The Ebbinghaus illusion in a fish (Xenotoca eiseni)

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Animal Cognition

• Publication date

  2014-11-21

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10071-014-0821-5PMID 25413845
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The brain creates illusions not just for us: sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum) can “see the magic” as well

  2014influential reference
• A reversed Ebbinghaus–Titchener illusion in bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus)

  2014influential reference
• Visual Hierarchical Processing and Lateralization of Cognitive Functions through Domestic Chicks' Eyes

  2014cited by this paper
• What can fish brains tell us about visual perception?

  2014influential reference
• Illusory patterns are fishy for fish, too

  2013cited by this paper
• Perception of the Ebbinghaus illusion in four-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus)

  2013influential reference
• Relative Size Discrimination and Perception of the Ebbinghaus Illusion in a Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)

  2012cited by this paper
• Core knowledge of object, number, and geometry: A comparative and neural approach

  2012cited by this paper
• Do reef fish, Variola louti and Scarus niger, perform amodal completion? Evidence from a field study.

  2011cited by this paper
• Animal visual perception.

  2011cited by this paper
• Processing of the Müller-Lyer illusion by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus).

  2010cited by this paper
• Processing of visual hierarchical stimuli by fish (Xenotoca eiseni).

  2010influential reference
• Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology

  2010cited by this paper
• Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans

  2010cited by this paper
• Perception of the Ebbinghaus illusion in 5- to 8- month old infants

  2010cited by this paper
• Animal cognition.

  2010cited by this paper
• Further Analysis of Perception of Reversed Müller-Lyer Figures for Pigeons (Columba Livia)

  2009cited by this paper
• Perception of Subjective Contours in Fish

  2009influential reference
• The Two Cultures: Shared Problems

  2009cited by this paper
• Comparative cognition : experimental explorations of animal intelligence

  2009cited by this paper
• Original Knowledge and the Two Cultures

  2009cited by this paper
• Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus-Titchener circles as an assimilation illusion.

  2008influential reference
• Perception of illusory surfaces and contours in goldfish

  2007cited by this paper
• Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

  2007cited by this paper
• Comparison of grouping abilities in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio) with the Ebbinghaus illusion.

  2007cited by this paper
• More accurate size contrast judgments in the Ebbinghaus Illusion by a remote culture.

  2007cited by this paper
• Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish

  2007influential reference
• Novel Relationships Among Ten Fish Model Species Revealed Based on a Phylogenomic Analysis Using ESTs

  2006cited by this paper
• Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

  2006cited by this paper
• Effects of the Ebbinghaus figure on grasping are not only due to misjudged size

  2005cited by this paper
• Organization and evolution of the avian forebrain.

  2005cited by this paper
• The Roles of Inducer Size and Distance in the Ebbinghaus Illusion (Titchener Circles)

  2005cited by this paper
• Visual Cognition and Representation in Birds and Primates

  2004cited by this paper
• Size Perception is Less Context-Sensitive in Males

  2004cited by this paper
• Comparative vertebrate cognition : are primates superior to non-primates?

  2004cited by this paper
• Comparative cognition and neuroscience: Misconceptions about brain evolution

  2004cited by this paper
• Hemispheric differences in the recognition of partly occluded objects by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus)

  2004cited by this paper
• Visual Context Integration is Not Fully Developed in 4-Year-Old Children

  2003cited by this paper
• A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control

  2002cited by this paper
• Dynamic shifts of pigeon local/global attention

  2002cited by this paper
• Short communication Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio)

  2002cited by this paper
• Do pigeons (Columba livia) perceive object unity?

  2001cited by this paper
• Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons.

  2001cited by this paper
• Similarity of the perimeters in the Ebbinghaus illusion

  1999cited by this paper
• Visual circuits of the avian telencephalon: evolutionary implications.

  1999cited by this paper
• Minimization of modal contours: an essential cross-species strategy in disambiguating relative depth

  1999cited by this paper
• Visual search for global/local stimulus features in humans and baboons

  1998cited by this paper
• A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution

  1998cited by this paper
• Priming of attention to local or global levels of visual analysis.

  1998cited by this paper
• Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: Similarity and difference in the three primate species

  1997cited by this paper
• Processing of global and local visual information and hemispheric specialization in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio).

  1997cited by this paper
• Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avian texture discrimination

  1996cited by this paper
• Linear perspective and the Ponzo illusion: a comparison between rhesus monkeys and humans1

  1996cited by this paper
• Horses are Sensitive to Pictorial Depth Cues

  1996cited by this paper
• Studying weak central coherence at low levels: children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions. A research note.

  1996cited by this paper
• Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

  1995influential reference
• Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks

  1995cited by this paper
• Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure.

  1993cited by this paper
• Pigeons Are Sensitive to the Spatial Organization of Complex Visual Stimuli

  1993cited by this paper
• Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers

  1993cited by this paper
• Effects of the inclination of context lines on perception of the Ponzo illusion by pigeons

  1993cited by this paper
• Dimensional organization and texture discrimination in pigeons

  1992cited by this paper
• Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review.

  1992cited by this paper
• Insect perception of illusory contours

  1992cited by this paper
• Separate visual pathways for perception and action.

  1992cited by this paper
• Pigeons see the Ponzo illusion

  1991cited by this paper
• Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image

  1983cited by this paper
• Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception.

  1983cited by this paper
• Susceptibility of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to the Ponzo illusion

  1983cited by this paper
• The pigeon's analysis of pictures

  1980cited by this paper
• Ebbinghaus illusion: context, contour, and age influence the judged size of a circle amidst circles.

  1979influential reference
• The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out”

  1979cited by this paper
• Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception ☆

  1977cited by this paper
• The Muller-Lyer figure and the fly

  1975cited by this paper
• The interrelationship between the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions.

  1972cited by this paper
• Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning

  1971cited by this paper
• Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion.

  1971cited by this paper
• Japanese studies on the so-called geometrical-optical illusions.

  1960cited by this paper
• Visual illusions in the chick

  1933cited by this paper
• Grundz?ge der psychologie.

  year unknowncited by this paper
• The Müller-Lyer illusion in the ring dove, Turtur risorius.

  year unknowncited by this paper
• Grundzüge der psychologie

  year unknowncited by this paper
• University of

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Exploring visual categorical learning in teleost fish Danio rerio and Xenotoca eiseni

  2026cites this paper
• Error detection is not necessary for representation

  2026cites this paper
• Relative size does matter: Animals see optical illusions

  2026cites this paper
• Circles of deception: the Ebbinghaus illusion from fish to birds

  2025cites this paper
• Freak Pictures, Fly Fishers, and Optical Illusions: Historical Antecedents of the Science of Fish Vision

  2024cites this paper
• Freak Pictures, Fly Fishers, and Optical Illusions: Historical Antecedents of the Science of Fish Vision

  2024cites this paper
• Quantity misperception by hymenopteran insects observing the solitaire illusion

  2023cites this paper
• Whither naïve realism? – I

  2023cites this paper
• Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are deceived by visual illusions during obstacle negotiation

  2022cites this paper
• “Classifying-together” phenomenon in fish (Xenotoca eiseni): Simultaneous exposure to visual stimuli impairs subsequent discrimination learning

  2022cites this paper
• Visual discrimination and amodal completion in zebrafish

  2022cites this paper
• Jumping spiders do not seem fooled by texture gradient illusions.

  2022cites this paper
• Methodological Challenges in the Assessment of Dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) Susceptibility of the Ebbinghaus-Titchener Illusion Using the Spontaneous Choice Task

  2021cites this paper
• How spontaneous is spontaneous quantity discrimination in companion dogs?

  2021cites this paper
• Comparative Studies on Geometric Illusions: A Review of Methods and Results

  2021cites this paper
• Visual Illusions: Insights from Comparative Cognition

  2021cites this paper
• Distinct Contributions of Genes and Environment to Visual Size Illusion and the Underlying Neural Mechanism

  2021cites this paper
• The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation

  2021cites this paper
• Is the susceptibility to visual illusions related to the relative brain size? Insights from small-brained species

  2020cites this paper
• Everything is subjective under water surface, too: visual illusions in fish

  2020cites this paper
• Exploring the Müller-Lyer illusion in a nonavian reptile (Pogona vitticeps).

  2020cites this paper
• Asymmetric Effects of the Ebbinghaus Illusion on Depth Judgments

  2020cites this paper
• Resting EEG in alpha band predicts individual differences in visual size perception.

  2020cites this paper
• Susceptibility to Size Visual Illusions in a Non-Primate Mammal (Equus caballus)

  2020cites this paper
• Forest before the trees in the aquatic world: global and local processing in teleost fishes

  2020cites this paper
• Illusion susceptibility in domestic dogs

  2020cites this paper
• Size Illusion

  2020cites this paper
• Perception of the Müller–Lyer illusion in guppies

  2019cites this paper
• Some Non-Human Languages of Thought

  2019cites this paper
• Microgenesis of Anticipation: Windowing the Present

  2019cites this paper
• Ebbinghaus Illusion

  2019cites this paper
• Can reptiles perceive visual illusions? Delboeuf illusion in red-footed tortoise (Chelonoidis carbonaria) and bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps).

  2019cites this paper
• Guppies, Poecilia reticulata, perceive a reversed Delboeuf illusion

  2019cites this paper
• Linear numerosity illusions in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella), rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), and humans (Homo sapiens)

  2019cites this paper
• Perception of Ebbinghaus–Titchener stimuli in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris)

  2019cites this paper
• Do Dogs Demonstrate Susceptibility to a Vertically Presented Ponzo Illusion

  2018cites this paper
• Subconscious processing reveals dissociable contextual modulations of visual size perception.

  2018cites this paper
• To Err Is (Not Only) Human: Fallibility as a Window Into Primate Cognition

  2017cites this paper
• Visual perception in domestic dogs: susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus–Titchener and Delboeuf illusions

  2017cites this paper
• Reconsidering Morphology Through an Experimental Case Study

  2017cites this paper
• Exploring the Solitaire Illusion in Guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

  2017cites this paper
• Ebbinghaus illusion , Delboeuf illusion , Titchener illusion , optical illusion , size perception , Apis mellifera

  2017influential citation
• Triggerfish uses chromaticity and lightness for object segregation

  2017cites this paper
• Do Dogs See the Ponzo illusion

  2017cites this paper
• Reconsidering Morphology Through an Experimental Case Study

  2017cites this paper
• Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions

  2017cites this paper
• Comparative visual illusions: Evolutionary, cross-cultural, and developmental perspectives.

  2017cites this paper
• The Ebbinghaus illusion in the gray bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum) in comparison to the teleost damselfish (Chromis chromis).

  2017cites this paper
• Perceptual category learning of photographic and painterly stimuli in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans

  2017cites this paper
• A Mathematical Science of Qualities: A Sequel

  2016cites this paper
• Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

  2016cites this paper
• A Mathematical Science of Qualities: A Sequel

  2016cites this paper
• DO BUDGERIGARS ( MELOPSITTACUS UNDULATUS ) PERCEIVE THE DELBOEUF ILLUSION?: A PRELIMINARY STUDY WITH A SIMULTANEOUS DISCRIMINATION TASK

  2016cites this paper
• Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive illusory motion?

  2015cites this paper
• A Science of Qualities

  2015cites this paper
• A Science of Qualities

  2015cites this paper
• Perception and discrimination of movement and biological motion patterns in fish

  2015cites this paper
• Spatial Elements in Visual Awareness. Challenges for an Intrinsic “Geometry” of the Visible

  2015cites this paper
• Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

  2015cites this paper
• An Investigation of Emergent Perceptual Phenomena in Primates: Illusions and Biases in Decision-Making

  2015cites this paper