BACKGROUND Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) is effective and cost-effective for people with mild-to-moderate dementia when delivered biweekly over 7 weeks. AIMS To examine whether longer-term (maintenance) CST is cost-effective when added to usual care. METHODS Cost-effectiveness analysis within multicenter, single-blind, pragmatic randomized controlled trial; subgroup analysis for people taking acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (ACHEIs). A total of 236 participants with mild-to-moderate dementia received CST for 7 weeks. They were randomized to either weekly maintenance CST added to usual care or usual care alone for 24 weeks. RESULTS Although outcome gains were modest over 6 months, maintenance CST appeared cost-effective when looking at self-rated quality of life as primary outcome, and cognition (MMSE) and proxy-rated quality-adjusted life years as secondary outcomes. CST in combination with ACHEIs offered cost-effectiveness gains when outcome was measured as cognition. CONCLUSIONS Continuation of CST is likely to be cost-effective for people with mild-to-moderate dementia.
Maintenance cognitive stimulation therapy: an economic evaluation within a randomized controlled trial.
Francesco d’Amico,A. Rehill,M. Knapp,E. Aguirre,H. Donovan,Z. Hoare,J. Hoe,I. Russell,A. Spector,Amy Streater,C. Whitaker,R. Woods,M. Orrell
Published 2015 in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2015
- Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
- Publication date
Unknown publication date
- Fields of study
Medicine, Economics
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-28 of 28 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-78 of 78 citing papers · Page 1 of 1