct-to-consumer genetic testing

  2019cites this paper
• The public perception of the facilitators and barriers to implementing personalized medicine: a systematic review.

  2019cites this paper
• Perplexed by PGx? Exploring the impact of pharmacogenomic results on medical management, disclosures and patient behavior.

  2019cites this paper
• Summary of Key Areas for Research

  2019cites this paper
• Who should access germline genome sequencing? A mixed methods study of patient views

  2019cites this paper
• Exploring the emotional and behavioural reactions to receiving personalized melanoma genomic risk information: a qualitative study

  2019cites this paper
• Social Work and Genetics

  2019cites this paper
• INDIVIDUAL GENETIC RESEARCH RESULTS : Uncertainties, Conceptions, and Preferences

  2018cites this paper
• Cancer communication research in the era of genomics and precision medicine: a scoping review

  2018cites this paper
• Patients' Attitudes Towards the Return of Incidental Findings After Research with Residual Tissue: A Mixed Methods Study

  2018cites this paper
• Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services

  2018cites this paper
• Early Outcome Data Assessing Utility of a Post-Test Genomic Counseling Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Precision Health

  2018cites this paper
• Towards Cultural Competence in the Genomic Age: a Review of Current Health Care Provider Educational Trainings and Interventions

  2018cites this paper
• The PiGeOn project: protocol of a longitudinal study examining psychosocial and ethical issues and outcomes in germline genomic sequencing for cancer

  2018cites this paper
• “I would rather have it done by a doctor”—laypeople’s perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications

  2018cites this paper
• Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk

  2018cites this paper
• Counselees’ Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study

  2017cites this paper
• Making sense of genetic risk: A qualitative focus-group study of healthy participants in genomic research.

  2017cites this paper
• Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Genomic Counseling for Patients Receiving Personalized and Actionable Complex Disease Reports

  2017cites this paper
• Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  2017influential citation
• Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It’s Time to Consider Regulation

  2017cites this paper
• The Perceived Utility of Personalized Genomic Medicine in Individuals with a Family History of Heart Disease: A Pilot Study

  2017influential citation
• “Better Not to Know?”: Justifiable Limits on the Right to Information in the Realm of DTC Genetic Testing. An Analysis of the European and Spanish Legal Framework.

  2017cites this paper
• Essentially Biased: Why People Are Fatalistic About Genes

  2017cites this paper
• WHAT COUNTS? THE ROLE OF NUMERACY IN INTERPRETATION OF PERSONALIZED GENOMIC RISK INFORMATION IN CORIELL PARTICIPANTS

  2016cites this paper
• The Moral Reasoning of Genetic Dilemmas Amongst Jewish Israeli Undergraduate Students with Different Religious Affiliations and Scientific Backgrounds

  2016cites this paper
• Clinical Trial Accrual Targeting Genomic Alterations After Next-Generation Sequencing at a Non-National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Program.

  2016cites this paper
• [Direct to consumer genetic testing: is it the moment?].

  2016cites this paper
• Couple’s Narratives of Communion and Isolation Following Abnormal Prenatal Microarray Testing Results

  2016cites this paper
• The effect of communicating the genetic risk of cardiometabolic disorders on motivation and actual engagement in preventative lifestyle modification and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  2016cites this paper
• UK users' and genetics clinicians' experiences of direct-to-consumer genetic testing

  2015cites this paper
• Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports

  2015cites this paper
• Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review

  2015influential citation
• Health psychology and translational genomic research: bringing innovation to cancer-related behavioral interventions.

  2015cites this paper
• Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative: Exploring the Utility of Personalized Medicine

  2014cites this paper
• Biobanken en de terugkoppeling van onderzoeksbevindingen aan donoren

  2014cites this paper
• Impact of Delivery Models on Understanding Genomic Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

  2014cites this paper
• Design and Implementation of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Genomic Counseling for Patients with Chronic Disease

  2014cites this paper
• Genomic Counseling: Next Generation Counseling

  2014cites this paper
• Defining Genes Using “Blueprint” Versus “Instruction” Metaphors: Effects for Genetic Determinism, Response Efficacy, and Perceived Control

  2014cites this paper
• Who Are You Going to Call? Primary Care Patients’ Disclosure Decisions Regarding Direct–to–Consumer Genetic Testing

  2014cites this paper
• Promoting healthy dietary behaviour through personalised nutrition: technology push or technology pull?

  2014cites this paper
• Testing personalized medicine: patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer care

  2013cites this paper
• Direct-to-consumer genomic testing offers little clinical utility but appears to cause minimal harm.

  2013cites this paper
• Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies

  2013cites this paper
• Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.

  2013cites this paper
• Translational genomic research: protocol development and initial outcomes following SNP testing for colon cancer risk

  2013cites this paper
• Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests on Health Behaviour and Anxiety: A Survey of Consumers and Potential Consumers

  2013influential citation
• Primary care patients’ views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study

  2013cites this paper
• Incorporating direct-to-consumer genomic information into patient care: attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians.

  2012cites this paper
• Increasing Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Health Care Access, Internet Use, and Population Density Correlates

  2012cites this paper
• Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing and Cancer Risk Prediction

  2012influential citation
• Genetic risk estimation in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative

  2011cites this paper